Re: Can someone point me to an example of using a ConsumerEventSource

created ? Is there a way to know this information without trying to send a message on the queue/topic associated with the producer ? Thank you very much for your answers Eric-AWL -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Can-someone-point-me-to-an-example-of-using-a-ConsumerEventSource

Listeners consumerEventSource small precisions ...

you very much for your answers Eric-AWL -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Listeners-consumerEventSource-small-precisions-...-tp23132900p23132900.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Listeners consumerEventSource small precisions ...

works... Eric-AWL. rajdavies wrote: > > Hi Eric-AWL > On 20 Apr 2009, at 10:01, Eric-AWL wrote: > >> >> Hi everybody >> >> I continue previous thread which describes how to use Advisory >> package and >> ConsumerEventSource.setConsumerListener. >

Queue/Topic name length and performance ?

my performance are worse than with selectors although I believed that selectors were not very performant. (From 22seconds to 25seconds). (It's possible my new ConsumerEventSource listeners are the real reason of the performance decrease) Has someone some precision to tell me about ? Thank y

Small network of broker hiccup just after starting in AMQ 5.3-snapshot

. And since I chose not to use persistence, some messages are lost. Does anyone has an idea ? Thank you Eric-AWL -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Small-network-of-broker-hiccup-just-after-starting-in-AMQ-5.3-snapshot-tp24016732p24016732.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User

broker dead block. Multicast Discovery Notifier thread doesn't stop

2 AMQ threads die very quickly, and my program leaves. Version : AMQ 5.3-snapshot I joined the trace of A internal embedded Broker and the thread dump at the end of A process. Eric-AWL http://www.nabble.com/file/p24034367/AMQ%2Bthread%2Bdump.txt AMQ+thread+dump.txt http://www.nabble.com/file

Do you know when ActiveMQ Session threads dies ?

Hi in 5.3-snapshot and 5.2 release, I think I correctly close consumers/producers/session and the threads like this one : ActiveMQ Session: ID:td0sib01s-32880-1245239727292-2:0:25 doesn't seem to die. Is there something to do ? Eric-AWL -- View this message in context:

Re: Do you know when ActiveMQ Session threads dies ?

error. Gary Tully wrote: > > I wonder are you experiencing > https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-2169 > > 2009/6/17 Eric-AWL > >> >> Hi >> >> in 5.3-snapshot and 5.2 release, I think I correctly close >> consumers/producers/session a

Re: Do you know when ActiveMQ Session threads dies ?

hat don't die are finally affected to the broken connection. I can see that "ActiveMQ Connection Worker" thread associated with my broken connection is always active. What is the best way to deal with this problem ? Thank you Eric-AWL Gary Tully wrote: > > session.clo

connection.close(), on a brokenConnection resolves my problem

ion. But it is not a big problem. I think it is not the way ActiveMQ should work. Eric-AWL Eric-AWL wrote: > > I think that I have some news. > > The problem is more complex than I wrote initially (I wanted to be clear). > > In fact, I have two ActiveMQ connections initiali

Re: connection.close(), on a brokenConnection resolves my problem

hreadPoolExecutor.java:603) at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:636) . :-( Eric-AWL wrote: > > NEW > > If I force a brokenConnection.close() into the onException callback, > (called when the "other" connection is broken), my process can now > termina

Re: connection.close(), on a brokenConnection resolves my problem

I think this session is associated to the network of broker topology between (multicast) my two "equivalent processes". I think I have several problems. However Close() seems to let the process in a cleaner situation. Here it is an other problem where "multicast" network of brokers are broken wh

Re: connection.close(), on a brokenConnection resolves my problem

"Multicast Discovery Agent Notifier" daemon prio=10 tid=0x0a82dc00 nid=0x6586 waiting on condition [0x43188000..0x43188b90] java.lang.Thread.State: WAITING (parking) at sun.misc.Unsafe.park(Native Method) - parking to wait for <0x2aaab3cf20a8> (a

LDAP Network Connector in AMQ 5.2. JMX InstanceAlreadyExists Exception

e same name "localhost" instead of the "iphost" value. As soon as 2 non established connection are tried. the second one finishes with a JMX InstanceAlreadyExists exception. Eric-AWL -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/LDAP-Network-Connector-in-AMQ-5.2.-JMX-Ins

2 small questions on wildcards usage.

consume or produce on "*.queue" ? Thank you for your answers Eric-AWL -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/2-small-questions-on-wildcards-usage.-tp24752155p24752155.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Dynamically change the network connectors caracteristics in embedded brokers

Is it possible ? Eric-AWL -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Dynamically-change-the-network-connectors-caracteristics-in-embedded-brokers-tp24752234p24752234.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: 2 small questions on wildcards usage.

