Foo JH wrote:
I'm running it with both PHP5 and mod_perl, without any problems, and
I am using the binary (no recompile here, no M$ visual studio)
A success story! Perhaps you can share with me your setup process:
1. Are you installing from WAMP, or via direct binary download from
Apache?
Hi,
I have installed Apache 2.0.58 on RHEL 5.0.(Red Hat Linux Enterprise edition
5.0)
Also i have configured it with SSL.
I am able to access the webserver page with "HTTP" port but am not able to
access with "HTTPS" port.
I have checked the logs, i am getting this message
I'm running it with both PHP5 and mod_perl, without any problems, and
I am using the binary (no recompile here, no M$ visual studio)
A success story! Perhaps you can share with me your setup process:
1. Are you installing from WAMP, or via direct binary download from Apache?
2. Are you using
Jess Holle wrote:
> William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
>> morgan gangwere wrote:
>>
>>> i will agree that the win32 version of apache is *godly* stable - im
>>> running somwthing like 2.2.3 win32 - a nice stable version.
>>>
>> Note that 2.2.4 fixed a *number* of bugs (and introduced one into Win2
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
morgan gangwere wrote:
i will agree that the win32 version of apache is *godly* stable - im
running somwthing like 2.2.3 win32 - a nice stable version.
Note that 2.2.4 fixed a *number* of bugs (and introduced one into Win2000,
the flaw of resolving all client
On Tue, 29 May 2007 23:25:54 -0400
"Tony Guadagno" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
> I am a little confused, this statement seems to imply that the
> database drivers for mod_dbd can be loaded dynamically
>
> http://people.apache.org/~niq/dbd.html
You can build APR to enable that. But this i
morgan gangwere wrote:
> i will agree that the win32 version of apache is *godly* stable - im
> running somwthing like 2.2.3 win32 - a nice stable version.
Note that 2.2.4 fixed a *number* of bugs (and introduced one into Win2000,
the flaw of resolving all clients as 0.0.0.0 - disable win32 accept
Foo JH wrote:
Hey Sam,
Just to check: are you running Apache 2.2 only from the binary, w/o
any PHP/ modperl addons?
Ummm, actually Win32 Apache 2.2 is *VERY* stable, my current server
is running on an XP home box (so shoot me) and has been up over six
months! I have never seen anything su
Hi,
I am a little confused, this statement seems to imply that the database
drivers for mod_dbd can be loaded dynamically
http://people.apache.org/~niq/dbd.html
DBD Drivers
APR DBD Drivers are currently available for PostgreSQL and SQLite within
SVN. The apr_dbd architecture supports dy
Hello morgan,
Ya Know, i have an apache WAMP5 box runnin on xp home too! and other
than net downtime and power outages, its been up ~3mo!
i will agree that the win32 version of apache is *godly* stable - im
running somwthing like 2.2.3 win32 - a nice stable version.
Yes I am enjoying Apache o
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Foo JH wrote:
> Hey Sam,
>
> Just to check: are you running Apache 2.2 only from the binary, w/o any
> PHP/ modperl addons?
>> Ummm, actually Win32 Apache 2.2 is *VERY* stable, my current server is
>> running on an XP home box (so shoot me) and has be
Hey Sam,
Just to check: are you running Apache 2.2 only from the binary, w/o any
PHP/ modperl addons?
Ummm, actually Win32 Apache 2.2 is *VERY* stable, my current server is
running on an XP home box (so shoot me) and has been up over six
months! I have never seen anything such as that exit st
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Nat Colley wrote:
> I got a wamp stack from a developer, and I have not been able to make
> vhosts work. While recognizing it is entirely possible I did something wrong,
> I notice that in this configuration he has changed the files the web is
> s
Foo JH wrote:
Hello all,
I've been using Apache 2.2 for Win32 (with modperl) for some time. But
one thing bugs me quite often. That is: once in a while (quite
randomly), Apache will produce the following error:
[Mon Mar 05 21:19:47 2007] [notice] Parent: child process exited with
status 32
Hello all,
I've been using Apache 2.2 for Win32 (with modperl) for some time. But
one thing bugs me quite often. That is: once in a while (quite
randomly), Apache will produce the following error:
[Mon Mar 05 21:19:47 2007] [notice] Parent: child process exited with
status 3221225477 -- Rest
On 29 May 2007, at 22:31, Marc Perkel wrote:
I'm running FC6 and added mod_security using the default rule set
and the load level on the system is about 5 times higher than
without it. I'm wondering what rule sets I might disable that would
give me some security without slowing the server
Now serving a self-imposed email probation of 24h for two flubbed
responses in the same thread.
