I have an Apache ActiveMQ broker with a HTTP transportConnector. I try to
connect java consumers to it. After about 250 consumers the time to establish a
connection increases linearly. Cpu and memory usage remains low, so I don't
understand what is going wrong. The slow parts are createConnectio
Filed https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARTEMIS-2132
--
Sent from: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-User-f2341805.html
Thanks for sorting this out Justin! Is there an issue filed with JIRA already
or should I create one?
> Out of curiosity, why are you using the HTTP transport. I don't think
> it's
> commonly used.
Firewall-friendliness and architecture restrictions are the main driver.
&
quest
>> cannot be cast to io.netty.buffer.ByteBuf [code=GENERIC_EXCEPTION]
>>
>> Indicates to me that you're hitting a bug.
>>
>> Out of curiosity, why are you using the HTTP transport. I don't think
>> it's commonly used.
>>
>>
>> Jus
detected:
> io.netty.handler.codec.http.HttpObjectAggregator$AggregatedFullHttpRequest
> cannot be cast to io.netty.buffer.ByteBuf [code=GENERIC_EXCEPTION]
>
> Indicates to me that you're hitting a bug.
>
> Out of curiosity, why are you using the HTTP transport. I don't think
> it's commonly used.
>
g the HTTP transport. I don't think it's
commonly used.
Justin
On Mon, Oct 15, 2018 at 10:15 AM thokuest wrote:
> I just started using ActiveMQ Artemis and would like to check whether I'm
> doing something wrong or if I hit a bug.
>
> I want to consume messages f
I just started using ActiveMQ Artemis and would like to check whether I'm
doing something wrong or if I hit a bug.
I want to consume messages from a multicast address via HTTP transport. I
tweaked the http-transport example
(apache-artemis-2.6.3/examples/features/standard/http-transport) f
d from a client without proxy the
http transport works.
That's the stack trace:
Exception in thread "main" javax.jms.JMSException: Failed to create session
factory
at
org.apache.activemq.artemis.jms.client.ActiveMQConnectionFactory.createConnectionInternal(Acti
Great, thank you for confirming that the fix can be successfully patched
onto 5.12.
Tim
On Tue, Jan 9, 2018 at 11:34 PM, sampath516 wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Thank you. We have applied the below fix on 5.12 and it working fine now.
>
> Thanks,
> Sampathi G
>
>
>
> --
> Sent from: http://activemq.228
Hi All,
Thank you. We have applied the below fix on 5.12 and it working fine now.
Thanks,
Sampathi G
--
Sent from: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-User-f2341805.html
ems to indicate that it's not related to
> Java 8.
>
> Tim
>
> On Dec 28, 2017 2:08 AM, "sampath516" wrote:
>
>> Hi All,
>>
>> The prefetch=0 option is not working for the combination: ActiveMQ
>> 5.12-HTTP
>> Transport-Java 7. It is w
erenced in your first thread, and the fact that
it doesn't work undet Java 7 seems to indicate that it's not related to
Java 8.
Tim
On Dec 28, 2017 2:08 AM, "sampath516" wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> The prefetch=0 option is not working for the combination: ActiveMQ
> 5.12-H
Hi All,
The prefetch=0 option is not working for the combination: ActiveMQ 5.12-HTTP
Transport-Java 7. It is working fine for tcp transport but not for http
transport. Consumer is not able to pull messages from broker.
One more observation is that prefetch=0 is working fine with
ActiveMQ-5.8
Note that I have personally seen the HTTP transport consuming significant CPU
resources in the past. Be sure to measure performance and watch CPU
utilization. IIRC that's because the implementation frequently polls.
I recommend looking to an alternate approach. One I've implemented
can u help me?
>
> Thanks
> Neo.
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/HTTP-transport-tp4014555p4704907.html
> Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
hello,
I am using http protocol for AMQ, but I find it is slower than using
tcp. I guess that the cause are these dependencise, like jetty.
I do no know how to optimize it, can u help me?
Thanks
Neo.
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/HTTP-transport
I am trying to connect to ActiveMQ cluster which use levelDB, via http
transport , but the java client is not sending msg to broker, it is working
fine with tcp transport.
here are scenarios :
1) I use the same client with http transport to a SINGLE ActiveMQ server,
and it is sending the msg.
2
The HTTP transport converts the Openwire command objects to XML using a
text-based wire format (uses XStream under the covers). There is no binary
marshalling/unmarshalling involved here.
On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 2:03 AM, Steven Turner wrote:
> Can someone tell me here where is XML coming h
Ping. Help please!
