Can you work up a reproducer that doesn't involve that operator? For what it's worth, the terminology you used in your description seems fundamentally ambiguous. You talk about "HA mode", "replicas", etc. This terminology has a specific meaning in ActiveMQ Artemis and apparently a different meaning in Kubernetes. For example, in ActiveMQ Artemis HA is supported via active/passive broker pairs. However, from what I can tell, HA in Kubernetes is just multiple "pods" running the same configuration - something that would generally be referred to just as a "cluster" in ActiveMQ Artemis. Therefore, when you use these terms in describing your use-case it gets confusing about what the actual broker configuration is - which is mainly what we (on this list) care about.
Justin On Mon, Dec 18, 2023 at 5:33 AM andrea bisogno <bisoma...@hotmail.it> wrote: > Hi team, > > I'm facing some unexpected MQTT stealing link issues with Artemis deployed > on Kubernetes in High Availability (i.e. with the broker pods number >= 2). > > I've described the test scenario, and the corresponding unexpected > behavior, here: > https://github.com/artemiscloud/activemq-artemis-operator/discussions/756 > > Can you help me with this? > > Many thanks in advance, > > > Andrea Bisogno >
