I captured the same sentiments in a blog post a while back: http://blog.garytully.com/2010/08/reminder-jms-is-client-server.html
On 25 June 2014 12:26, Petter Nordlander <petter.nordlan...@enfo.se> wrote: > Hi, > > See release notes: http://activemq.apache.org/activemq-5100-release.html > and http://activemq.apache.org/activemq-590-release.html > > The text that you need to look at for 5.8-5.10 follows: > > (AMQ 5.10) > > > Migration Guide > * Removed > org.apache.activemq.camel.converter.IdentityMessageReuseConverter class > from the activemq-camel component. > ‹‹‹‹‹ > > (AMQ 5.9) > > > There are some changes in 5.9 that may require user intervention > 1. Schema change to JDBC Persistence Adapter. XID column type change. > > * If you use XA transactions you need to ensure there are no XA > transactions pending completion before you upgrade. Some mode detail in > AMQ-4628 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-4628> > > > ‹‹‹‹ > > However, there will always be a risk of new features and bug fixes that > might cause new bugs. I suggest you test your scenarios before switching > the live environment. Better safe than sorry! > > BR Petter Nordlander > > > > Den 2014-06-25 09:06 skrev khandelwalanuj <khandelwal.anu...@gmail.com>: > >>I work in critical production environment. And I am switching my broker >>from >>5.8 to 5.10. But clients will be keep on using 5.5/5.8 only for atleast 6 >>months. >>I just want to make sure if there are there any sort of compatibility >>issues >>? >> >> >>Thanks, >>Anuj >> >> >> >>-- >>View this message in context: >>http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/ACtivemq-5-10-compatibility-tp468224 >>4p4682461.html >>Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > -- http://redhat.com http://blog.garytully.com