Thank you for your very quick answer ! Eric-AWL rajdavies wrote: > > > On 31 Jul 2009, at 08:14, Eric-AWL wrote: > >> >> Hi >> >> Are wildcards limited to a consumer usage, or can they be used by >> producers >> ? >> >> I ex

Re: Dynamically change the network connectors caracteristics in embedded brokers

Thank you for your very quick answer ! Eric-AWL rajdavies wrote: > > > On 31 Jul 2009, at 08:21, Eric-AWL wrote: > >> >> Hi >> >> Is it possible and allowed (it's important for us to respect >> evolutivity) to >> dynamically chang

2 small questions on wildcards usage (MORE)

the beginning of the destination name, or is it always at the end ? Eric-AWL -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/2-small-questions-on-wildcards-usage.-tp24752155p24752803.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Full Duplex Network of brokers and number of connections questions.

; group and creates a full duplex networkConnector with "multicast2" group value. My question is : between broker A, and broker B, how many tcp connections will be created ? 2, 3, or 4 ? Eric-AWL -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Full-Duplex-Network-of-brokers-and-number-of-connections-questions.-tp24758942p24758942.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Duplex Network Connector and Firewalls

mote broker the TCP connection to use to send its answers back ? Regards Eric-AWL -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Duplex-Network-Connector-and-Firewalls-tp24840835p24840835.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Duplex Network Connector and Firewalls

nfigure through the firewall. Thank you for your quick answer. Eric-AWL rajdavies wrote: > > > > When duplex is enabled - the single connection is used by the local > and remote broker. So to get through firewalls - only the brokers > outside the firewall should create

Advisory Topics, ConsumerEvent Classes and Wildcards usage

uot;A.B" and "*.B" consumers) ? If not, how can I proceed to know the good number of consumers that can deal with the messages posted by my "A.B" producers ? Thank you for your help. Eric-AWL -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Advisory-Topics%2C-ConsumerE

Where can I find wildcards usage examples ?

Hi I want to use and test wildcards. I come from a JAVA/JMS native usage, and would like to change the lowest number of things in my programs. Does someone know where I can find some JAVA examples which show how to use wildcards ? Thank you Eric-AWL -- View this message in context: http

ConsumerEventSource and wildcards. Different behaviours between Topics and Queues

nt is good for topics, but is always 0 for queues. All is right if I don't use wildcards at all in my ConsumerEventSource and Consumers. Someone knows this problem (ActiveMQ 5.2) ? Eric-AWL -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/ConsumerEventSource-and-wildcards.-Different-behaviou

2 duplex network connections between 2 brokers.

error. I don't find clearly the answer by looking for this in the forum. Thank you in advance. Eric-AWL -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/2-duplex-network-connections-between-2-brokers.-tp26270876p26270876.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archi

2 connections and InterruptedException

gQueue.put(LinkedBlockingQueue.java:240) at org.apache.activemq.transport.vm.VMTransport.oneway(VMTransport.java:92) ... 22 more I'm not sure that the "interrupt" is not done by on of my process. But I don't interrupt any ActiveMQ thread myself. Do you know if this behaviour is the

What happens where a consumer is not present ?

ueueBrowser and TopicBrowser usage can be a solution for delete old not consumed messages ? And I wonder if they are considered as consumers as far as Advisory Messages are concerned ? Eric-AWL -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/What-happens-where-a-consumer-is-not-present---tp2646416

JMX MBeans Attributes documentation

Hi Where can we find documents explaining all JMX MBean attributes ? Eric-AWL -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/JMX-MBeans-Attributes-documentation-tp26465124p26465124.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: What happens where a consumer is not present ?

