Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] apache 5 x load, 15 x CPU load - whats happening ?

2008/11/11 André Warnier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > dave selby wrote: > [...] >> >> OK ... I did not realize that there would be competition, the CPU load >> is not 100% so I don't understand why apache and firefox would be >> competing ? >> > It is a bit difficult to tell what is really happening, whi

[EMAIL PROTECTED] proxy problems **** glibc detected ****

Hello all, After many days of work, and docs read I have manage to get it work. Is a apache 2.2.10 compiled from source on a Centos 5 64b architecture as a reverse proxy. As a MPM I use prefork. There are still minor problems like disk_cache but but nothing to worry . And when all the things s

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Upgrade to new version of rotatelogs binary without upgrading to new httpd package

Doesn't solve the bug. rotatelogs was never broken, it was a combination of apr and httpd, which you must upgrade to 1.2.8 (or 1.3.4) and 2.0.63. Anurag Gujral wrote: > As per below ticket > https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44783 > > There was memory issue with rotatelogs whic

[EMAIL PROTECTED] Upgrade to new version of rotatelogs binary without upgrading to new httpd package

As per below ticket https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44783 There was memory issue with rotatelogs which got fixed earlier this year. I have started seeing this problem recently. I am currently using httpd-2.0.59 ,I want to change the rotatelogs binaries to the new binary is it

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] apache 5 x load, 15 x CPU load - whats happening ?

dave selby wrote: [...] OK ... I did not realize that there would be competition, the CPU load is not 100% so I don't understand why apache and firefox would be competing ? It is a bit difficult to tell what is really happening, which is why it may be better trying to isolate the different asp

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] apache 5 x load, 15 x CPU load - whats happening ?

> I am not the specialist here, but just looking at your two top displays > above, am I right in suspecting that you are running this XmlHttpRequest > test from a firefox browser which runs on the same machine as the Apache you > are testing ? Yep, thats the case if that is the case, it would be

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] apache 5 x load, 15 x CPU load - whats happening ?

dave selby wrote: Hi All, I have apache2 running AOK serving a web page that calls a xmlhttp request every second and downloads a jpeg image approx 28k every second. top reveals ... 3.3% CPU and 0.8% Memory 16089 dave 20 0 241m 85m 29m R 7.3 6.8 6:32.20 firefox-2-bin 31187 www-da

[EMAIL PROTECTED] apache 5 x load, 15 x CPU load - whats happening ?

Hi All, I have apache2 running AOK serving a web page that calls a xmlhttp request every second and downloads a jpeg image approx 28k every second. top reveals ... 3.3% CPU and 0.8% Memory 16089 dave 20 0 241m 85m 29m R 7.3 6.8 6:32.20 firefox-2-bin 31187 www-data 20 0 24956 10

Re: [us...@httpd] Ubuntu - Apache replies "Could not reliably determine the server's fully qualified..."

I resolved this by creating the file /etc/apache2/conf.d/fqdn with following line as content: ServerName localhost I am using Ubuntu 8.04 Hardy Heron. Chandresh Eric Covener wrote: > > On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 4:02 AM, Pierre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Hello, >> >> I installed Apache 2 just

[EMAIL PROTECTED] Re: High "sending reply" count, server stops responding

Wow so no help? No one has any ideas on what might be going on? Is this even the correct forum to try and get help? Would it help if I mentioned I can not duplicate this in my DEV nor QA server environment? That only the production servers are seeing this issue and the only difference from Prod and

[EMAIL PROTECTED] url string search and replace

Hi, Does anyone know a simple way to do this? I'm trying to test a replacement web server hosting about 200 sites. To avoid absolute links referring users back to the original server I'd like to do a rewrite or output filtering on the fly to search urls for a given string (the name of the or

[EMAIL PROTECTED] basic authentication under apace 2.2.8

Hi, I'm having problems getting this working and I could really use some advice! I'm upgrading from apache 2.0 and trying to trying to get basic authentication working against a db (AuthBasicProvider file works fine) My problem's with: AuthBasicProvider dbm AuthDBMUserFile /usr/local/webacces

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Can't access site outside local network?

On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 3:40 PM, Josuel Padua <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > I just installed/configured apache on my pc (XP). I needed a server for my > small site that uses mysql. I can view the site with no problems inside the > local network, the problem is I can't get anything when I try

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Can't access site outside local network?

even if the isp blocks ports you can still modify the ports that apache/httpd uses. you'll probably need to port forward these at your router (you do have a router, right!!) you'll also need to remember to use your new port when directly accessing your website. you could also check out the dyn

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Can't access site outside local network?

On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 9:40 AM, Josuel Padua <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > I just installed/configured apache on my pc (XP). I needed a server for my > small site that uses mysql. I can view the site with no problems inside the > local network, the problem is I can't get anything when I try

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2.2.9 overriding AuthBasicProvider ldap with .htaccess files

On Mon, Nov 10, 2008 at 11:12 PM, Admin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi all. > > I'm trying to convert an apache 2.0 config to 2.2 where the > section in httpd.conf configures access via ldap, and an .htaccess file > overrides that setting for a particular subdirectory of that space. > > Here's wh

[EMAIL PROTECTED] Can't access site outside local network?

Hi, I just installed/configured apache on my pc (XP). I needed a server for my small site that uses mysql. I can view the site with no problems inside the local network, the problem is I can't get anything when I try to access it from outside the network. I can ping the IP but can't view any of th

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] DirectoryIndex including index.cgi with CGI PATH_INFO

On Tue, 2008-11-11 at 13:24 +0100, Jan Sievers wrote: > Hi everyone, > > I can't find a clear statement in the Apache 2.2 documentation about the > following scenario: > > I have the following configuration for index files: > > DirectoryIndex index.cgi > > > The request > > domain

[EMAIL PROTECTED] DirectoryIndex including index.cgi with CGI PATH_INFO

Hi everyone, I can't find a clear statement in the Apache 2.2 documentation about the following scenario: I have the following configuration for index files: DirectoryIndex index.cgi The request domain.tld/dir_containing_index_cgi/ works as expected. Now, since CGI defines t

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache and writing to NFS

Frank Kimbell wrote: I tried that, and get this: [EMAIL PROTECTED] web]# su apache bash-3.00$ cd /website/nfs-directory bash: cd: /website/nfs-directory: Stale NFS file handle So also on the shell line, it gives this error... What I forgot to mention is that, when I do this as root, I get no

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache and writing to NFS

> I tried that, and get this: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] web]# su apache > bash-3.00$ cd /website/nfs-directory > bash: cd: /website/nfs-directory: Stale NFS file handle > > So also on the shell line, it gives this error... What I forgot to mention is that, when I do this as root, I get no problems...

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache and writing to NFS

Hi, thanks for your reply. I tried that, and get this: [EMAIL PROTECTED] web]# su apache bash-3.00$ cd /website/nfs-directory bash: cd: /website/nfs-directory: Stale NFS file handle So also on the shell line, it gives this error... --