by putting this config KahaDB, I had the same performance as
Kahapersistenceadaptor:
<persistenceAdapter>
<kahaDB directory="${activemq.base}/data/kahadb"
enableJournalDiskSyncs="false" indexWriteBatchSize="10000"
indexCacheSize="1000"/>
</ persistenceAdapter>
titexe
titexe wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> using kahaDB, could you have the same performance?
>
> Because I encounter the same problem, even using what in
> ActiveMQ-througthput.xml
>
> best regards,
>
> titexe
>
> Duro wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> i've tested kahadb and kahaPersistenceAdapter using same simple test
>> conditions i.e.
>>
>> - persistent queue
>> - 3 consumers
>> - 1 producer
>> - 25 kb message size (10 000 msgs)
>>
>> according this, kahadb has troughput 22 msgs/s while
>> kahaPersistenceAdapter 333 msgs/s. Similar difference observed using
>> kahadb with amq 5.3, amq 5.4 snapshot and 5.3.1 snapshot. Why is that? Is
>> it possible to somehow configure kahadb (or message producer) to get
>> better results?
>>
>> Duro
>>
>>
>
>
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/low-persistent-messaging-performance-using-kahadb-tp26747184p26791867.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
