On Wed, Sep 17, 2008 at 2:06 AM, Prathima Dandapani -X (pdandapa - HCL
at Cisco) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I am running Apache 2.2.9 as a service in windows.
> Can any help me in making Apache to dump core in some directory
> before it crashes.
> Thanks in
Hi All,
I am running Apache 2.2.9 as a service in windows.
Can any help me in making Apache to dump core in some directory
before it crashes.
Thanks in advance.
Regards,
Prathima.
This is my first attempt to compile the Apache web server so I will try
and include all the relevant information and apologize in advance for
any rookie mistakes. I have successfully compiled version 2.2.8 on the
IBM AIX, Sun Solaris, and HP-UX PA-RISC platforms but have an issue
trying to compile
I'm attempting to build the httpd 2.2.8 on an AIX 5.3 system. I'm using
the IBM compiler cc_r. When I run this configuration it configures ok,
though it doesn't find the Expat 1.95.8 I have at /apps/support/packages
while it does find the OpenSSL at the same location.
CC="/usr/vac/bin/cc_r";
OBJEC
13:29
À : users@httpd.apache.org
Objet : [EMAIL PROTECTED] make error
Hello together,
i try to make apache 2.2.6 (i368) under 10.3.
my configure:
./configure --disable-ldap
When i start make, i get the following error (the same without --disable-ldap)
file included from /root/src/httpd-2.2.6/include
pache.org
Objet : [EMAIL PROTECTED] make error
Hello together,
i try to make apache 2.2.6 (i368) under 10.3.
my configure:
./configure --disable-ldap
When i start make, i get the following error (the same without --disable-ldap)
file included from /root/src/httpd-2.2.6/include
Hello together,
i try to make apache 2.2.6 (i368) under 10.3.
my configure:
./configure --disable-ldap
When i start make, i get the following error (the same without --disable-ldap)
file included from /root/src/httpd-2.2.6/include/util_ldap.h:31,
from exports.c:38:
/usr/i
Jim Albert wrote:
For the purposes of testing a heavy load situation, I'd like to
configure one of my apache web servers to intentionally respond slow to
a request.
Is anyone aware of some type of apache sleep or delay configuration that
will easily allow me to configure this? For example, te
On 10/22/07, Jim Albert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> For the purposes of testing a heavy load situation, I'd like to
> configure one of my apache web servers to intentionally respond slow to
> a request.
>
> Is anyone aware of some type of apache sleep or delay configuration that
> will easily allo
Hi,
Try setting the KeepAlive On and with high KeepAliveTimeout value.You can
refer to Apache org docs for the above params.
Thanks
-A
On 10/23/07, Jim Albert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> For the purposes of testing a heavy load situation, I'd like to
> configure one of my apache web servers to
On Mon, 22 Oct 2007 16:54:23 -0400
Jim Albert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> For the purposes of testing a heavy load situation, I'd like to
> configure one of my apache web servers to intentionally respond slow
> to a request.
Don't know why everyone's proposing complex things here.
A simple CGI
Another idea in the same direction:
Use a RewriteMap on every request and have the
rewrite map do something ressuorce intensive.
...
RewriteEngine On
RewriteMapmymap prg:/tmp/tmp.pl
RewriteRule ^/(.*) ${mymap:$1}
And the map /tmp/tmp.pl:
#!/usr/bin/perl -w
use
On Oct 22, 2007, at 7:31 PM, Joshua Slive wrote:
On 10/22/07, Eric Covener <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 10/22/07, Jim Albert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
For the purposes of testing a heavy load situation, I'd like to
configure one of my apache web servers to intentionally respond
slow to
a
On 10/22/07, Eric Covener <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 10/22/07, Jim Albert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > For the purposes of testing a heavy load situation, I'd like to
> > configure one of my apache web servers to intentionally respond slow to
> > a request.
>
> mod_ext_filter might help you
On 10/22/07, Jim Albert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> For the purposes of testing a heavy load situation, I'd like to
> configure one of my apache web servers to intentionally respond slow to
> a request.
mod_ext_filter might help you simulate some of this by adding some
silly perl/php/python as an
Or if you are just benching a page like
http://www.yourdomain.com/test.html you could switch it to test.php
and have it do the sleep for you. Seems a little simple and I am not
sure it's what you are going for exactly.
