On 5/29/07, Pedro LaWrench <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
In my main server, I allow all with <Directory /mydocs> Order allow,deny Allow all </Directory> Then in a virtual server (different port) I have <Directory /> Order deny,allow Allow from 10.1.2.3 Deny from all </Directory> Yet, it appears that all hosts can access /mydocs through the virtual server. Even with a deny for / in a virtual server config, is it true that more specific directory entries *outside* the virtual server config will still be in effect and take precedence?
Isn't this effectively: Order deny,allow Allow from 10.1.2.3 Deny from all Allow from all Mind the order that 'Order' will evaluate the merged directives. -- Eric Covener [EMAIL PROTECTED]
