Thanks！
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Message-order-when-use-PooledConnectionFactory-tp4690796p4692256.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
If you absolutely have to have messages get sent in a well-defined order,
you'd use a single thread instead of many to do your sends, or you'd
implement your own synchronization around anywhere your threads called
send().
On Feb 2, 2015 12:03 PM, "bencaogm" wrote:
> Hello!
>
> I use spring's JmsT
On Mon, Jul 7, 2008 at 7:10 AM, aftab gardan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> hi every body,
> i have a problem with message ordering.
>
> I create message A and Message B.
> when consumer catch message A, message A-2 created.
> i want to run message A-2 before message B.
>
> all message in same queu
Forgot to mention..using 4.0.1
Al
AlB wrote:
>
> I can reproduce it on linux redhat release 4, kernal release:
> 2.6.9-55.ELsmp, kernal version: #1 SMP Fri Apr 20 17:03:35 EDT 2007, sun
> java jre: Standard Edition (build 1.5.0_07-b03)
>
> Al Breight
>
>
> James.Strachan wrote:
>>
>> On
I can reproduce it on linux redhat release 4, kernal release: 2.6.9-55.ELsmp,
kernal version: #1 SMP Fri Apr 20 17:03:35 EDT 2007, sun java jre: Standard
Edition (build 1.5.0_07-b03)
Al Breight
James.Strachan wrote:
>
> On 8/17/06, massive.boisson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> if
I figured that most people here use Java so I am attaching a java example of
message mis-ordering. c++ api uses stomp, java uses openwire - still same
problem. it appears that every now and then one message gets ahead of the
others. to recap : non-durable topic, one publisher, one subscriber.
apparently it's a bug. http://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-729
http://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-729
thank u all
Iakov wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I am a new ActiveMQ user and came across an issue. it is my understanding
> that the message order in the below setup should be p