. Eric-AWL gregory.guibert wrote: > > Hello Eric, > > I have a similar problem with ActiveMQ 5.2. > > http://old.nabble.com/Producers-blocking-td26448458.html > > What i did when I encountered the same "global freeze" was to disable the > producer fl

Re: JMX MBeans Attributes documentation

Hi Bruce It would be good to have a full documentation. But my today problem would be to be able to detect a "global pause" due to a producer flow control behaviour. It would be nicer if I could understand all the attribute values of the Queue or Topic MBeans ... Eric-AWL bsn

Automatic delete of expired messages

r a topic. Can someone explain me the "official" way to do this, and the ActiveMQ configuration to define ? Is the number of consumers for a destination (that can be found by analyzing Adivisory Messages) increased when this trick is used ? Thank you in advance Eric-AWL -- View this

Re: Automatic delete of expired messages

Hi Joe. Thank you very much for your answer. Eric-AWL. Joe Fernandez wrote: > > With AMQ 5.3, non-persistent messages that expire are automatically > removed/deleted from their destination. Persistent messages are moved to > the DLQ. > > By default, the destination swe

Re: Automatic delete of expired messages

us to know the exact number of accessible consumers. Eric-AWL Joe Fernandez wrote: > > You might also want to look into the DiscardingDLQBroker plugin. > > See bottom of this page > > http://activemq.apache.org/message-redelivery-and-dlq-handling.html > > Joe > htt

ActiveMQ brokers version upgrade rules

mmers follow a rule about this general upgrade problem ? If yes, what is this rule ? Thank you in advance Eric-AWL -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-brokers-version-upgrade-rules-tp26861693p26861693.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Connection handling + TCP CLOSE_WAIT on Linux + Solaris

Hi ! I'm interesting by this problem. - Have you 1000 CLOSE_WAIT or less ? - Do you know if these CLOSE_WAIT disappear after a while ? - Do you know if these CLOSE_WAIT happen if messages are consumed ? Eric-AWL a...@frogl wrote: > > This simple example will show connections accu

"Client already connected" in a network of broker and a direct connection

n a duplex network of broker configuration. (Is the clientId is the same for process A, and for the embedded broker of process A ?) Thank you for your answer. Eric-AWL -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/%22Client-already-connected%22-in-a-network-of-broker-and-a-direct-

Re: Network of brokers - already connected

Hi Joe. But networkConnector names are different "S1" and "S2". Even if the problem is resolved, in some cases, it could be interesting to have more than one duplex connections between two brokers (jsut for splitting flows for example). Eric-AWL. Joe Fernandez wrote: &

Too much "subscription MBeans" => OOM.

quot;Subscription" MBeans. Can someone explain me what is exactly a "subscription MBean". Is it associated to a session, to a consumer, to a client part of an exchange ??? Thank you in advance. Eric-AWL -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/Too-much-%22subscription-M

Re: Too much "subscription MBeans" => OOM.

Hi Rob Thank you very much. We work with a 5.2 version. I have to verify that it isn't our own development that create far too much MessageConsumers. Eric-AWL rajdavies wrote: > > A subscription is the broker side representation of a MessageConsumer > - which version - and

Re: Too much "subscription MBeans" => OOM.

velopers : 2341 ObjectNames (I think it's OK when I count my consumers, queues, topics, advisory queues ...) 146 MBeanServerNotifications On components developed by the second group of developers : 72049 Object Names. 127956 MBeanServerNotification I think the most of ObjectNames are the subscripti

Multicast discovery doesn't seem to work currently.

Hi I'm currently in a situation where I have a (multicast discovery) network of brokers of some brokers (15). One component "A" has a network connector (duplex) to the 14 others which have an associated transport connector. The 14 others components discovered and connected themselves on the same

Easy question : SSL and network of brokers ?

Hi In activeMQ 5.2 / 5.3, is SSL supported on multicast discovered TCP networks of brokers ? (I want to crypt my messages exchanges and protect my connections from outside non authorized usage) Thank you in advance Eric-AWL -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/Easy

Re: Easy question : SSL and network of brokers ?

