I have an asynchronous sender and receiver. After sending about 200k
messages I am getting 'OutOfMemory'
are you closing all connection after you send from producer?
rby wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Same here, I have an obvious memory leak with activemq 5.1-snapshot.
> I hope someone will respond at l
Did somebody see this Warning exception while using active MQ 5 when sending
asynchronous messages?
this is exception i am getting on producer class after some time of its
running.
the url for broker is :
tcp://localhost:61616?trace=true&wireFormat.maxInactivityDuration=-1
10:44:44,427 WARN Ac
Hi Mike,
Thanks for your time. I am a bit confused here. The config that you have
sent me seeems to be of a broker network rather than a Master/Slave
topology. Shouldn't we be setting the shared datastore like this:
Is /data in your config the shared directory?
Thanks,
Ramit
Mik
Dear All:
After checking out all API all day, I still has no idea how to get user name
and password of JDBC connection in config file.
Do I need to user ConnectionContext or ConnectionInfo classes??
How could I get these info from BrokerService???
Please help me to figure it out~
Sincerely,
J
Hi,
Replying to my own message, the problem may be due to the following whenever
I start a broker (or if a slave becomes a master):
INFO AMQPersistenceAdapter - Aquired lock for AMQ
Store/shared/activemq
INFO AMQPersistenceAdapter - AMQStore starting using directory:
/shared/a
Hi,
We are having two boxes, with 4 brokers each, which are responsible for one
queue. Failover works most of the time, but sometimes after a broker shuts
down, the one, which is waiting for the lock throws following exception:
java.io.IOException: Failed to start database 'derbydb', see the nex
Sorry, i can't really help with answering your question, but i though I would
also show my interest in this topic..
basically I too am confused as to why messages only get DLQ'd when there
active consumers even when the time to live on the message is vasly
exceeded,
thiamteck wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
Ok, I got the problem. The problem was at my sender/receiver components in
Mule. Yeah, I was using Mule as a client to connect to ActiveMQ. For more
information about this problem with mule go to :
http://www.nabble.com/forum/ViewPost.jtp?post=13619403&framed=y
http://www.nabble.com/forum/ViewPos
I am trying to get a very simple app running using the AMQ AjaxServlet, and
I can not seem to get it working. I am running the following:
- Java 1.5.0_14
- AMQ v5.0
- Jetty 6.1.8
Some details about my app:
- I have a stand along Spring container running my AMQ message broker
listening on tcp://l
Has anything become of this? I'm using ActiveMQ 5 now, if that matters.
agabel wrote:
>
> I use Jboss 4.0.5 and activeMQ 4.1.
>
> I want to define a XAConnectionFactory. I doesnt find any documentation
> about this point.
> If I define in the ra.xml following:
>
>
Yes, the /data is my shared directory. Persistence can be set up either way
according to the config examples I have seen.
I used the network of brokers to keep the slaves up to date when I was
originally having problems with the behavior of the slaves. I am not sure
if having this configured is
Hi Mike,
Thanks for the reply. I think I understand the way you have set it up now,
but doesn't the slave just sit waiting for the lock to be released? As its
connectors are not yet started, the store & forward network can't be
established. My master keeps complaining that it can't connect to the
I moved this morning to ActiveMQ 5.0.0 and encountered problems with the
dependency on org.apache.activemq:activeio-core:jar:3.1-SNAPSHOT. This
led me to the following thread:
http://www.mail-archive.com/users@activemq.apache.org/msg04738.html
Using the exclusion fixed my problem. But I what I
I apologize for asking basic questions! I am trying to configure multicast
discovery among brokers on an insecure network. Is this possible or a good
idea?
I don't know much about multicast, so I don't understand how to restrict
which systems get connected.
Thanks,
A.
--
View this message in
I am trying to get a very simple app running using the AMQ AjaxServlet, and
I can not seem to get it working. I am running the following:
- Java 1.5.0_14
- AMQ v5.0
- Jetty 6.1.8
Some details about my app:
- I have a stand along Spring container running my AMQ message broker
listening on tcp://l
I just checked our logs, and I am seeing the same message about the Master
not being able to connect to the slave. I will be removing the Network of
Brokers setting form our config. We are using queues, not topics.
Thanks for pointing out the Network of Brokers issue! I forgot to check the
logs
Yeah, I guess doing it the way the website recommends is the correct method
to configure Master/Slave.
Thanks,
Ramit
Mike Miljour wrote:
>
> I just checked our logs, and I am seeing the same message about the Master
> not being able to connect to the slave. I will be removing the Network of
>
Can you provide information re the memory leak that you've come across?
rby wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Same here, I have an obvious memory leak with activemq 5.1-snapshot.
> I hope someone will respond at least to one of these memory related
> questions.
>
> Regards,
> Ramzi
>
>
> krv wrote:
>>
>
After looking at the documentation more closely I think I've answered my own
question, and that this behavior is by design.
"To read the field value, readBytes should be successively called until it
returns a value less than the length of the read buffer. The value of the
bytes in the buffer foll
Hi,
I am trying to understand ActiveMQ's security feature.
I started with simple authentication but seem to be missing something. I
have search the forum as well as Google but no luck.
My test starts the embedded broker and makes a connection. Based on the
users defined, I expect the request t
In my test setup i have 3 servers which are using multicast discovery to find
connections for a network of brokers. Each broker has client listener for
topic A. If one of the brokers publishes to the topic, all of them should
get it. Would that be possible with the networkTTL value of 1 or do I ne
My college just told me that the message only enter DLQ after consumer
reconnect, if the consumer is same server as the ActiveMQ. Anyway, I not yet
test it out myself.
PM wrote:
>
> Sorry, i can't really help with answering your question, but i though I
> would also show my interest in this top
22 matches
Mail list logo