Please also fix this page too: http://activemq.apache.org/networks-of-brokers.html
Order should be: networkConnectors persistenceAdapter transportConnectors Bregards Andrew Gary Tully wrote: > > Hi Andrew, thanks. No need to raise a jira issue. I just updated that page > to fix the order. That page was produced before schema validation was > enabled. As the broker element is a sequence, order is important. > > You can see the xml schema at > http://activemq.apache.org/xml-reference.html > > 2009/3/31 ee7arh <andrew.hu...@2e-systems.com> > >> >> >> Hi, >> >> I had a very similar problem except that ActiveMQ complained because my >> <persistenceAdapter> was declared after my <transportConnectors>. >> >> When I put the <persistenceAdapter> first then all worked fine. What is >> confusing is that on the ActiveMQ docs it has an example showing that >> this >> will work the other way around: >> >> http://activemq.apache.org/amq-message-store.html >> http://activemq.apache.org/amq-message-store.html >> >> Is this actually a bug in ActiveMQ? Should I raise an issue? >> >> Thanks >> Andrew >> >> -- >> View this message in context: >> http://www.nabble.com/Active-MQ-broker-embedded-with-spring-configuration-problems-tp15253117p22804988.html >> Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >> >> > > > -- > http://blog.garytully.com > > Open Source SOA > http://FUSESource.com > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Active-MQ-broker-embedded-with-spring-configuration-problems-tp15253117p23407600.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