On 10/22/07, Tom Hart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I don't know about anything
I don't know about anything in apache to do this, but there are a couple
other options that popped into mind, depending on what exactly you're
trying to test.
The first is netlimiter (http://www.netlimiter.com) that will let you
simulate network congestion/low bandwidth scenarios, with a littl
For the purposes of testing a heavy load situation, I'd like to
configure one of my apache web servers to intentionally respond slow to
a request.
Is anyone aware of some type of apache sleep or delay configuration that
will easily allow me to configure this? For example, tell apache to wait
hi
I am installing apache on a new server. the make
command gives me this error:
/usr/include/signal.h:111: error: parse error before
"siginfo_t"
/usr/include/signal.h:113: error: parse error before
"siginfo_t"
make[3]: *** [passwd/apr_getpass.lo] Error 1
make[3]: Leaving directory
`/HTTP/httpd-2
Anyone know a workaround for this problem of installing in an alternate
directory?
/bin/sh /home/user/httpd-2.2.4/srclib/apr/libtool --mode=install
/usr/bin/install -c -m 755 libaprutil-1.la /usr/local/apache2-trac/lib
libtool: install: error: cannot install `libaprutil-1.la' to a directory
not e
Trying to run "make" command with AIX 5.2 and Apache 1.3.37
Environment is set as follows:
_=/usr/bin/env
LANG=en_US
LOGIN=d47cs
PATH=.:/usr/ccs/bin:/usr/vacpp/bin:/usr/bin:/etc:/usr/sbin:/usr/ucb:/usr/bin/X11:/sbin:/usr/java131/jre/bin:/usr/java131/bin:/home/d47cs/apache_1.3.37:/home/d47cs/apa
:23
Aan: users@httpd.apache.org
Onderwerp: [EMAIL PROTECTED] make install does not complete.
Hi all
I have installed a apache webserver ver 2.0.59 for AIX 5.3 at a install
directory /usr/users/sapcs and it worked fine
I am trying to install another instance at /usr/users/sapcsc.The
configure
Hi all
I have installed a apache webserver ver 2.0.59 for AIX 5.3 at a install
directory /usr/users/sapcs and it worked fine
I am trying to install another instance at /usr/users/sapcsc.The configure
and make has been completed succesfully. However when I try to do 'make install'
the op
problem solved - or no errors
did /configure without --enable-so ??
- Original Message -
From: "herauthon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Monday, January 29, 2007 8:42 PM
Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] make error (embryo state user)
> Before i send a load of snipp
From: "Sander Temme" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Monday, January 29, 2007 7:57 PM
Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] make error (embryo state user)
>
> On Jan 29, 2007, at 10:12 AM, herauthon wrote:
>
> >> - On what OS you are trying to compile.
> > ** Net
On Jan 29, 2007, at 10:12 AM, herauthon wrote:
- On what OS you are trying to compile.
** NetBSD 3.1 i386 on P-II MMX 333
Unfortunately, I haven ever had the chance to try compiling Apache on
netbsd.
- What options you gave the "configure" command.
** --enable-so
When you run ./confi
- Original Message -
From: "Krist van Besien" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Monday, January 29, 2007 5:57 PM
Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] make error (embryo state user)
> On 1/29/07, herauthon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > This happens for me a
On Jan 29, 2007, at 7:45 AM, herauthon wrote:
include/apr_portable.h:46:23: #if with no expression
Looks like APR_HAVE_PTHREAD_H is not set, and it's all pear-shaped
from there. This should not happen as it is defined in include/
apr.h, which is generated from include/apr.h.in by ./config
On 1/29/07, herauthon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
This happens for me after make
Please tell us:
- Which version of apache you are trying to compile.
- On what OS you are trying to compile.
- What compiler you are using.
- What options you gave the "configure" command.
that would be a start...
This happens for me after make
___
include/apr_portable.h:46:23: #if with no expression
include/apr_portable.h:151:43: operator '&&' has no right operand
In file included from strings/apr_snprintf.c:23:
include/apr_portable.h:285: error: parse error before '*' token
incl
On 12/14/06, K. Clair <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 12/14/06, Joe Orton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 14, 2006 at 10:04:01AM -0600, K. Clair wrote:
> > I don't think it has anything to do with the installed libraries:
> > httpd-2.0.55 with the same configure options compiles with no er
On 12/14/06, Joe Orton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Thu, Dec 14, 2006 at 10:04:01AM -0600, K. Clair wrote:
> I don't think it has anything to do with the installed libraries:
> httpd-2.0.55 with the same configure options compiles with no errors
> on the same machine.
