On 27/07/2010 18:30, cobrien wrote:
>
> if slave=false always it sounds like a bug to me. a similar bug was
> reported, AMQ-2669, that looks like this one and is reported fixed in 5.4.0.
>
> https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-2669
Yup, I upgraded to 5.4.0 and this is working fine no
if slave=false always it sounds like a bug to me. a similar bug was
reported, AMQ-2669, that looks like this one and is reported fixed in 5.4.0.
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-2669
-clark
www.ttmsolutions.com
ActiveMQ reference guide at
http://bit.ly/AMQRefGuide
Andrew Wasil
Hi Clark,
> Could you satisfy your requirements using advisory messages to listen for
> the ActiveMQ.Advisory.MasterBroker notification to keep track of who is the
> master broker?
>
> http://activemq.apache.org/advisory-message.html
Thanks for your answer. Yeah, I guess this could work for
Andrew,
Could you satisfy your requirements using advisory messages to listen for
the ActiveMQ.Advisory.MasterBroker notification to keep track of who is the
master broker?
http://activemq.apache.org/advisory-message.html
Clark
www.ttmsolutions.com
ActiveMQ reference guide at
http://bit.ly/A
