As I mentioned, using something like "name#" or "name*" might work for your use-case technically speaking, but that's relying on undocumented (and unintended) behavior. I recommend you change to using a delimiter (e.g. "name.#" or "name.*").
Justin On Wed, Jun 4, 2025 at 11:54 AM Franck Malka <fma...@modulo.co.il> wrote: > I upgraded from 2.14 to 2.41 > in 2.14 name# was working fine. > > > > On Wed, Jun 4, 2025 at 7:24 PM Justin Bertram <jbert...@apache.org> wrote: > > > Are you referring to the "match" of an "address-setting"? If so, "name*" > > looks a little strange. As the documentation [1] states: > > > > > An Apache ActiveMQ Artemis wildcard expression contains words separated > > by a delimiter. The default delimiter is '.' (full stop). > > > > > > The special characters '#' and '*' also have special meaning and can > take > > the place of a word. > > > > > > To be clear, the wildcard characters cannot be used like wildcards in a > > regular expression. They operate exclusively on words separated by a > > delimiter. > > > > You should almost certainly be using something like "name.*". Using > "name*" > > might work for your use-case technically speaking, but that's relying on > > undocumented (and unintended) behavior. > > > > > > Justin > > > > [1] > > > > > https://activemq.apache.org/components/artemis/documentation/latest/wildcard-syntax.html#wildcard-syntax > > > > On Wed, Jun 4, 2025 at 11:04 AM Franck Malka <fma...@modulo.co.il> > wrote: > > > > > I sorted it out by replacing the match prefix from "name#" to "name*" > > > > > > On Wed, Jun 4, 2025 at 6:59 PM Justin Bertram <jbert...@apache.org> > > wrote: > > > > > > > Can you be more specific about where exactly you're looking? If > > possible, > > > > steps to reproduce the behavior you're observing would be ideal. > > > > > > > > > > > > Justin > > > > > > > > On Wed, Jun 4, 2025 at 4:18 AM Franck Malka <fma...@modulo.co.il> > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > Hi, All > > > > > > > > > > In my broker.xml I configured different address-settings for > > different > > > > > address name matches. > > > > > mainly altering max-size-bytes and paging-max-size bytes > parameters. > > > > > I do observe significant improvement in performance with the new > > > > settings. > > > > > > > > > > What I don't understand is that on the JMX console in the GUI, I > > don't > > > > see > > > > > my new address-settings are reflected there. Any idea what I might > be > > > > doing > > > > > wrong? > > > > > > > > > > -Franck. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