>
> I also tried to compile
On Thu, Dec 14, 2006 at 10:04:01AM -0600, K. Clair wrote:
> I don't think it has anything to do with the installed libraries:
> httpd-2.0.55 with the same configure options compiles with no errors
> on the same machine.
>
> I also tried to compile httpd-2.0.57, and I got the same make error as
> w
I don't think it has anything to do with the installed libraries:
httpd-2.0.55 with the same configure options compiles with no errors
on the same machine.
I also tried to compile httpd-2.0.57, and I got the same make error as
with 2.0.59. Again, all of this was done on the same system.
Has any
What version of gdbm is installed? Was it perhaps removed in a clean up of
the machine? I know under Debian deborphan always wants to remove
libgdbm-dev
On 12/12/06, K. Clair <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to upgrade apache from 2.0.55 to 2.0.59. We have a
standard configure line t
Hi,
I'm trying to upgrade apache from 2.0.55 to 2.0.59. We have a
standard configure line that we have been using for the entire 2.0.x
release of apache:
./configure --enable-maintainer-mode --enable-proxy
--disable-proxy-connect --disable-proxy-ftp --enable-mods-shared=all
--with-dbm=gdbm --wi
This is probably impossible on principle, as the two URL's could be expected to generate different results.On 17/10/06, Jeff Behl <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:running apache 2.2.x, i'm knocking my head against the table trying to
get mod_cache to ignore the query string in a URL, such that :http://so
running apache 2.2.x, i'm knocking my head against the table trying to
get mod_cache to ignore the query string in a URL, such that :
http://somedomain.comm/asdf.swf?aa
http://somedomain.comm/asdf.swf?bb
will only generate a single cache entry. i've tried using
mod_rewrite to st
Sander,
I just managed to get the whole thing to make and make install without
error. What changed? I used fink to install the latest package available
for openssl on Mac that it had available, the one you cite below, 0.9.7i.
The one that was on this box originally was 0.9.6m. The one I ins
On Sep 29, 2006, at 2:24 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Well it seems autoconf is borked on your box, because it should be
test
compiling to determine if X509_STORE_CTX_set_depth is exported from
OpenSSL. Apparently not, on your build, but autoconf decides it is
successful.
Note that the
Well it seems autoconf is borked on your box, because it should be test
compiling to determine if X509_STORE_CTX_set_depth is exported from
OpenSSL. Apparently not, on your build, but autoconf decides it is
successful.
You can try forcing the ac_cv_ flag for HAVE_X509_STORE_CTX_SET_DEPTH,
I don't
Howdy,
trying to build apache 2.2.3 on a Mac G4 (old, and slow) with OS X 10.4.
I'm trying to build with mod_ssl and a number of other modules, and ran
into the following error:
/usr/bin/ld: Undefined symbols:
_X509_STORE_CTX_set_depth
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
make[1]: *** [httpd]
Dave Floyd wrote:
> 2.0.58 has been released to cure some deficiencies in 2.0.55
> anyway so I suggest downloading:
> http://www.apache.org/dist/httpd/httpd-2.0.58.tar.gz and compiling
> from scratch. Then check the README file to find the reccomended
> version of GCC to use.
>
I have sugges
Krishna,
Use GNU make. Set your path so the GNU make is before the solaris make.
Having said that the much better option would be to download gcc from
www.sunfreeware.com and the latest source from apache.org and compile with
your specific options in configure. Of course use GNU make for this a
Hi,
I downloaded a copy of the same file that you started with.
On looking inside the config.log file, one of the first lines gives
the architecture that it was compiled with:
This file contains any messages produced by compilers while
running configure, to aid debugging if configure makes a
Hi,
I am installing as user root only. Hence I have the permission.
Please suggest.
Regards,
On 5/9/06, Dave Floyd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Well that definitely looks like a source directory, sodisregard my previous note. From your first mail, the first error
seems to be that it did
Hi
Well that definitely looks like a source directory, so
disregard my previous note. From your first mail, the first error
seems to be that it didn't create a file under /tmp. does your user
have adequate permissions to access the directory?
rgds
These are the files available in the htt
On Tue, May 09, 2006 at 02:17:09PM +0530, Krishna Mondal wrote:
> These are the files available in the httpd-2.0.55 directory.
