arek Psiuk
I should add that I am using AMQ core version 5.2.0, so I am not benefiting
from recent bug fixes regarding this issue such as the one mentioned above.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Issues-with-Network-of-Brokers-and-Message-Selectors-tp23296281p23952353.htm
er (without the
>>> consumer)
>>> > are transferred over, EVEN THOSE MESSAGES THAT DO NOT MATCH THE
>>> SELECTOR
>>> > EXPRESSION. THOSE MESSAGES ARE NOW TRAPPED ON THAT BROKER.
>>> >
>>> > How can I avoid transferring messages f
> EXPRESSION. THOSE MESSAGES ARE NOW TRAPPED ON THAT BROKER.
>> >
>> > How can I avoid transferring messages for which there is no consumer
>> than
>> > can ACTUALLY consume the messages???
>> >
>> > I have condensed the experiment into a sm
ED ON THAT BROKER.
> >
> > How can I avoid transferring messages for which there is no consumer than
> > can ACTUALLY consume the messages???
> >
> > I have condensed the experiment into a small Java class and attached it:
> > http://www.nabble.com/file/p23296281/Sele
gt; Thanks,
> Elliot
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://www.nabble.com/Issues-with-Network-of-Brokers-and-Message-Selectors-tp23296281p23296281.html
> Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>
ACTUALLY consume the messages???
I have condensed the experiment into a small Java class and attached it:
http://www.nabble.com/file/p23296281/SelectorBrokerNetworkTest.java
SelectorBrokerNetworkTest.java
Thanks,
Elliot
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Issues-with-Network-of
