AW: Suspected slow replication

2024-05-03 Thread Arno Schuerhoff
binary identical to same file on primary server0. So, problem seems persisting the headers in journal on backup broker. Kind regards, Arno Von: Arno Schuerhoff Gesendet: Montag, 29. April 2024 09:09 An: users@activemq.apache.org Betreff: AW: Suspected slow replication Hello Justin, I have created

AW: Suspected slow replication

2024-04-29 Thread Arno Schuerhoff
@activemq.apache.org Betreff: Re: Suspected slow replication I'm not aware of anything related to reloading broker. xml that would impact replication, and I don't think replication itself will change the size of the message (e. g. via adding headers). Replication is performed at the journal level s

Re: Suspected slow replication

2024-04-25 Thread Justin Bertram
sender of that messages, but only information is > time point and size of application properies. > > Is there any option to get more log output from live or backup broker to > get more message properties like queue name? > > Kind regards, > Arno > > > > Von: Arno Schuer

AW: Suspected slow replication

2024-04-25 Thread Arno Schuerhoff
output from live or backup broker to get more message properties like queue name? Kind regards, Arno Von: Arno Schuerhoff Gesendet: Dienstag, 23. April 2024 13:54 An: users@activemq.apache.org Betreff: Suspected slow replication Hello all, we are using Artemis MQ in a fail-safe configuration

Suspected slow replication

2024-04-23 Thread Arno Schuerhoff
Hello all, we are using Artemis MQ in a fail-safe configuration with active primary broker and replicating backup. This works since years and many thanks for this great application. Some weeks ago, we have replaced old broker pair by a fresh installation using Artemis MQ version 2.31.2. Startin