Hi every body I want to create a large configuration with dozens of servers. I would want to distinguish groups of servers by role and assign them static queue names prefix. To avoid large number of hops, I imagine creating several different network of brokers connections which will be associated by multicast groups (with a good dynamicallyIncludedDestinations configuration)
http://www.nabble.com/file/p19070151/Nabble.jpeg I explain : when I am connected on a broker of group "A*" and want to produce a message for Queue "B*", I send it to my broker which knows that all messages for Queues B* must be dispatch to a group of brokers which manage B* consumers. And so on for groups C, D, E, F .... (a sort of full web topology) each group has a dedicated network of brokers for each prefix of static queues. Some of my messages must have an answer, and I imagine using temporary queues, consumer on them and JMSReply for answer. With this configuration, is there a risk that the answer which must be sent to the temporary queue, doesn't use a direct connection and follow a long way to find the requestor ? In such configuration, is it better to use duplex network connectors or two different connectors ? I can use ActiveMQ 5.1 if it is better. Thank in advance Eric-AWL -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Large-networks-of-brokers%2C-dynamically-included-destinations-and-temporary-queues-tp19070151p19070151.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
