R: MQTT stealing link issues with Artemis deployed on Kubernetes in HA

2023-12-19 Thread andrea bisogno
Hi Justin, many thanks for your reply and sorry for the wrong terminology I used. Andrea Da: Justin Bertram Inviato: lunedì 18 dicembre 2023 20:59 A: users@activemq.apache.org Oggetto: Re: MQTT stealing link issues with Artemis deployed on Kubernetes in HA

Re: MQTT stealing link issues with Artemis deployed on Kubernetes in HA

2023-12-18 Thread Justin Bertram
After looking at this a bit longer I believe I see what's happening. Section 3.1.4 of the MQTT 5 specification states: > If the ClientID represents a Client already connected to the Server, the Server sends a DISCONNECT > packet to the existing Client with Reason Code of 0x8E (Session taken over)

Re: MQTT stealing link issues with Artemis deployed on Kubernetes in HA

2023-12-18 Thread Justin Bertram
Can you work up a reproducer that doesn't involve that operator? For what it's worth, the terminology you used in your description seems fundamentally ambiguous. You talk about "HA mode", "replicas", etc. This terminology has a specific meaning in ActiveMQ Artemis and apparently a different meanin

MQTT stealing link issues with Artemis deployed on Kubernetes in HA

2023-12-18 Thread andrea bisogno
Hi team, I'm facing some unexpected MQTT stealing link issues with Artemis deployed on Kubernetes in High Availability (i.e. with the broker pods number >= 2). I've described the test scenario, and the corresponding unexpected behavior, here: https://github.com/artemiscloud/activemq-artemis-ope