>
> Hence i feel its source package only.
I doubt that:
> -rw-r- 1 1007 104 1921 Oct 10 2005 README.bindist
> -rw-r- 1 1007 104 814
These are the files available in the httpd-2.0.55 directory.
Hence i feel its source package only.
Please suggest.
-rw-r- 1 1007 104 16114 Nov 24 2004 libhttpd.dsp-rw-r- 1 1007 104 367 Nov 24 2004 emacs-style-rw-r- 1 1007 104 10943 Nov 24
On Tue, May 09, 2006 at 01:55:33PM +0530, Krishna Mondal wrote:
> I got it from http://www.apache.org/dist/httpd/binaries/solaris/ location.
So Dave is right. See his answer.
Rainer
I got it from http://www.apache.org/dist/httpd/binaries/solaris/ location.
On 5/9/06, Rainer Sokoll <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Tue, May 09, 2006 at 12:59:52PM +0530, Krishna Mondal wrote:> 1. FTPed the httpd-2.0.55-sparc-sun-solaris2.8.tar.gz
atWhere did you get this from? Sounds to me like a S
Hi,
The name rather gives away the fact that this looks like a
precompiled solaris 8 pkgadd format install. As you have uncompressed
it into /export/home/netiq/apache55inst/, and it has given you a
sub-directory "httpd-2.0.55", it would be installed by:
cd /export/home/netiq/apache55
On Tue, May 09, 2006 at 12:59:52PM +0530, Krishna Mondal wrote:
> 1. FTPed the httpd-2.0.55-sparc-sun-solaris2.8.tar.gz at
Where did you get this from? Sounds to me like a Solaris pkg, not the
source package.
Rainer
-
The offic
Hi,
I am trying to install apache2.0.55 on Solaris8 sparc machine.
These are the steps i followed.
1. FTPed the httpd-2.0.55-sparc-sun-solaris2.8.tar.gz at /export/home/netiq/apache55inst2. >cd /export/home/netiq/apache55inst>gunzip httpd-2.0.55-sparc-sun-solaris2.8.tar.gz . (Got the httpd-2.0.5
Hi,
I am trying to install apache2.0.55 on Solaris8 sparc machine.
These are the steps i followed.
1. FTPed the httpd-2.0.55-sparc-sun-solaris2.8.tar.gz at /export/home/netiq/apache55inst2. >cd /export/home/netiq/apache55inst>gunzip httpd-2.0.55-sparc-sun-solaris2.8.tar.gz . (Got the httpd-2.0.5
Make failed with the errors below. why is it looking in tmp/httpd-2.0.55? Thank you.find: cannot open /tmp/httpd-2.0.55/include/ap_compat.h: No such file or directoryfind: cannot open /tmp/httpd-2.0.55/include/ap_config.h: No such file or directoryfind: cannot open /tmp/httpd-2.0.55/include/ap_conf
Greetings everyone,
I have been running 2.2.0 for a few days and have not had any
problems with
compiling/installing/running until I added in --enable-authnz-ldap to
my configuration.
The configuration I am using is as follows:
./configure --prefix=/usr/local/apache2 --bindir=/usr/bin --sbi
Why don't you grab a pre-compiled package from
http://www.sunfreeware.com
R
--- Jeff Long <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Sorry for the poorly formatted followup here, I just
> joined the list.
>
> Anyway, I'm using Solaris 8, using /usr/ccs/bin/make
> and I get the same
> errors regarding sed.
Sorry for the poorly formatted followup here, I just joined the list.
Anyway, I'm using Solaris 8, using /usr/ccs/bin/make and I get the same
errors regarding sed. From the output it appears to be using the
libtool shipped with 2.2.0 (as I do not have libtool installed on the
system) so am I
Rather than claim solaris make isn't supported (it is) please post the
errors you get? If you are able to make the errors clear, there is a good
chance that it won't be broken by the end of this week.
On libtool, what version do you have installed and from where? It looks
like when you installe
Hello,
When installing apache 2.2.0 on a Sparc Solaris 10 machine, I got the following
warnings...
