Re: Lost non-persistent messages

2012-08-02 Thread Tom Martinec
Thanks for replies... Any message actually never got lost. What I saw was just a few confusing observations:) -- View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Lost-non-persistent-messages-tp4654526p4654718.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at

Re: Lost non-persistent messages

2012-07-30 Thread Gary Tully
ion=1202153&view=markup > > Anyway, should the producer be blocked? > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Lost-non-persistent-messages-tp4654526p4654530.html > Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- http://fusesource.com http://blog.garytully.com

Re: Lost non-persistent messages

2012-07-30 Thread Tom Martinec
w this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Lost-non-persistent-messages-tp4654526p4654530.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Lost non-persistent messages

2012-07-30 Thread Gary Tully
> By the way, the responsible code (in my guess) is in > org.apache.activemq.broker.region.cursors.FilePendingMessageCursor.tryAddMessageLast. > > Regards, > Tomas > > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Lost-non-per

Lost non-persistent messages

2012-07-30 Thread Tom Martinec
is in org.apache.activemq.broker.region.cursors.FilePendingMessageCursor.tryAddMessageLast. Regards, Tomas -- View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Lost-non-persistent-messages-tp4654526.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.