Re: [users@httpd] Logging Base64 decoded info in access_log

2013-07-26 Thread Jignesh Badani
pen source http://www.openstrike.co.uk/ or call 01722 770036 / 07092 020107 [attachment "attnm6va.dat" deleted by Jignesh Badani/MMSA/MMCX] <>

[users@httpd] Logging Base64 decoded info in access_log

2013-07-25 Thread Jignesh Badani
Hello, we have a custom user tracker cookie which is currently Base64 encoded and gets tacked along to each request in the access log. We now have a new requirement to store the decoded value in the access log instead. So cookie gets written to the user's browser encoded, but when a user makes a

Re: [us...@httpd] a chain of proxy servers

2010-08-05 Thread Jignesh Badani
wow, this is getting racist, OP, please delete this whole thread if possible. James is no white, he is one stupid Indian (at least from his last name) who does not understand the value of Open Source. And the simple fact that the docs here are purely a reference guide with some exceptions. You

Re: [us...@httpd] TCP Connections per hostname?

2009-09-23 Thread Jignesh Badani
ot; http://blogs.msdn.com/ie/archive/2005/04/11/407189.aspx regards - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Jignesh Badani From: raulmt To: users@httpd.apache.org Date: 09/06/2009 02:36 PM Subject: [us...@httpd] TCP Connections per hostname? Hi, I use A

Re: [us...@httpd] TCP Connections per hostname?

2009-09-23 Thread Jignesh Badani
If I understand your question right, I believe most browsers open 2 or 3 max TCP connections per host/domain. regards - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - JB From: raulmt To: users@httpd.apache.org Date: 09/06/2009 02:36 PM Subject: [us...@httpd] TC

[us...@httpd] Industry Acceptable % of Timeout failures (502s)

2009-09-23 Thread Jignesh Badani
Hello, is there an industry standard for acceptable % of Timeout related failures on one's website ? We have a server farm of 3 Apache RP proxying almost everything to the back-end content and app farms of about 40-50 servers. The user base is small but fairly active (about 2.5mil hits per day

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Is this possible ?

2006-08-23 Thread Jignesh Badani
ke to know that. We are still trying to figure out a way so that F5s would retain the original IP and not act like a Proxy. The Radwares it replaced did not do that. regards - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Jignesh Badani "Joshua Slive"

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Is this possible ?

2006-08-23 Thread Jignesh Badani
how ? Thanks - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Jignesh Badani "Joshua Slive" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 08/23/2006 05:10 PM Please respond to users@httpd.apache.org To users@httpd.apache.org cc Subject Re: [EMAI

[EMAIL PROTECTED] Is this possible ?

2006-08-23 Thread Jignesh Badani
inorder to get access. Can I form such an expression in SetEnvIf ? If so how ? Thank you - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Jignesh Badani - The official User-To-User support forum of

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mod_security general question...

2006-08-23 Thread Jignesh Badani
ity general question... Jignesh Badani wrote: > Thanks Nick, it makes sense. So can I assume that the Apache group is fine > with its user base using 3rd party mod_security Why not? http://modules.apache.org/ - lots of modules - we have no problem with users deploying any module which

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mod_security general question...

2006-08-22 Thread Jignesh Badani
" and he talks/writes a lot about mod_security. regards - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Jignesh Badani Nick Kew <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 08/22/2006 04:28 PM Please respond to users@httpd.apache.org To users@httpd.apache.org cc Su

[EMAIL PROTECTED] mod_security general question...

2006-08-22 Thread Jignesh Badani
implemented the same along with Netegrity (CA) Siteminder Web Agent module and in production ? If so, does it add too much of a overhead ? Thanks - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Jignesh Badani

[EMAIL PROTECTED] Using "AND" condition in SetEnvIf and Allow from directives...

2006-08-22 Thread Jignesh Badani
Can I form such an expression in SetEnvIf ? If so how ? Thank you - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Jignesh Badani - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Serv

Fw: [EMAIL PROTECTED] False "Out of Memory" errors - on new Suse Linux SLES 9.1 - Apache 2.0.54 - Blade servers running 4 GB of RAM

2006-01-27 Thread Jignesh Badani
Can somebody me in debugging the "Out of Memory" error we have been having... regards - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Jignesh Badani Intranet/Extranet Technical Services - Forwarded by Jignesh Badani/MMSA/MMCX on 01/27/200

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] False "Out of Memory" errors - on new Suse Linux SLES 9.1 - Apache 2.0.54 - Blade servers running 4 GB of RAM

2006-01-24 Thread Jignesh Badani
? regards - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Jignesh Badani Intranet/Extranet Technical Services [EMAIL PROTECTED] 01/24/2006 12:57 AM Please respond to users@httpd.apache.org To users@httpd.apache.org cc Subject Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] False "Out of Memory"

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] False "Out of Memory" errors - on new Suse Linux SLES 9.1 - Apache 2.0.54 - Blade servers running 4 GB of RAM

2006-01-23 Thread Jignesh Badani
Thanks Kieth, well I learned something new, but no I do not have the parameter set anywhere in my conf. So MaxMemFree should be unlimited, right ? regards - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Jignesh Badani Intranet/Extranet Technical Services

[EMAIL PROTECTED] False "Out of Memory" errors - on new Suse Linux SLES 9.1 - Apache 2.0.54 - Blade servers running 4 GB of RAM

