My college just told me that the message only enter DLQ after consumer reconnect, if the consumer is same server as the ActiveMQ. Anyway, I not yet test it out myself.
PM wrote: > > Sorry, i can't really help with answering your question, but i though I > would also show my interest in this topic.. > > basically I too am confused as to why messages only get DLQ'd when there > active consumers even when the time to live on the message is vasly > exceeded, > > > thiamteck wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> I am using ActiveMQ 5.0 on Windows XP and Windows 2003. >> >> My program send a persistent message to queue with timeToLive = 3 >> seconds. The message enter into ActiveMQ.DLQ after timeout. >> >> Then I have start a consumer to the queue with connection URI below, >> where "jms.redeliveryPolicy.maximumRedeliveries=-1" means unlimited >> redelivery according to documnetation: >> tcp://127.0.0.1:61616?wireFormat.maxInactivityDuration=0&jms.redeliveryPolicy.maximumRedeliveries=-1 >> >> >> Then I stop the consumer, and send another persistent message with >> timeToLive = 3 seconds. This time the message do not enter ActiveMQ.DLQ >> after timeout. >> >> After a while, I start my consumer again and expect the consumer able to >> receive the message. But once the consumer connected to ActiveMQ, then >> pending message was enter into ActiveMQ.DLQ. >> >> So below is my questions: >> 1) It is my assumption invalid and this is this the expected behavior of >> ActiveMQ? or this is some sort of bugs in ActiveMQ? >> 2) Anyway to tweak the producer/consumer/queue so that consumer can >> receive the message even it already exceed the timeout and redelivery? >> >> Thank you. >> >> Truly, >> Thiam Teck >> > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Message-enter-ActiveMQ.DLQ-after-consumer-reconnect-tp16306220s2354p16346636.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
