I should add that I am using AMQ core version 5.2.0, so I am not benefiting from recent bug fixes regarding this issue such as the one mentioned above.
Elliot Barlas wrote: > > I have tried that as you can see from the attached code. It still does > not work. > > > Dejan Bosanac wrote: >> >> Hi Elliot, >> >> you have to turn off conduit subscriptions in order to have selectors >> work >> over the network. Take a look at this link for more details >> >> http://activemq.apache.org/networks-of-brokers.html#NetworksofBrokers-WhentouseandnotuseConduitsubscriptions >> >> Cheers >> -- >> Dejan Bosanac >> >> Open Source Integration - http://fusesource.com/ >> ActiveMQ in Action - http://www.manning.com/snyder/ >> Blog - http://www.nighttale.net >> >> >> On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 5:26 AM, Giovani Seben <gse...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> Elliot, >>> >>> This looks very similar to an issue fixed a couple of months ago. Check >>> out: >>> http://fusesource.com/issues/browse/MB-438 >>> or alternatively for AMQ: >>> https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-2104 >>> >>> HTH, >>> -Giovani >>> >>> On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 1:21 PM, Elliot Barlas <elliotbar...@gmail.com >>> >wrote: >>> >>> > >>> > I have been experimenting with the behavior of a network of two AMQ >>> brokers >>> > and message selecting consumers. As described in the AMQ >>> documentation >>> > (http://activemq.apache.org/networks-of-brokers.html), consuming with >>> > message selectors in a broker network environment can lead to messages >>> > being >>> > trapped on one of the brokers. >>> > >>> > Setup: >>> > -2 AMQ Brokers connected by static URIs. Using all default settings. >>> > -2 Producers, 1 connected to each Broker. >>> > -Each producer sends 100 non persistent, non expiring messages. >>> > -1 message selecting consumer connects to 1 Broker and consumes all >>> > matching >>> > messages. >>> > -Observation: the 100 messages from the other Broker (without the >>> consumer) >>> > are transferred over, EVEN THOSE MESSAGES THAT DO NOT MATCH THE >>> SELECTOR >>> > EXPRESSION. THOSE MESSAGES ARE NOW TRAPPED ON THAT BROKER. >>> > >>> > How can I avoid transferring messages for which there is no consumer >>> than >>> > can ACTUALLY consume the messages??? >>> > >>> > I have condensed the experiment into a small Java class and attached >>> it: >>> > http://www.nabble.com/file/p23296281/SelectorBrokerNetworkTest.java >>> > SelectorBrokerNetworkTest.java >>> > >>> > Thanks, >>> > Elliot >>> > -- >>> > View this message in context: >>> > >>> http://www.nabble.com/Issues-with-Network-of-Brokers-and-Message-Selectors-tp23296281p23296281.html >>> > Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >>> > >>> > >>> >> >> >> ----- >> Dejan Bosanac >> >> Open Source Integration - http://fusesource.com/ >> ActiveMQ in Action - http://www.manning.com/snyder/ >> Blog - http://www.nighttale.net >> > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Issues-with-Network-of-Brokers-and-Message-Selectors-tp23296281p23322595.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
