Thanks Andrew!
On 6 May 2009, at 15:33, ee7arh wrote:
Please also fix this page too:
http://activemq.apache.org/networks-of-brokers.html
Order should be:
networkConnectors
persistenceAdapter
transportConnectors
Bregards
Andrew
Gary Tully wrote:
Hi Andrew, thanks. No need to raise a jira
Please also fix this page too:
http://activemq.apache.org/networks-of-brokers.html
Order should be:
networkConnectors
persistenceAdapter
transportConnectors
Bregards
Andrew
Gary Tully wrote:
>
> Hi Andrew, thanks. No need to raise a jira issue. I just updated that page
> to fix the order. Th
Hi Andrew, thanks. No need to raise a jira issue. I just updated that page
to fix the order. That page was produced before schema validation was
enabled. As the broker element is a sequence, order is important.
You can see the xml schema at http://activemq.apache.org/xml-reference.html
2009/3/31
Hi,
I had a very similar problem except that ActiveMQ complained because my
was declared after my .
When I put the first then all worked fine. What is
confusing is that on the ActiveMQ docs it has an example showing that this
will work the other way around:
http://activemq.apache.org/amq-mes
Here's a sample spring cfg file that I've used to start an 'embedded'
ActiveMQ broker. Note how the connectionFactory bean points the embedded
broker to an external ActiveMQ broker cfg file, which I have also included
below. Within the broker cfg file you can define your transport and network
conn
I ran into the same problem. The networkConnectors need to be first in the
XML declaration.
Michal Singer wrote:
>
> Hi. I am trying to raise an embedded Active MQ broker using sprin