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Use-case-of-http-transport-connector-tp4672325p4672859.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Can someone tell me here where is XML coming here in between HTTP and
openwire. It will be a very helpful for my project.
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Use-case-of-http-transport-connector-tp4672325p4672725.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing
Is it that the text encoded message is
converted to XML format and this xml payload is sent in a field in the HTTP
POST request? Could you please tell me what's the field name?
-Steven
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Use-case-of-http-transpor
On 7 Oct 2013, at 16:31, Steven Turner wrote:
> In addition to below post I also want to add some queries while using http
> transport.
>
> 1. The HTTP transport is used to tunnel over HTTP(hypertext transfer
> protocol) using XML payloads. http transport uses openwire, whic
with TCP transport connectors. I have also
> tried using http transport connector for java producers and consumers, it is
> working fine. But didn't get any useful scenario to use http transport
> connector, Can someone give me some use cases where it is useful and more
> efficient
Hey,
Can someone answer my queries, it will be a big help. Please someone explain
me about openwire and http protocol communication in ActiveMQ.
Thanks,
Steven
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Use-case-of-http-transport-connector-tp4672325p4672633.html
Hi,
I am also trying to use http transport, and I also like to know about http
transport more, I have searched on internet but didn't get much, If someone
from ActiveMQ dev team will help me.
In addition to above questions i want to ask:
-- Can ActiveMQ http transport be used for jav
In addition to below post I also want to add some queries while using http
transport.
1. The HTTP transport is used to tunnel over HTTP(hypertext transfer
protocol) using XML payloads. http transport uses openwire, which operates
in binary format while http protocol don't understand binary
Hi,
I am currently running my broker using TCP transport connector. I am trying
to use http transport connector for my broker, it is working properly,
Currently I am running it for local java producer and consumer. I am not
able to figure out when and in what cases we should use http transport
Hi,
I am currently running my broker with TCP transport connectors. I have also
tried using http transport connector for java producers and consumers, it is
working fine. But didn't get any useful scenario to use http transport
connector, Can someone give me some use cases where it is usefu
dejanb wrote
> Hi,
>
> there's a difference between Camel http component and ActiveMQ http
> transport. Both are solid for what they've been designed to do.
Thanks dejanb, and a huge thanks for all the mailing list answers over the
years, they've helped me get star
Hi,
there's a difference between Camel http component and ActiveMQ http
transport. Both are solid for what they've been designed to do.
Regards
--
Dejan Bosanac
--
Red Hat, Inc.
FuseSource is now part of Red Hat
dbosa...@redhat.com
Twitter: @dejanb
Blog: http://se
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/HTTP-transport-tp4014555p4669671.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Ok, seems I was mistaken that this was happening under 5.7, I must have been
hitting our 5.3.2 server. Sorry for the false alarm guys!
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Large-message-failure-over-http-transport-tp4659891p4660006.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ
wire, but even so when it gets to the
broker, the broker will have to uncompress it and convert back from XML to
an ActiveMQTextMessage which it can then handle. The
marshalling/unmarhsalling combined with the XML tags will turn large
messages (10MB) into much larger messages (80MB). HTTP transport
, mrloud wrote:
> Extracted from IRC chat with cposta:
>
> I'm getting "IOException: Could not post command" using the http transport
> on AMQ 5.7. Any tips on what I should be looking at to fix this? This is
> going to be a low volume, but possibly large message size
Extracted from IRC chat with cposta:
I'm getting "IOException: Could not post command" using the http transport
on AMQ 5.7. Any tips on what I should be looking at to fix this? This is
going to be a low volume, but possibly large message size, server.
I'm sending in a TextM
: http://www.manning.com/snyder/
On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 1:32 PM, mark.waltje wrote:
> That worked. Thanks!
> Maybe an idea that somebody adds this to the guides for noobs like me
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/http-
That worked. Thanks!
Maybe an idea that somebody adds this to the guides for noobs like me
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/http-transport-instead-of-tcp-tp4654580p4654590.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
http.message.AbstractHttpMessage
> at java.net.URLClassLoader$1.run(URLClassLoader.java:202)
> at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method)
> at java.net.URLClassLoader.findClass(URLClassLoader.java:190)
> at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:306)
> at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:247)
> ... 47 more
>
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/http-transport-instead-of-tcp-tp4654580.html
> Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
URLClassLoader.findClass(URLClassLoader.java:190)
at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:306)
at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:247)
... 47 more
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/http-transport-instead-of-tcp-tp4654580.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
We are using amq 5.6 in our Server alongside with tomcat and we want to use
the http transport (because some clients are behind firewalls and proxy
servers ).
the problem is that tomcat already runs on port 80 and we want the clients
to connect also on port 80.
