I think it should be asap! We need to vote on it though first
On Jul 24, 2007, at 4:42 AM, Jim Alateras wrote:
Rob,
Do you have a date for the 5.0 release?
cheers
Rob Davies wrote:
It was decided that because of the need to use JDK 5.0 - version
4.2 should be re-named as 5.0 - so no differ
Rob,
Do you have a date for the 5.0 release?
cheers
Rob Davies wrote:
It was decided that because of the need to use JDK 5.0 - version 4.2
should be re-named as 5.0 - so no difference at all ;)
On Jul 17, 2007, at 2:19 PM, Jim Alateras wrote:
I was just wondering whether the only difference
It was decided that because of the need to use JDK 5.0 - version 4.2
should be re-named as 5.0 - so no difference at all ;)
On Jul 17, 2007, at 2:19 PM, Jim Alateras wrote:
I was just wondering whether the only difference between the two
versions was that the 5.0 was target for JDK 5.x.
ch
