Forgot to mention......using 4.0.1 Al
AlB wrote: > > I can reproduce it on linux redhat release 4, kernal release: > 2.6.9-55.ELsmp, kernal version: #1 SMP Fri Apr 20 17:03:35 EDT 2007, sun > java jre: Standard Edition (build 1.5.0_07-b03) > > Al Breight > > > James.Strachan wrote: >> >> On 8/17/06, massive.boisson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> if I have multiple producers, one consumer and persistent queue. Is the >>> order within the messages produced by one producer guaranteed to be in >>> that >>> same order as they arrive onto the consumer? >> >> Yes AFAIK >> >> >>> Reading docs, I thought yes, but then I found out about this post >>> (http://www.nabble.com/Messages-received-in-wrong-order-tf1698342.html#a4608882) >>> and this related jira issue >>> (http://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-729) which claims there is >>> a >>> bug with this >> >> So far we've not been able to reproduce this issue. >> >> >>> FWIW, I tried to execute the jira test case but on Windows machine >>> (which >>> obviously changes everything) and with 4.0.1. It all worked. >>> >>> I wonder if this scenarion is supposed to work with AMQ, and if I can do >>> anything else to reproduce the bug? Any ideas? >> >> Am not sure how else we can reroduce it. It could well be fixed in 4.0 >> onwards (there have been many bug fixes since 4.0-RC2). I wonder if >> any solaris users can reproduce the issue? >> >> -- >> >> James >> ------- >> http://radio.weblogs.com/0112098/ >> >> > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/message-order-tf2120601s2354.html#a12931371 Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
