if slave=false always it sounds like a bug to me. a similar bug was reported, AMQ-2669, that looks like this one and is reported fixed in 5.4.0.
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-2669 -clark www.ttmsolutions.com ActiveMQ reference guide at http://bit.ly/AMQRefGuide Andrew Wasilczuk-2 wrote: > > > > >> Could you satisfy your requirements using advisory messages to listen for >> the ActiveMQ.Advisory.MasterBroker notification to keep track of who is >> the >> master broker? >> >> http://activemq.apache.org/advisory-message.html > > > Thanks for your answer. Yeah, I guess this could work for what I'm > trying to do, however it seems a little complicated for something that > should be very simple to do and it will increase the complexity of my > system (additional consumer + processing). > > In an ideal world I'd expect to get this sort of information from > activemq-admin. Do you think it's worth raising a feature request on > JIRA? > > > Cheers, > > > Andrew. > -- > [ Andrew Wasilczuk | Service Support Engineer ] > [ NetDev Limited | http://netdev.co.uk ] > > -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/master-slave-status-command-tp29265876p29278800.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
