Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] apache 2.2 and php 5 problem

2006-05-01 Thread Ken Murach
, you wrote: On Monday 01 May 2006 19:21, Ken Murach wrote: > > AddType application/x-httpd-php .php .phtml > AddType application/x-httpd-php-source .phps > Oh dear. That cargo-cult is deeply BAD for two reasons. That abuse of AddType was wrong in Apache 1.1, and ever

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] apache 2.2 and php 5 problem

2006-05-01 Thread Ken Murach
0200, you wrote: On Mon, May 01, 2006 at 02:00:08PM -0400, Ken Murach wrote: >BASEDIR: /usr/local Remember your ldd's output: libxml2.so.2 => /lib/libxml2.so.2 You see? Rainer - The official User-To-Use

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] apache 2.2 and php 5 problem

2006-05-01 Thread Ken Murach
, 2006 at 01:32:42PM -0400, Ken Murach wrote: > Hi Rainier, > > I would imagine it should be ok? I didn't have any problems with same php > 5.0.5 for the apache 1.3.34 installation. The ./httpd -t command works fine > for that version. > > Do you think I should I should g

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] apache 2.2 and php 5 problem

2006-05-01 Thread Ken Murach
+0200, you wrote: On Mon, May 01, 2006 at 01:02:15PM -0400, Ken Murach wrote: > libxml2.so.2 => /lib/libxml2.so.2 Is this lib recent enough for php5? Rainer - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] apache 2.2 and php 5 problem

2006-05-01 Thread Ken Murach
ire-V210/lib/libmd5_psr.so.1 Thanks Kenny At 06:52 PM 5/1/2006 +0200, you wrote: On Mon, May 01, 2006 at 12:34:29PM -0400, Ken Murach wrote: > itis-padlproxy1 # ./httpd -t > httpd: Syntax error on line 53 of /usr/local/apache2/conf/httpd.conf: > Cannot load /usr/local/apache2/modules/l

[EMAIL PROTECTED] apache 2.2 and php 5 problem

2006-05-01 Thread Ken Murach
Hi everyone, Does anyone know if there are issues between apache 2.2.0 and php 5.0.5 for Solaris unix?? I've recently installed apache 2.2.0 which was working fine. I then added the php 5.0.5 piece and now when I run the httpd -t command to verify syntax is still OK, I get the following the

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Weblogic module and apache 1.3.33 question

2006-03-28 Thread Ken Murach
Thank you Alex for the info. I will check it out. Much appreciated Kenny At 07:56 PM 3/28/2006 +0200, you wrote: Hi, On Die 28.03.2006 12:47, Ken Murach wrote: I then started up this apache 1.3.33 instanace but got the following message upon start up: apollo1 # ./apachectl start [Tue Mar

[EMAIL PROTECTED] Weblogic module and apache 1.3.33 question

2006-03-28 Thread Ken Murach
Hi everyone, Recently I was asked to install apache 1.3.33 on a solaris unix server to replace existing apache 1.3.31. I configured the 1.3.33 to be the same as the 1.3.31 (same modules compiled in statically with the addition of a few new modules in 1.3.33). Now the 1.3.31 uses the mod_wl.s

[EMAIL PROTECTED] apache 2.0.54 rotatelogs compilation question

2006-03-24 Thread Ken Murach
Does anyone know if it's possible to configure apache 2.0.54 without having the rotatelogs function compiled in??? Thanks Kenny - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See http://httpd.apa

[EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.0.54 rotate logs problem

2006-03-24 Thread Ken Murach
Hi everyone, Was wondering if there is a work around solution to apache 2.0.54 and rotatelogs?? Currently having a problem trying to start up apache 2.0.54 with the rotatelogs function. This function does not retain the value of the LD_LIBRARY_PATH variable and when we try to start this apache

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] apache/php question

2006-01-04 Thread Ken Murach
Thank you Gary for the info. I will look into that. Much appreciated. Kenny At 08:31 AM 1/4/2006 -0800, you wrote: You can try running it on an alternate port side by side and do your testing that way, assuming that you active site uses relative URLs. > -Original Message- > Fro

[EMAIL PROTECTED] apache/php question

2006-01-04 Thread Ken Murach
Hi everyone, I'm relatively new at apache/php and I've just installed/built apache 1.3.33 with php-4.4.0 as static. The build was successful and I've run the following commands: itis-appdev # pwd /usr/local/apache_1.3.33_ssl/bin itis-appdev # ./httpd -t Syntax OK itis-appdev # ./httpd -l Co

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] apache 1.3.28 not starting up - no errors??

2005-12-16 Thread Ken Murach
start the command with "strace" or your local dialect's tool of choice. That way you will see the error killing your process. hope this helps, Christian On Tue, Dec 13, 2005 at 01:11:08PM -0500, Ken Murach wrote: > Hi everyone, > > I have a user who starts up apache 1.

[EMAIL PROTECTED] apache 1.3.28 not starting up - no errors??

2005-12-13 Thread Ken Murach
Hi everyone, I have a user who starts up apache 1.3.28 by running a script and giving the script the argument of start This was working, but now the user is unable to get this to start up anymore?? Even as root, I am unable to start this up and there are no errors being recorded in the error

[EMAIL PROTECTED] apache errors

2005-12-05 Thread Ken Murach
Hi everyone, I'm relatively new to apache and was wondering what do these errors mean?? [Thu Dec 01 16:45:12 2005] [warn] (128)Network is unreachable: connect to listener on [::]:80 [Thu Dec 01 16:45:12 2005] [notice] child pid 275 exit signal Segmentation fault (11), possible coredump in /usr

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] apache 1.3.33 multiple instances problem

2005-11-28 Thread Ken Murach
Thank you Axel for your help. I will look into what you said on both the pid possible problem and and running the truss command with the -f option for more information. Thanks again Kenny At 11:02 AM 11/24/2005 +0100, you wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] logs]$ tail error.log [Tue Nov 22 11:27:59 20

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] apache 1.3.33 multiple instances problem

2005-11-22 Thread Ken Murach
then echo "HTTPD is not running, or pid file was shot dead." else /usr/bin/kill $pid fi ;; 'restart') $0 stop $0 start ;; *) echo "Usage: $0 { start | stop | restart }" exi

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] apache 1.3.33 multiple instances problem

2005-11-22 Thread Ken Murach
o why I can start up 1.3.33 as root and be able to start up multiple instances, but it won't start up for non-root user itisgrp?? Kenny At 11:22 AM 11/22/2005 -0500, you wrote: On 11/22/05, Ken Murach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi everyone, > > My name is Ken Murach and I'

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] apache 1.3.33 multiple instances problem

2005-11-22 Thread Ken Murach
ow do I run it?? Thanks again Joshua for your time Kenny At 11:22 AM 11/22/2005 -0500, you wrote: On 11/22/05, Ken Murach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi everyone, > > My name is Ken Murach and I'm relatively new to the apache world. I'm a > unix administrator and I w

[EMAIL PROTECTED] apache 1.3.33 multiple instances problem

2005-11-22 Thread Ken Murach
Hi everyone, My name is Ken Murach and I'm relatively new to the apache world. I'm a unix administrator and I was recently asked to install apache 1.3.33 on one of our servers. I was able to install/configure apache 1.3.33 successfully. However, the user itisgrp is unable to st