--
Eric Covener
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project.
See http://httpd.apac
thank you muchly. :)
Ricky Zhou wrote:
> Scott Wilcox wrote:
>
>> and this works fine. The thing is, I have a directory inside this path,
>> called "data" which I need to allow all users access too. Is this
>> possible, and if so, how can I do it?
>>
>
> Allow from all
> Satisfy Any
>
On 5/29/07, Eric Covener <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Isn't this effectively:
Order deny,allow
Allow from 10.1.2.3
Deny from all
Allow from all
Mind the order that 'Order' will evaluate the merged directives.
That was all pretty poorly presented. Your 'allow all' is evaluated
after your 'deny
On 5/29/07, Pedro LaWrench <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
In my main server, I allow all with
Order allow,deny
Allow all
Then in a virtual server (different port) I have
Order deny,allow
Allow from 10.1.2.3
Deny from all
Yet, it appears that all hosts can access /mydocs through the virtual
ser
Scott Wilcox wrote:
> and this works fine. The thing is, I have a directory inside this path,
> called "data" which I need to allow all users access too. Is this
> possible, and if so, how can I do it?
Allow from all
Satisfy Any
(See http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.2/mod/core.html#satisfy)
H
hey folks.
If I have the root of a virtual protected with:
DocumentRoot /path/to/dir
ServerName bob
AuthType Basic
AuthName "Network Services"
AuthBasicProvider file
AuthUserFile /path/to/file
--- Joshua Slive <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 5/29/07, Pedro LaWrench <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > In my main server, I allow all with
> >
> > Order allow,deny
> > Allow all
> >
> >
> > Then in a virtual server (different port) I have
> >
> > Order deny,allow
> > Allow from 10.1.2.3
> > D
I'm running FC6 and added mod_security using the default rule set and
the load level on the system is about 5 times higher than without it.
I'm wondering what rule sets I might disable that would give me some
security without slowing the server down to a crawl. Could use some
practical advice.
On 5/29/07, Pedro LaWrench <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
In my main server, I allow all with
Order allow,deny
Allow all
Then in a virtual server (different port) I have
Order deny,allow
Allow from 10.1.2.3
Deny from all
Yet, it appears that all hosts can access /mydocs through the virtual serv
In my main server, I allow all with
Order allow,deny
Allow all
Then in a virtual server (different port) I have
Order deny,allow
Allow from 10.1.2.3
Deny from all
Yet, it appears that all hosts can access /mydocs through the virtual server.
Even with a deny for / in a virtual server config,
On 5/29/07, Sander Smeenk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello!
I'm a happy Apache 2.2.3 user, everything is working just fine, except
for this oddity which i'd like to see explained if possible ;-)
I recently hosted a large patch to a popular MMORPG on my blog, and as
expected, i got tons of hits
I got a wamp stack from a developer, and I have not been able to make vhosts
work. While recognizing it is entirely possible I did something wrong, I notice
that in this configuration he has changed the files the web is served content
from htdocs to something else, and further aliased that to
Thank you so much - It is now working as expected.
Thanks
Simon.
> -Original Message-
> From: Simon Billis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 29 May 2007 20:00
> To: users@httpd.apache.org
> Subject: RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Using Rewrite rules to force all requests to a
> specific page exce
Hello!
I'm a happy Apache 2.2.3 user, everything is working just fine, except
for this oddity which i'd like to see explained if possible ;-)
I recently hosted a large patch to a popular MMORPG on my blog, and as
expected, i got tons of hits on it. Curious as i am, i started
investigating what /
Hi Joshua,
Thank you :-)
I've been looking at this for a long time and failed to see the error.
Now to work on the logic...
Many thanks
Simon.
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Joshua Slive
> Sent: 29 May 2007 19:48
> To: users@httpd
On 5/29/07, Simon Billis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Folks,
Further to my last post I have followed the suggestion to log the rewrite
and I have found the following:
192.168.244.105 - - [29/May/2007:19:33:26 +0100]
[dev.mydomain.com/sid#89cf438][rid#8c496a8/initial] (4) RewriteCond:
input='19
Hi Folks,
Further to my last post I have followed the suggestion to log the rewrite
and I have found the following:
192.168.244.105 - - [29/May/2007:19:33:26 +0100]
[dev.mydomain.com/sid#89cf438][rid#8c496a8/initial] (4) RewriteCond:
input='192.168.244.247' pattern='^!192\.168\.244\.247$' => not-
Hi Joshua,
Thanks for the prompt response - the intention is to allow those ip's listed
to NOT be redirected, but all others to be redirected. What actually happens
is that no ip is redirected.