I have 2 questions.
1. I want to
http://www.manning.com/snyder/
Blog - http://www.nighttale.net
On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 9:49 PM, JacobS wrote:
> Are there any plans to support tomcat as the http server ?
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/http-transport-on-tomcat-instead-of-jet
Thanks for your help, the http transport works now.
but my client gets disconnected after 60 seconds, any idea why ?
How can I configure it not to disconnect ?
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/use-Http-transport-in-version-5-5-0-with-osgi-tp4088466p4089408
ception
> cause-message : Cannot construct org.apache.activemq.util.ByteSequence
> as it does not have a no-args constructor
> class : org.apache.activemq.command.MessageDispatch
> required-type : org.apache.activemq.util.ByteSequence
> path:
> /org.a
:
/org.apache.activemq.command.MessageDispatch/message/content
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/use-Http-transport-in-version-5-5-0-with-osgi-tp4088466p407.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Thanks, a pom would really help
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/use-Http-transport-in-version-5-5-0-with-osgi-tp4088466p4088593.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
You'll have to shade it if I remember correctly, can send a pom later today.
On Nov 20, 2011, at 6:41, JacobS wrote:
> is it possible to use the http transport in amq 5.5.0 in an osgi environment
> ?
> because activemq-optional is not osgified I added it to the class-path o
is it possible to use the http transport in amq 5.5.0 in an osgi environment
?
because activemq-optional is not osgified I added it to the class-path of
the bundle starting the broker, and added the imports and exports to its
manifest, but I am getting exceptions telling me that the class
No, http transport is JMS compliant
Regards
--
Dejan Bosanac - http://twitter.com/dejanb
-
The experts in open source integration and messaging - http://fusesource.com
ActiveMQ in Action - http://www.manning.com/snyder/
Blog - http://www.nighttale.net
On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 1
Are there operational disadvantages to using HTTP transport?
I am thinking in terms of things like acknowledgements - behavioural
changes like Stomp vs Openwire.
James
On 8 November 2011 10:14, Dejan Bosanac wrote:
> Hi there are quite some folks that are using it in production, so i
Hi,
http transport is in an optional package for the exact reason of not
"polluting" activemq-core with a lot of dependencies, as it requires quite
some of them, like jetty (on the server side), http-client (on the client
side), xstream (and xml libs xstream needs) on both sides. Althou
gt; Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build 1.6.0_26-b03-383-11A511)
> Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM (build 20.1-b02-383, mixed mode)
>
> Ending memory use all roughly: 6M/81M
>
> HTTP Transport - Consumer
> =
>
> System Total Throughput: 12767
(r1075438; 2011-02-28 09:31:09-0800)
java version "1.6.0_26"
Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build 1.6.0_26-b03-383-11A511)
Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM (build 20.1-b02-383, mixed mode)
Ending memory use all roughly: 6M/81M
HTTP Transport - Consumer
=
Sy
If there are folks using this in production, then why isn't this feature in its
own module and not lumped together with all the other fluff in
activemq-optional?
I have ~12 dependency excludes when depending on that module to keep out
unwanted/unused stuff which is needed by other "optional" fe
Hi there are quite some folks that are using it in production, so it's
stable enough.
The main reason to use this protocol is if you need to go through some
firewall and you can't let regular openwire traffic through it. It will
basically use XStream to marshal messages to XML and send them using
This is of interest to me too.
Could use a description of it's behaviour which that page does not provide.
James
On 8 November 2011 01:45, Jason Dillon wrote:
> ... is this any good? I keep getting folks in the backseat making
> tunneling over HTTP a meta-requirement. Are there any significa
... is this any good? I keep getting folks in the backseat making tunneling
over HTTP a meta-requirement. Are there any significant issues with using the
http[s] transport in the activemq-optional module for this? Will use of it
totally kill performance?
Documentation is a bit weak here, I'v
e,
> especially if expire time is relatively small (like 30 seconds).
> On the other hand isn't it possible to exchange timestamp messages between
> broker and consumers so that consumers were aware of the broker's time (and
> vice versa ?)
> --
> View this message in co
vice versa ?)
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/HTTP-transport-consumers-do-not-receive-messages-tp3259132p3260003.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
ActiveMQ in Action - http://www.manning.com/snyder/
Blog - http://www.nighttale.net
On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 11:35 PM, lukast wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I am using ActiveMQ 5.4.2 and HTTP transport.
> On server A there is a web application with embeded ActiveMQ
> broker.(Tomacat
>
Hi,
I am using ActiveMQ 5.4.2 and HTTP transport.
