le.com/low-persistent-messaging-performance-using-kahadb-tp2367478p3037432.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
m/low-persistent-messaging-performance-using-kahadb-tp26747184p26791867.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Rob Davies
http://twitter.com/rajdavies
I work here: http://fusesource.com
My Blog: http://rajdavies.blogspot.com/
I'm writing this: http://www.manning.com/snyder/
ow configure kahadb (or message producer) to get
>> better results?
>>
>> Duro
>>
>>
>
>
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/low-persistent-messaging-performance-using-kahadb-tp26747184p26791867.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
.3.1 snapshot. Why is that? Is
> it possible to somehow configure kahadb (or message producer) to get
> better results?
>
> Duro
>
>
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/low-persistent-messaging-performance-using-kahadb-tp26747184p26779912.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
;>> - 1 producer
>>> - 25 kb message size (10 000 msgs)
>>>
>>> according this, kahadb has troughput 22 msgs/s while
>>> kahaPersistenceAdapter
>>> 333 msgs/s. Similar difference observed using kahadb with amq 5.3, amq
>>> 5.4
>>> sn
has troughput 22 msgs/s while
>> kahaPersistenceAdapter
>> 333 msgs/s. Similar difference observed using kahadb with amq 5.3, amq
>> 5.4
>> snapshot and 5.3.1 snapshot. Why is that? Is it possible to somehow
>> configure kahadb (or message producer) to get better result
. Similar difference observed using
> kahadb with amq 5.3, amq 5.4 snapshot and 5.3.1 snapshot. Why is that? Is
> it possible to somehow configure kahadb (or message producer) to get
> better results?
>
> Duro
>
>
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/low-
pter
> 333 msgs/s. Similar difference observed using kahadb with amq 5.3, amq 5.4
> snapshot and 5.3.1 snapshot. Why is that? Is it possible to somehow
> configure kahadb (or message producer) to get better results?
>
> Duro
>
> --
> View this message in context:
>
using kahadb with amq 5.3, amq 5.4
snapshot and 5.3.1 snapshot. Why is that? Is it possible to somehow
configure kahadb (or message producer) to get better results?
Duro
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/low-persistent-messaging-performance-using-kahadb-tp26747184p26747184