/export/private/sources/apache/httpd-2.2.0/srclib/apr/libtool --silent
--mode=install cp mod_alias.la /opt/httpd-2.2.0/modules/
sed: command garbled: /^dlname=/{s/.*='\([^']*\)'/\1/;p}
sed: command
> I did find that RM and AWK needed their definitions added
> in httpd-2.0.55/build/config_vars.mk. I'm using gawk-3.1.4
> and getting:
>
> awk -f
>
/export/home/jman/download/src/apache/httpd-2.0.55/srclib/apr/build/make_var
> _export.awk
> /export/home/jman/download/src/apache/httpd-2.0.55/srcli
> I've upgraded gcc to 3.3.2 on Solaris 8x86, and most
> other build tools.(?) I'm now getting:
>
I did find that RM and AWK needed their definitions added
in httpd-2.0.55/build/config_vars.mk. I'm using gawk-3.1.4
and getting:
awk -f
/export/home/jman/download/src/apache/httpd-2.0.55/srclib/
I've upgraded gcc to 3.3.2 on Solaris 8x86, and most
other build tools.(?) I'm now getting:
Undefined first referenced
symbol in file
ap_mpm_run server/.libs/libmain.a(main.o)
ap_send_error_response server/.l
Hi Jon,
I suspect the base cause of your problems is the gcc version.
when I last installed apache on solaris8 x86, I used gcc 3.4.2 and
had no problems. 2.9.5 is very old.
rgds
I'm now trying to install 2.0.55 and receiving the
error below. I'm not using the ksh.
Found newer headers. Wi
On 1/31/06, Jonathan Mangin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Are these kinds of problems too vague or is
> there a better place to ask?
You need to wait a little more than 5 hours before starting to
complain about a lack of response.
It looks to me like you have poorly-installed build tools (a common
Are these kinds of problems too vague or is
there a better place to ask?
- Original Message -
From: "Jonathan Mangin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Tuesday, January 31, 2006 10:31 AM
Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] make error
>
> I've worked around th
Tuesday, January 31, 2006 9:38 AM
Subject: [EMAIL PROTECTED] make error
> I'm now trying to install 2.0.55 and receiving the
> error below. I'm not using the ksh.
>
> Found newer headers. Will rebuild apr.exp.
> -f apr.exp exports.c export_vars.h
> /bin/ksh: -f: n
I'm now trying to install 2.0.55 and receiving the
error below. I'm not using the ksh.
Found newer headers. Will rebuild apr.exp.
-f apr.exp exports.c export_vars.h
/bin/ksh: -f: not found
make[3]: *** [delete-exports] Error 127
make[3]: Leaving directory
`/export/home/jman/download/src/apache/ht
On 12/28/05, Arthur DiSegna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am moving my IIS webserver to Apache on Suse and was wondering how to
> make the web requests case insensitive?
>
> For example.
>
> On IIS the URL is http://vhost1.mydomain.com/directory1
>
> Directory1 one on the file system co
, 2005 1:39 PM
To: users@httpd.apache.org
Subject: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Make Apache Linux paths case insensitive?
Hi Arthur.
I'm working my way through the manual, and from what I've read so far
you may need to match on regular expressions and use mod_rewrite. This
is a powerful alternati
Hi Arthur.
I'm working my way through the manual, and from what I've
read so far you may need to match on regular expressions and
use mod_rewrite. This is a powerful alternative to
hard-coding the directory paths with aliases.
http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.0/misc/rewriteguide.html
HTH - Kei
Hello,
I am moving my IIS webserver to Apache on Suse and was wondering how to
make the web requests case insensitive?
For example.
On IIS the URL is http://vhost1.mydomain.com/directory1
Directory1 one on the file system could be directory1 or Directory1 or
DIRECTORY1 and the site is still a
Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] make URL's case insensitive
I've had good luck using mod_speling. But before that I used a trick
where I used samba. The trick is to run samba, mount a share, then serve
from that share. Samba is case insensitive.
BTW - I agree - in fact I think it's i
I've had good luck using mod_speling. But before that I used a trick
where I used samba. The trick is to run samba, mount a share, then serve
from that share. Samba is case insensitive.