Ok Thank you very much. Eric-AWL Gary Tully wrote: > > Yes it is, the discovery provider sets up the ssl context (using whatever > is > configured on the broker) before attempting to connect to a remote broker. > > On 23 March 2010 17:13, Eric-AWL wrote: > >>

Re: Prefetch Limit of 1000 .... without acknowledges

y queues, and use JMScorrelationId and selectors in each client threads. James.Strachan wrote: > > which version of ActiveMQ? > > On 30/01/2008, Eric-AWL <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> Hi >> >> Context >> >> A

Re: Prefetch Limit of 1000 .... without acknowledges

Hi ! I just finished a test with one fixed queue for the answer from the server, instead of using temporary queues. On the client, for every message the client want to send, I associate a JMSCorrelationID, and I create one consumer on this fixed queue with a selector on this CorrelationID. The s

Re: "Embedded broker", "network of brokers" and "temporary queues"

You were right ttmdev. In a half-duplex configuration, it works ! Like you tell it to me, I had to add "sleep" temporisation after connection start, and before some releases of resources. Thank you very very much Eric-AWL ttmdev wrote: > > Any chance you can post the sour

Re: Prefetch Limit of 1000 .... without acknowledges

ttmdev said me that this "duplex" problem is the same as AMQ-1521 and is resolved in 5.1.1 . I will try it. Thank you. Eric-AWL -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Prefetch-Limit-of-1000--without-acknowledges-tp15180095s2354p15223382.html Sent from the Activ

Re: Prefetch Limit of 1000 .... without acknowledges

Hi James ttmdev help me to resolve the problem with two half-duplex connections. it was a problem of synchronization. Resources were freed to quickly. For the problem of duplex, ttmdev said me that this problem was fixed in 5.1 and was the same as problem AMQ-1521. Eric-AWL -- View this

Re: Prefetch Limit of 1000 .... without acknowledges

Hi ! ttmdev helps me to resolve the problem with two half-duplex connections. it was a problem of synchronization. Resources were freed to quickly. For the problem of duplex, ttmdev said me that this problem was fixed in 5.1 and was the same as problem AMQ-1521. Eric-AWL -- View this message

Large networks of brokers, dynamically included destinations and temporary queues

network connectors or two different connectors ? I can use ActiveMQ 5.1 if it is better. Thank in advance Eric-AWL -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Large-networks-of-brokers%2C-dynamically-included-destinations-and-temporary-queues-tp19070151p19070151.html Sent from the Act

How to develop his own DiscoveryAgent ?

Hi every body I won't be in a local area network topology and would want to develop my own discoveryAgent. Is someone can help me by telling me where I can find some sorts of documentations ? (rules to follow, and so on ?) Thank you ... Eric-AWL -- View this message in context:

Re: Large networks of brokers, dynamically included destinations and temporary queues

because I have to be sure that one answer queue name is not used by other servers which have the same role. Using Temporary queues with only name over complete architecture seem to be a better solution. Eric-AWL Hi Eric, As long as there exists the appropriate forwarding bridge(s), w/correct

Re: How to develop his own DiscoveryAgent ?

multicast request on their own islet. Directory servers have a fixed IP address and are known by brokers. You can look at my other request "Large networks of brokers, dynamically included destinations and temporary queues" to better see what I mean. Eric-AWL James.Strachan wrote: > &g

LDAP Discovery mechanism & round robin choice

reference doesn't work ? Does the discovery mechanism choose an other ? What happens exactly when we add or remove one reference in the LDAP directory structure ? Eric-AWL -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/LDAP-Discovery-mechanism---round-robin-choice-tp19090881p19090881

Re: LDAP Discovery mechanism & round robin choice

han one LDAP entries which can all be considered as a network broker. Which server will be chosen and how ? Eric-AWL James.Strachan wrote: > > 2008/8/21 Eric-AWL <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> >> Hi every body >> >> I'm not an LDAP expert so I expect I don

Re: LDAP Discovery mechanism & round robin choice

to make a multicast choice (associated to a group) for him, and send it the answer. And I would like that this discovery process can be repeated automatically when the network connection with the distant broker is down. Do you advise me not to try to write my own Directory Agent ? Eric-AWL Joe Fer

NamingContext error in 5.2.0

Hi On 5.2.0 release. I create 10 threads, each using the same dynamicQueues/CATE-CHARGE-charge queue I fail with javax.naming.NamingException: Something already bound at CATE-CHARGE-Charge at org.apache.activemq.jndi.ReadOnlyContext.internalBind(ReadOnlyContext.java:150) at org

Re: NamingContext error in 5.2.0

ed > to look it up in each thread many times concurrently? > > 2009/1/30 Eric-AWL : >> >> Hi >> >> On 5.2.0 release. >> >> I create 10 threads, each using the same dynamicQueues/CATE-CHARGE-charge >> queue >> >> I fail with >>

What can be the reason ?

