Re: [users@httpd] Is it true that Nginx is faster, more secure and better than Apache?

On 2023-10-04 14:01, Antony Stone wrote: On Wednesday 04 October 2023 at 20:48:19, Jason Long wrote: Hello,Thanks again.Why has Apache Foundation never tested Apache performance with Nginx? I am not affiliated with the Apache Foundation in any way, but I would guess that the primary reason is

Re: [users@httpd] Is it true that Nginx is faster, more secure and better than Apache?

On Wednesday 04 October 2023 at 20:48:19, Jason Long wrote: > Hello,Thanks again.Why has Apache Foundation never tested Apache > performance with Nginx? I am not affiliated with the Apache Foundation in any way, but I would guess that the primary reason is that one can make statistics say almost

RE: [users@httpd] Is it true that Nginx is faster, more secure and better than Apache?

I know that with nginx you can't configure your chain certificate separately, super annoying. > > Hello, > Thanks again. > Why has Apache Foundation never tested Apache performance with Nginx? > > > > > On Sat, Sep 30, 2023 at 12:00 PM, Frank Gingras >wrote: > There might

Re: [users@httpd] Is it true that Nginx is faster, more secure and better than Apache?

Hello,Thanks again.Why has Apache Foundation never tested Apache performance with Nginx? On Sat, Sep 30, 2023 at 12:00 PM, Frank Gingras wrote: There might be some online, however, due to the different architectures, they are not likely to be terribly useful. Do avoid the ones that bash

Re: [users@httpd] Is it true that Nginx is faster, more secure and better than Apache?

Hello,Thank you so much for your reply.Is the following sentence correct? "If you did make mod_php thread safe, it wouldn’t change the fact that you’re going to blow up your memory usage as Apache will load PHP into every single worker process that spins up." On Sun, Oct 1, 2023 at 12:26

Re: [users@httpd] proxying SSL -> SSL

First, do not define vhosts as :PORT, but rather either *:443 or IP:443. Secondly, to proxy from TLS to TLS, you need both SSLEngine on and SSLProxyEngine on. Avoid proxying from a block, unless strictly necessary. Use the vhost context. You can use the Location block to set headers instead. La

Re: [users@httpd] proxying SSL -> SSL

On 04/10/2023 10:40, lejeczek wrote: Hi guys. I've sroogled & have found people suggesting working examples, I thought I had some notes but now I'm thinking I read that it should not work.. so I'm not sure what to think of this seemingly setup:   ServerAdmin web...@lemko.xyz   ServerName

RE: [users@httpd] proxying SSL -> SSL

> > Hi guys. > > I've sroogled & have found people suggesting working examples, I thought I > had some notes but now I'm thinking I read that it should not work.. > so I'm not sure what to think of this seemingly setup: > > > ServerAdmin web...@lemko.xyz > ServerNa

[users@httpd] proxying SSL -> SSL

Hi guys. I've sroogled & have found people suggesting working examples, I thought I had some notes but now I'm thinking I read that it should not work.. so I'm not sure what to think of this seemingly setup:   ServerAdmin web...@lemko.xyz   ServerName siem.mine.priv   ErrorLog /var/log/http