lacing the match prefix from "name#" to "name*"
> > >
> > > On Wed, Jun 4, 2025 at 6:59 PM Justin Bertram
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Can you be more specific about where exactly you're looking? If
> > possible,
> > >
king? If
> possible,
> > > steps to reproduce the behavior you're observing would be ideal.
> > >
> > >
> > > Justin
> > >
> > > On Wed, Jun 4, 2025 at 4:18 AM Franck Malka
> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi, All
> > > >
xactly you're looking? If possible,
> > steps to reproduce the behavior you're observing would be ideal.
> >
> >
> > Justin
> >
> > On Wed, Jun 4, 2025 at 4:18 AM Franck Malka wrote:
> >
> > > Hi, All
> > >
> > > In
ideal.
>
>
> Justin
>
> On Wed, Jun 4, 2025 at 4:18 AM Franck Malka wrote:
>
> > Hi, All
> >
> > In my broker.xml I configured different address-settings for different
> > address name matches.
> > mainly altering max-size-bytes and paging-max-size by
different
> address name matches.
> mainly altering max-size-bytes and paging-max-size bytes parameters.
> I do observe significant improvement in performance with the new settings.
>
> What I don't understand is that on the JMX console in the GUI, I don't see
> my new addr
Hi, All
In my broker.xml I configured different address-settings for different
address name matches.
mainly altering max-size-bytes and paging-max-size bytes parameters.
I do observe significant improvement in performance with the new settings.
What I don't understand is that on the JMX co