Hi everybody In 4.1.2. I developped a queuing and multi-threaded mechanism just behind JMS listener : each time a message comes, a thread is prepared, enqueued (Executor) and executed only when an other one dies. I can manage the maximum number of active threads. When I used AUTO_ACKNOWLEDGE Se

Re: What can be the reason ?

I just see that it's strange that the first error just has messageCount=500 in the first case, and just 1500 in the second ! Eric-AWL Eric-AWL wrote: > > Hi everybody > > In 4.1.2. > > I developped a queuing and multi-threaded mechanism just behind JMS > list

Correctly leaving a network of broker

Hi I have two Java processes with their own embedded broker, linked together with a multicast network of broker. I start the "server process" which first creates its broker and connects itself to it. Then, I start the "client process" which first creates its broker, and connects itself to it.

Re: Correctly leaving a network of broker

I use xbean reference to an activemq.xml file to read a VM configuration on each side. "vm://instance?brokerConfig=xbean:activemq.xml&waitForStart=2" I like this method because I can switch from internal VM broker to TCP external broker very easily and just use JMS to connect to my internal or e

Re: Correctly leaving a network of broker

=false to the uri > so that you don't end up with two embedded brokers. > > hope this helps, > Gary. > > 2009/2/18 Eric-AWL : >> >> I use xbean reference to an activemq.xml file to read a VM configuration >> on >> each side. >> >> "

Re: Correctly leaving a network of broker

Ouch. I just looked at "borkerFactory" class. (I tried not to use ActiveMQ internals ... And never looked at it) No problem Gary. I understood your advice. The last question is not appropriate. Forget it please. Eric Eric-AWL wrote: > > Hi Gary > > Yes, it helps

Re: Correctly leaving a network of broker

OK It works !!! When I disconnect from my embedded connection, I stop my embedded broker and the process exits gracefully. I just had to add 4 ActiveMQ specific lines in my JMS compliant Connection Class. It would be better if it was an external parameter of the URI but it is a good workaround.

What are the reasons why synchronous receive() doesn't work ?

Hi ! I'm new with ActiveMQ. I try to make a simple Question/Answer mechanism on only one server, one ActiveMQ instance, and two client processes. First process 1 client which sends one message on a first queue, and waits with a "second_queue_consumer.receive()" on a second queue 1 connection, 2

Re: What are the reasons why synchronous receive() doesn't work ?

Yes and all my "send" work perfectly. My ActiveMQ version is 4.1.0. rajdavies wrote: > > Have you called start on your connections ? > > On Jan 14, 2008, at 11:02 AM, Eric-AWL wrote: > >> >> Hi ! >> >> I'm new with ActiveMQ. I try to m

Re: What are the reasons why synchronous receive() doesn't work ?

wasn't received by it. Well, It seems that I have to practice !!! Thank you for your help !! Eric rajdavies wrote: > > does it work with activemq 5.0 ? > > On Jan 14, 2008, at 11:10 AM, Eric-AWL wrote: > >> >> Yes and all my "send

"Embedded broker", "network of brokers" and "temporary queues"

#x27;t exist. I use ActiveMQ 4.1 Anyone has an idea ? Thank you Eric-AWL. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/%22Embedded-broker%22%2C-%22network-of-brokers%22-and-%22temporary-queues%22-tp15023996s2354p15023996.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: "Embedded broker", "network of brokers" and "temporary queues"

The hostname of the first server (client process) is ytsvmx01s, the second one (server process) is ytsvmx02s here is an extract of my "vm connection" javax.jms.Connection connection; BrokerService broker; . // create a new intial context, which loads from jndi.pr

Re: "Embedded broker", "network of brokers" and "temporary queues"

It's because I don't know ActiveMQ very well :-) . I will try your configuration which seems far easier. I think I find the reason why my programs hangs. On my process client, I create the temporary queue and just behind, I send a message with the JMSSetReply set to this temporary queue. I think

Re: "Embedded broker", "network of brokers" and "temporary queues"

