before an upgrade, take a copy/backup of the data directory that can
be used as a fallback.
On 6 July 2014 12:18, khandelwalanuj wrote:
> But ideally it should be supported.
>
> It may be possible that after switching broker to 5.10, broker or clients
> can face some issues. In such scenerios, we
Patches happily accepted.
Sent from my pressure cooker.
> On Jul 6, 2014, at 5:18, khandelwalanuj wrote:
>
> But ideally it should be supported.
>
> It may be possible that after switching broker to 5.10, broker or clients
> can face some issues. In such scenerios, we revert broker back to 5.8
On 07/06/2014 07:18 AM, khandelwalanuj wrote:
But ideally it should be supported.
It may be possible that after switching broker to 5.10, broker or clients
can face some issues. In such scenerios, we revert broker back to 5.8. It
should be backward compatible.
Thanks,
Anuj
--
View this messa
But ideally it should be supported.
It may be possible that after switching broker to 5.10, broker or clients
can face some issues. In such scenerios, we revert broker back to 5.8. It
should be backward compatible.
Thanks,
Anuj
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nab
On 07/05/2014 07:54 AM, khandelwalanuj wrote:
Hi Gary,
When i switch my broker from 5.8 to 5.10, everything seems to be normal and
works fine. But when I switch back from 5.10 to 5.8, I am seeing issues.
Below are the details of my configuration:
1. Using MultikahaDB.
Configuration:
*
Hi Gary,
When i switch my broker from 5.8 to 5.10, everything seems to be normal and
works fine. But when I switch back from 5.10 to 5.8, I am seeing issues.
Below are the details of my configuration:
1. Using MultikahaDB.
Configuration:
*
That is not good. We try and do auto updates - the test is at
https://github.com/apache/activemq/blob/trunk/activemq-unit-tests/src/test/java/org/apache/activemq/store/kahadb/KahaDBVersionTest.java
I wonder what is different in your store?
You could just rebuild the index, use forceRecoverIndex o
I captured the same sentiments in a blog post a while back:
http://blog.garytully.com/2010/08/reminder-jms-is-client-server.html
On 25 June 2014 12:26, Petter Nordlander wrote:
> Hi,
>
> See release notes: http://activemq.apache.org/activemq-5100-release.html
> and http://activemq.apache.org/act
Hi,
See release notes: http://activemq.apache.org/activemq-5100-release.html
and http://activemq.apache.org/activemq-590-release.html
The text that you need to look at for 5.8-5.10 follows:
(AMQ 5.10)
Migration Guide
* Removed
org.apache.activemq.camel.converter.IdentityMessageReuseConver
I work in critical production environment. And I am switching my broker from
5.8 to 5.10. But clients will be keep on using 5.5/5.8 only for atleast 6
months.
I just want to make sure if there are there any sort of compatibility issues
?
Thanks,
Anuj
--
View this message in context:
http://
We migrated from 5.8 to 5.10 without any problem.
Which protocol are you using ?
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/ACtivemq-5-10-compatibility-tp4682244p4682342.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Did anyone get a chance to look at this ?
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/ACtivemq-5-10-compatibility-tp4682244p4682321.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
12 matches
Mail list logo