BTW - I agree - in fact I think it's insane to have a case sensitive
file system. But I'll never convince th
Quoting Joshua Slive <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On 10/24/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > RewriteEngine On
> > RewriteMap lc int:tolower
> > RewriteRule (.*) ${lc:$1} [R]
>
> > However, when I try this in apache (2.0.5x), I get the following message
> > returned to me in firefo
Doug McNutt wrote:
At 10:44 -0700 10/24/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote, in part:
. . . as opposed to general case-insensitivity which is
not possible (and, in addition, not advisable, since proxy caches,
search engines, etc are all case sensitive).
Well, Google is case INsensitive and proud of i
On 10/24/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> RewriteEngine On
> RewriteMap lc int:tolower
> RewriteRule (.*) ${lc:$1} [R]
> However, when I try this in apache (2.0.5x), I get the following message
> returned to me in firefox 1.0.7:
>
> redirection limit for this URL exceeded, unabl
At 10:44 -0700 10/24/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote, in part:
> . . . as opposed to general case-insensitivity which is
>not possible (and, in addition, not advisable, since proxy caches,
>search engines, etc are all case sensitive).
Well, Google is case INsensitive and proud of it. I once complained
Quoting Boyle Owen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Nick Kew [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> > It is HTTP, the protocol of the Web, that is case-sensitive.
> > Anything that tries to pretend it's not is broken.
>
> Exactly.
>
> The whole concept of "case-sensitivity
> -Original Message-
> From: Nick Kew [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> It is HTTP, the protocol of the Web, that is case-sensitive.
> Anything that tries to pretend it's not is broken.
Exactly.
The whole concept of "case-sensitivity" is wrong-headed to begin with. The case
of a letter is a
On Friday 21 October 2005 15:11, Bill Parker wrote:
> Well, the goal is to simply make everything in the URL which is received by
> APACHE lower case, as case sensitivity is a(n) issue on unix/linux/etc. In
> windows it doesn't matter, since filenames are case insensitive (hope that
> clears up th
On 10/21/05, Bill Parker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Well, the goal is to simply make everything in the URL which is received by
> APACHE lower case, as case sensitivity is a(n) issue on unix/linux/etc. In
> windows it doesn't matter, since filenames are case insensitive (hope that
> clears up th
From: "Joshua Slive" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Thursday, October 20, 2005 9:44 AM
Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] make URL's case insensitive
On 10/20/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi All,
>
>I run apache 2.0.5x, and was wondering if
On 10/20/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi All,
>
>I run apache 2.0.5x, and was wondering if there is a way to make URL's
> (after
> the domain portion) case insensitive in apache (all URL's), for example:
>
> www.foobar.com/JUNKFOOD.htm (client browser)
>
> would be proces
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi All,
I run apache 2.0.5x, and was wondering if there is a way to make URL's (after
the domain portion) case insensitive in apache (all URL's), for example:
www.foobar.com/JUNKFOOD.htm (client browser)
would be processed by httpd as:
www.foobar.com/junkfood.htm
On Thursday 20 October 2005 08:33, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi All,
>
>I run apache 2.0.5x, and was wondering if there is a way to make URL's
> (after the domain portion) case insensitive in apache (all URL's), for
> example:
>
> www.foobar.com/JUNKFOOD.htm (client browser)
>
> would be proce
Hi All,
I run apache 2.0.5x, and was wondering if there is a way to make URL's (after
the domain portion) case insensitive in apache (all URL's), for example:
www.foobar.com/JUNKFOOD.htm (client browser)
would be processed by httpd as:
www.foobar.com/junkfood.htm (server side)
In reading th
Title: Make
When I do a make on http-2.0.54 I get the following error:
I am configuring with LDFLAGS="-lresolv" \
./configure --enable-modules=so --enable-ssl --with-ssl=/usr/local/ssl/include
ssl_engine_pphrase.c:684: error: for each function it appears in.)
*** Error code 1
make: Fa
On Sun, 7 Aug 2005, maohai huang wrote:
Well, presumably, in order to read the URL string from the user agent
you'd have to answer the connection. So already there's a server running,
obviously.
And it greatly breaks the protocol to just close the connection without
sending some sort of err
hi,
For security reasons I would like to know how to
configure apache on my.host.com such that when
someone tries http://my.host.com or
http://my.host.com/
there will be no response from the server at all,
just like there is no server running, but
http://my.host.com/foo or http://my.host.com/foo/
91 matches
Mail list logo
