gtully wrote > > iirc that is better in 5.6 > well, have not tried 5.6, but the same problem is likely to be there too, because the code in tryAddMessageLast looks the same:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/activemq/trunk/activemq-core/src/main/java/org/apache/activemq/broker/region/cursors/FilePendingMessageCursor.java?revision=1202153&view=markup http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/activemq/trunk/activemq-core/src/main/java/org/apache/activemq/broker/region/cursors/FilePendingMessageCursor.java?revision=1202153&view=markup Anyway, should the producer be blocked? -- View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Lost-non-persistent-messages-tp4654526p4654530.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