I'll configure the rewrite log as suggested to see what this throws up.
Thanks
Simon.
> -Origina
On 5/29/07, Simon Billis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Dear All,
I am attempting to force all requests to any url at www.mydomain.com to be
rewritten to http://www.mydomain.com/maintenance.php except for requests
made from specific IP addresses.
I thought that if I added the following that this wo
Dear All,
I am attempting to force all requests to any url at www.mydomain.com to be
rewritten to http://www.mydomain.com/maintenance.php except for requests
made from specific IP addresses.
I thought that if I added the following that this would work as intended:
RewriteEngine on
RewriteCond
> >
> > Is it possible to reject messages with attachments to this
> mailing list?
> > Some of us are still on lower bandwidth connections and
> apparently not
> > everyone uses their head before sending
> >
>
> uhm, gmail has a truncator.
>
Uhm, I'm downloading via POP3 - what does gm
On 5/29/07, Ryan Murray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Kind list maintainers-
Is it possible to reject messages with attachments to this mailing list?
Some of us are still on lower bandwidth connections and apparently not
everyone uses their head before sending
I feel your pain, but I think t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ryan Murray wrote:
> Kind list maintainers-
>
> Is it possible to reject messages with attachments to this mailing list?
> Some of us are still on lower bandwidth connections and apparently not
> everyone uses their head before sending
>
> Kirth
Kind list maintainers-
Is it possible to reject messages with attachments to this mailing list?
Some of us are still on lower bandwidth connections and apparently not
everyone uses their head before sending
Kirthi-
Given the utter thoughtlessness of your posts it's hard to immagine you
woul
I use a javascript generated by "ap_rputs" to manage a cokie session and to
redirect an XML document. When I try to view the page in Internet explorer
it doesn't work and I get an error: javascript code doesn't activate the
redirect and I get mixed page javascript/XML.
This is my javascript
htt
On 5/29/07, POLONKAI Gergely <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
If I recall well, yuo can use the option:
Deny all
No. Check the docs on . It can't be applied to TRACE.
> Currently we are using Apache 2.0.46. On the 1.3.x version we always
> used the following mod_rewrite rule to disable
On 5/29/07, Peter Gordon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I replaced the rules above with the following rules, which are meant to redirect
https->http.
It does not work. No redirect takes place and nothing is logged in the rewrite
log file. When I use an https:/ url
it continues as an https url.
Hi,
Thanks for sending the links, Sorry i forgot to metion the version. It is
apache 2.2 with ssl
My build was with this option ./configure --prefix=/usr/local/apache
--enable-ssl --enable-proxy --enable-proxy-connect --enable-proxy-ftp
--enable-proxy-http --enable-proxy-balancer
make
make inst
sorry for being a bit rude, but do you really have to post this in every
30 minutes? After googling a bit, I found that there are more then many
pages around the web, which discusses your problem, like
http://tldp.org/HOWTO/Apache-Compile-HOWTO/
and
http://www.delouw.ch/linux/apache.phtml
It's
Please help me to install https server. i am using linux and apache2.2.
Please help.
Thanks in advance.
kirthi
On 5/29/07, Kirthi Narayan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
HI
some how ssl is not working. just have look if i have done anything wrong.
My build was with this option ./configure --prefix=/usr/local/apache
--enable-ssl --enable-proxy --enable-proxy-connect --enable-proxy-ftp
--enable-proxy-http --
We never got this to work properly.We ended up moving to 2.0.55 and using the
traceenable feature:
http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.0/mod/core.html#traceenable
-Original Message-
From: Jeroen Vriezen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 29 May 2007 09:57
To: users@httpd.apache.org
Subject: [
Hi,
If I recall well, yuo can use the option:
Deny all
Rgds,
Gergely POLONKAI
Jeroen Vriezen írta:
> Hello,
>
> Currently we are using Apache 2.0.46. On the 1.3.x version we always
> used the following mod_rewrite rule to disable the TRACE option:
>
> RewriteEngine on
> RewriteCond %{REQ
Hello,
Currently we are using Apache 2.0.46. On the 1.3.x version we always used
the following mod_rewrite rule to disable the TRACE option:
RewriteEngine on
RewriteCond %{REQUEST_METHOD} ^TRACE
RewriteRule .* - [F]
When using these rules on Apache 2.0.46, TRACE is still possible. Beside the
fa
50 matches
Mail list logo