2006-01-23 Thread Jignesh Badani
. regards - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Jignesh Badani Intranet/Extranet Technical Services - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache2.0.48 Illegal instruction & Segmentation fault issues

2005-09-27 Thread Jignesh Badani
BM. regards - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Jignesh Badani Intranet/Extranet Technical Services Geoff Thorpe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 09/26/2005 08:50 PM To users@httpd.apache.org cc Jignesh Badani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject Re: [EMAIL

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache2.0.48 Illegal instruction & Segmentation fault issues

2005-09-27 Thread Jignesh Badani
t issues On Tuesday 27 September 2005 03:36, Jignesh Badani wrote: > Greetings Folks, > > We have been running pretty smoothly 3 instances each of Apache2 (2 of > them on 2.0.48 and the 3rd one is running 2.0.51) for over an year now on > 2 load balanced Solaris 8 (SunFire 48

[EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache2.0.48 Illegal instruction & Segmentation fault issues

2005-09-26 Thread Jignesh Badani
he-file=/export/home/x/install/apache_openssl/httpd-2.0.48e/config.cache" \ "$@" regards - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Jignesh Badani Intranet/Extranet Technical Services - The official User-To-User support forum of the

RE: [users@httpd] 2 Gig Apache File Size Limit...

2005-06-24 Thread Jignesh Badani
I believe it is the current version (2.0x) limitation You may want to check this out: http://httpd.apache.org/docs-2.1/new_features_2_2.html New Features in Apache 2.1/2.2 -- Large File Support httpd is now built with support for files larger than

[users@httpd] Re: Dynamic refreshing of Proxy Rules

2005-06-24 Thread Jignesh Badani
e Heer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 06/24/2005 02:18 PM Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To "Jignesh Badani" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> cc users@httpd.apache.org Subject Re: Dynamic refreshing of Proxy Rules > It would be nice to have Apache reload proxy rules at regula

[users@httpd] Dynamic refreshing of Proxy Rules

2005-06-23 Thread Jignesh Badani
I have been using mod_proxy since the 1.3x version and am yet to see this feature implemented in Apache. Why is it so difficult ? We often expose new backend applications, scripts. content on a daily basis and it is a pain to remind myself to bounce the server late in the evening and test to ma

Re: [users@httpd] https redirect

2005-06-23 Thread Jignesh Badani
Shawn, this does not make sense. In the new server design you want: ServerOld (https) IP Address 1 https://www.domain.com ServerNew (http)IP Address 2 http://www.domain.com So inorder for this to work, you will need to implement s

RE: [users@httpd] Questions about reverse proxy with https

2005-06-23 Thread Jignesh Badani
s to your virtual in addition to the one above: SSLProxyVerify optional_no_ca SSLProxyVerifyDepth 1 The above tells mod_proxy that the backend may or may not present a valid cert from a trusted CA ! Thanks - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Jign

Re: [users@httpd] Problem redirecting http to https

2005-06-21 Thread Jignesh Badani
Sorry for the confusion, partly caused by Joost 3 identical replies to my post. Got it !! Thanks - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Jignesh Badani Jignesh Badani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 06/21/2005 03:49 PM Please respond to users@httpd.apac

Re: [users@httpd] Problem redirecting http to https

2005-06-21 Thread Jignesh Badani
nks in our HTML response. We just want to be able to Rewrite the URL request. <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<< End - My original post >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks - - - - - - - - -

Re: [users@httpd] Problem redirecting http to https

2005-06-15 Thread Jignesh Badani
We have a similar problem. We have always been doing it the Virtual host way (virtual on port 80 redirects (permanant) to virtual on 443). In my Virtual host for port 80, I have: Redirect permanent / https://www.mysite.com/home/index.htm But this works fine only for the root (/) req

[users@httpd] How to dump the complete HTTP Proxy Request and Response to/from a backend server ?

2005-05-27 Thread Jignesh Badani
Re-submitting with a valid Subject line ! Jignesh Badani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 05/27/2005 03:12 PM Please respond to users@httpd.apache.org To users@httpd.apache.org cc Subject Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Need help with #if DEBUGGING in proxy_http.c Thanks Tejas for your response. I

Re: [users@httpd] Need help with #if DEBUGGING in proxy_http.c

2005-05-27 Thread Jignesh Badani
including the headers and the body. Thanks - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Jignesh Badani "Tejas Sanghavi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 05/26/2005 01:57 AM Please respond to users@httpd.apache.org To cc Subject Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED

[users@httpd] Jignesh Badani/MMSA/MMCX is out of the office.

2005-05-26 Thread Jignesh Badani
back. Thanks -Jignesh Badani - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] " from th

Re: [users@httpd] Need help with #if DEBUGGING in proxy_http.c

2005-05-25 Thread Jignesh Badani
response from the backend including the headers and the body. Thanks - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Jignesh Badani Intranet/Extranet Technical Services Mitsubishi Motors North America Cypress, CA, 90630 (W) - 714-934-3563 Jignesh Badani

[users@httpd] Need help with #if DEBUGGING in proxy_http.c

2005-05-25 Thread Jignesh Badani
dbytes: %#x", getpid(), readbytes); } #endif Also, strangely enough, only mod_proxy module is using the #if DEBUGGING pre-compiler flag, why !? Thanks - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -