Title:
Hello Groovy
Community,
At the time I discovered Groovy many years ago I remember that the
old logo captured my attention emotionally because, to me, it
reflected a new way of thinkin
> The logo immediately made me think about the Hippie Movement, free
thinking, a fresh look at the world, and no boundaries
Nice thoughts - I've always had a similar impression with the current logo,
though I always felt like it reminded me of a lightweight graffiti which
similarly implies free t
Thank you all for being so kind. Both your criticism and praise have been very helpful to me.The main things I personally think are missing after reading through responses:* Torx is a brand.* It's not groovy enough.* And the old shade of blue was groovier as well.With this in mind, (and th
Hi,
Ever so often i find myself wishing that Junit tests in Gradle would use the
GradleClassLoader instead of the default system classloader (e.g. to enable use
of dynamic (conditional), runtime dependencies without having to run those
tests in script blocks)
In Junit 5 it is possible to create
Thanks I'll test this version.
Today I am still using the V3 branch because the new parser was really too
slow in my context when I checked (something like 10s to compile a script
and I have several hundred so I have to disable it).
Le ven. 28 févr. 2025, 13:00, Paul King a écrit :
> Hi Jérémie
Hi Jérémie,
What Groovy/JDK/container versions are you using? If you are using
Groovy 4.0.x, the fixes in 4.0.26 may help.
There is an open OSGi issue with performance in the title, but I'll
likely close that and create a fresh issue in the next day or two to
better document the remaining gap.
R
I'd like to try it out to see how the old blue looks on the new design, then. It'd also be a lot less design work switching to a new logo that is the same color (since the website also has the same blue for its accent color.)Thanks :)-MWmid...@kakao.com Original email From : Søren Be
Hello,
I'm glad to learn that OSGi support in Groovy is being taken seriously 🙂
I myself use Groovy a lot in this context within my system.
A problem I often notice today is the compilation performance in this
environment. I've been investigating for quite some time, and so far, my
main suspect
[image: Screenshot 2025-02-28 at 9.15.52 pm.png]
In case the icns format isn't recognized.
On Fri, Feb 28, 2025 at 9:15 PM Paul King wrote:
> Hi Midna,
>
> Thanks for your design. I do like it. And yes, this mailing list is fine.
>
> We aren't necessarily unhappy with the current logo. We do get
Hi.
Long time Groovy user here, also new to the mailing list too. I don’t have an
opinion on whether there should/shouldn’t be a new logo, but just an
observation - I believe Torx is a registered trademark (see:
https://torxproducts.com/faq/), so it may be problematic using that name in any
li
I quite like it, but it is not me to decide.
On 28/02/2025 01:54, midnaw wrote:
Hello! I'm new to mailing lists in general, so please tell me if I'm putting
this in the wrong place
or otherwise misusing the list.
I've designed and would like to propose an alternate logo for Groovy. It's a
ve
11 matches
Mail list logo