I continued my tests. now a lot of exchanges are good, the client process (embedded VM) initializes 100 threads. each creates one temporary queue, sends a message on a fixed queue referencing the temporary queue for the answer and wait for the answer on the temporary queue. a loop of 10 such ques

Re: "Embedded broker", "network of brokers" and "temporary queues"

Sometimes the queue seems to be deleted on the embedded server process. Is it a known bug ? Eric-AWL -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/%22Embedded-broker%22%2C-%22network-of-brokers%22-and-%22temporary-queues%22-tp15023996s2354p15140171.html Sent from the ActiveMQ

Re: "Embedded broker", "network of brokers" and "temporary queues"

I'm french, so excuse me for my poor English. I have two servers - ytsvmx01s - ytsvmx02s Linux 2.6.21 i386 The two servers are connected to the same switch ActiveMQ 5.0.0 is installed on the two servers in /usr/local/activemq/release with root user On the two servers, I have a

5.0.0 WebConsole And temporary queues

ueues. Is there a way to manager temporary queues with the new WebConsole ? Eric-AWL -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/5.0.0-WebConsole-And-temporary-queues-tp15160235s2354p15160235.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: "Embedded broker", "network of brokers" and "temporary queues"

71-2:1:2:1001:1 I try to acknowledge messages. I tried to increase prefetch limit ... Excuse-me if all these different tests confuse you. The other message is with "half-duplex" configuration, and things are not the same with this "full-duplex" configuration Eric-AWL -- View th

Prefetch Limit of 1000 .... without acknowledges

here isn't any message "ID:ytsvmx02s-52597-1201689535145-2:1:2:1001:1" after this one and you will see that there is DEBUG PrefetchSubscription - Prefetch limit. just after in the logfile. Eric-AWL -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Prefetch-Limit-of

MultiCast Discovery and refusal of connection

your answer Eric-AWL -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/MultiCast-Discovery-and-refusal-of-connection-tp28827529p28827529.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: MultiCast Discovery and refusal of connection

different sub-networks). Perhaps the problem is here Thank you for your answer. Eric-AWL Joe Fernandez wrote: > > What does the transport connector for your 'distant' broker look like? > Reason I ask is that the wildcard (0.0.0.0) vs localhost IP address issue

Re: MultiCast Discovery and refusal of connection

establish a connection with it (no new "Establishing ..." line appears) It seems to be the same in fuse 5.3.0.6 version. Eric-AWL -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/MultiCast-Discovery-and-refusal-of-connection-tp28827529p28856873.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

CountDownLatch problem . MultiCast Discovery and refusal of connection on DUPLEX connection (Fuse 5.3.0.5) .

us bridge to SIBBusModule-NOCP5-tpnocp08s-bus stopped Eric-AWL -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/MultiCast-Discovery-and-refusal-of-connection-tp28827529p29083434.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

CountDownLatch problem . MultiCast Discovery and refusal of connection on DUPLEX connection (Fuse 5.3.0.5) .

rt class ? Eric-AWL Eric-AWL wrote: > > Hi > > I'm sure that I identified a Latch problem in Multicast Network Discovery > mechanism on Duplex connection > > The multicast notifier thread is blocked. here the trace > > "Notifier-MulticastDiscoveryAgent-liste

Re: CountDownLatch problem . MultiCast Discovery and refusal of connection on DUPLEX connection (Fuse 5.3.0.5) .

veMQ complex configuration, it happens when network is faulty (that happens not very often), and I don't know ActiveMQ source code very well Who could help me to identify potential effects of this change, before I try to modify it ? (I can't do that on my production system wit

Re: CountDownLatch problem . MultiCast Discovery and refusal of connection on DUPLEX connection (Fuse 5.3.0.5) .

trace(configuration.getBrokerName() + " starting local Bridge, localBroker=" + localBroker); } remoteBrokerNameKnownLatch.await(); ... } - 960 CLOSE_WAIT - a file descriptor limit Will the transport.closeAsync=false flag be helpful here ? Eric-AWL Gary Tully wro

5.3.2 source tests : AMQ2149Test is blocked during broker stop.

nection - The connection to '/127.0.0.1:41781' is taking a long time to shutdown. Eric-AWL -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/5.3.2-source-tests-%3A-AMQ2149Test-is-blocked-during-broker-stop.-tp29114882p29114882.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: 5.3.2 source tests : AMQ2149Test is blocked during broker stop.

