Re: max-size-bytes and paging-max-size bytes

2025-06-04 Thread Justin Bertram
lacing the match prefix from "name#" to "name*" > > > > > > On Wed, Jun 4, 2025 at 6:59 PM Justin Bertram > > wrote: > > > > > > > Can you be more specific about where exactly you're looking? If > > possible, > > >

Re: max-size-bytes and paging-max-size bytes

2025-06-04 Thread Franck Malka
king? If > possible, > > > steps to reproduce the behavior you're observing would be ideal. > > > > > > > > > Justin > > > > > > On Wed, Jun 4, 2025 at 4:18 AM Franck Malka > wrote: > > > > > > > Hi, All > > > >

Re: max-size-bytes and paging-max-size bytes

2025-06-04 Thread Justin Bertram
xactly you're looking? If possible, > > steps to reproduce the behavior you're observing would be ideal. > > > > > > Justin > > > > On Wed, Jun 4, 2025 at 4:18 AM Franck Malka wrote: > > > > > Hi, All > > > > > > In

Re: max-size-bytes and paging-max-size bytes

2025-06-04 Thread Franck Malka
ideal. > > > Justin > > On Wed, Jun 4, 2025 at 4:18 AM Franck Malka wrote: > > > Hi, All > > > > In my broker.xml I configured different address-settings for different > > address name matches. > > mainly altering max-size-bytes and paging-max-size by

Re: max-size-bytes and paging-max-size bytes

2025-06-04 Thread Justin Bertram
different > address name matches. > mainly altering max-size-bytes and paging-max-size bytes parameters. > I do observe significant improvement in performance with the new settings. > > What I don't understand is that on the JMX console in the GUI, I don't see > my new addr

max-size-bytes and paging-max-size bytes

2025-06-04 Thread Franck Malka
Hi, All In my broker.xml I configured different address-settings for different address name matches. mainly altering max-size-bytes and paging-max-size bytes parameters. I do observe significant improvement in performance with the new settings. What I don't understand is that on the JMX co