1' is taking a long time to shutdown. 2010-07-09 09:44:50,007 [Timer-0] INFO TransportConnection - The connection to '/127.0.0.1:41781' is taking a long time to shutdown. Eric-AWL Eric-AWL wrote: > > Hi > > I try to compile and test ActiveMQ

Re: 5.3.2 source tests : AMQ2149Test is blocked during broker stop.

I experienced a "File system full" on the current file system during the test. I don't know if that can have an impact on it But .... Eric-AWL Eric-AWL wrote: > > Hi > > I try to compile and test ActiveMQ 5.3.2 source using Maven. Nothing more. > > The

Re: 5.3.2 source tests : AMQ2149Test is blocked during broker stop.

999, size= 1 Eric-AWL Gary Tully wrote: > > That particular test is under investigation on trunk at the moment as > it seems to fail reproducible now rather than intermittently. > It may makes sense for you to add a local exclude the the surefire > target in the activemq-core pom.x

Re: 5.3.2 source tests : AMQ2149Test is blocked during broker stop.

DemandForwardingBridgeSupport class and my first tests seem to fail on some broker.stop() conditions (example network/NetworkReconnectTest.java). Eric-AWL Eric-AWL wrote: > > I have another error with > > Running org.apache.activemq.usecases.ExpiredMessagesWithNoConsumerTest > Tests r

5.3.2 : DemandForwardingBridge and Failover interaction ?

patch paused, waiting for outstanding dispatch interruption processing (1) to complete.. Eric-AWL -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/5.3.2-%3A-DemandForwardingBridge-and-Failover-interaction---tp29147602p29147602.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archi

Re: 5.3.2 : DemandForwardingBridge and Failover interaction ?

- dispatch paused, waiting for outstanding dispatch interruption processing (1) to complete.. It's the way messageConsumers (and corresponding sessions) are cleared that impacts the "transportInterruptionProcessingComplete" countdown latch value Eric-AWL -- View this message in

AMQ2693 : 5.3.2 : DemandForwardingBridge and Failover interaction ?

In fact it's the AMQ2693 bug Eric-AWL -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/5.3.2-%3A-DemandForwardingBridge-and-Failover-interaction---tp29147602p29147952.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Duplex and network fault.

minutes + y seconds - the transport inactivity thread closes the old transport connection (y seconds >> x milliseconds) All seems Ok, but no message are exchanged with this bridge. Eric-AWL -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/Duplex-and-network-fault.-tp29205793p2

Re: Duplex and network fault.

- SIBBusSupervisor-td0sib01s bridge to SIBBusModule-TestDeCharge-td0sib01v stopped It seems that bridge on Link 1 is finally broken ??? Eric-AWL Eric-AWL wrote: > > Hi > > In the case where network is alternatively on/off in a duplex multicast > configuration, I first

Re: Duplex and network fault.

"transport side" sees temporarily (while InactivityMonitor doesn't destroy the first bridge) 2 brokers instead of one, and can send back some messages by using the faulty connection. Is this true ? Thank you in advance Eric-AWL Eric-AWL wrote: > > SIBBusModule-TestDeCharge-

Re: Duplex and network fault.

Ok, I will try to add some code lines to avoid this case Not easy at first view. Eric-AWL rajdavies wrote: > > Hi Eric, > > yes I think this is the case - I think we need to ensure that the old > connection is destroyed when the new one joins > > cheers, >

Re: Duplex and network fault.

try to send it back) if the connection is always active ? Is it Ok ? On the Transport Side, the new bridge won't be created while the InactivityMonitor doesn't destroy the old bridge. Eric-AWL Eric-AWL wrote: > > Ok, I will try to add some code lines to avoid this case

Re: Duplex and network fault.

cific functions (failover connections for example) are managed. Thank you Eric-AWL rajdavies wrote: > > wouldn't you want to do it the other way round - destroy the current > connection and use the new one ? > > On 21 Jul 2010, at 17:27, Eric-AWL wrote: > >> &

Re: Duplex and network fault.

I added a fix in the Jira AMQ-2774 thread. Eric-AWL Eric-AWL wrote: > > yes, it seems to be better and, finally easier to manage. I will try. > > Do you confirm me that, in a normal situation, the transport connection > should always be deleted from the current list before a

  1   2   >