On server A there is a web application with embeded ActiveMQ broker.(Tomacat
Web Container)
On server B there is ActiveMQ client application configured using Spring
DefaultMessageListenerContainer. (Tomcat Web Container)
After startup of both
Hi Mike,
you're right, HTTP transport and REST API are two different things. You
should be fine with just setting appropriate transport connector and using
that URL in your JMS client.
Cheers
--
Dejan Bosanac - http://twitter.com/dejanb
Open Source Integration - http://fusesource.com/
Act
ry much,
Mike
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/Sanity-Check%3A-HTTP-Transport-and-REST-same-or-different--tp28169562p28169562.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
a
reproducible test case?
Cheers
--
Dejan Bosanac - http://twitter.com/dejanb
Open Source Integration - http://fusesource.com/
ActiveMQ in Action - http://www.manning.com/snyder/
Blog - http://www.nighttale.net
On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 10:05 AM, muadd wrote:
Hi,
I've encountered simil
;
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/Bytesmessage-and-http-transport-tp21974419p27610461.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
t; Cheers
> > > --
> > > Dejan Bosanac - http://twitter.com/dejanb
> > >
> > > Open Source Integration - http://fusesource.com/
> > > ActiveMQ in Action - http://www.manning.com/snyder/
> > > Blog - http://www.nighttale.net
> > >
> > >
> &g
Is there a chance you can provide a
> > reproducible test case?
> >
> > Cheers
> > --
> > Dejan Bosanac - http://twitter.com/dejanb
> >
> > Open Source Integration - http://fusesource.com/
> > ActiveMQ in Action - http://www.manning.com/snyder/
> &g
an Bosanac - http://twitter.com/dejanb
>
> Open Source Integration - http://fusesource.com/
> ActiveMQ in Action - http://www.manning.com/snyder/
> Blog - http://www.nighttale.net
>
>
> On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 10:05 AM, muadd wrote:
>
>>
>> Hi,
>>
&
, 2010 at 10:05 AM, muadd wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I've encountered similar problem with http transport. When I try to get a
> message with 100KB+ payload (tried TextMessage and MapMessage), I get:
>
> 2010-02-16 09:37:28,147 | WARN | / | org.mortbay.log | btpool0-1 - /
> j
Hi,
I've encountered similar problem with http transport. When I try to get a
message with 100KB+ payload (tried TextMessage and MapMessage), I get:
2010-02-16 09:37:28,147 | WARN | / | org.mortbay.log | btpool0-1 - /
java.io.UTFDataFormatException: encoded string too long: 219486
Hello.
I know I'm getting away from JMS but since Streaming is supported and HTTP
transport is also available I'd like to know if it's possible or have anyone
tried using Streaming via HTTP?
The advantage is huge as HTTP transport is sometimes the only way to do NAT
traversal.
A
://old.nabble.com/Maximum-number-of-connections-with-HTTP-Transport-%28Jetty%29-tp27330057p27330057.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Hi, I have integrated activeMQ 5.3 into Jboss 4.2.3. It works fine with tcp
and vm tranport.
But I now I have to configure HTTP and HTTP tansport. I've seen that http
transport is done via Jetty server: there is no way to use the provided
JBoss tomcat?
Could you provide me a broker-confi
hi,
I have a 3 machine setup in which I have configured a pure master slave
broker topology. I have 1 client machine and 1 master and 1 slave. The
client is using failover uri and it works good when I use tcp transport.
When I switch to http transport, the problem is that failover doesnt
Cheers
--
Dejan Bosanac
Open Source Integration - http://fusesource.com/
ActiveMQ in Action - http://www.manning.com/snyder/
Blog - http://www.nighttale.net
On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 12:45 PM, libert wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm trying to send a BytesMessage (size : 1 MB max) using HT
Hi,
I'm trying to send a BytesMessage (size : 1 MB max) using HTTP transport but
it does not work.
In the ActiveMQ console, I get this :
java.io.UTFDataFormatException: encoded string too long: 208555 bytes
If I switch to openwire TCP, program is working fine ...
Is there any message
Hi,
the http transport is implemented with jetty server, so there is no way run
it with Tomcat. Note that http transport is not just a web application /
servlet and cannot be used out the ActiveMQ.
As for the client question, your client using hhtp transport should behave
as any regular JMS
r reason you prefer the http transport over the
> default tcp one? Http transport has many drawbacks and if you have Java
> clients, tcp should be the way to go.
>
> Cheers
> --
> Dejan Bosanac
>
> Open Source Integration - http://fusesource.com/
> ActiveMQ in Action
Hi,
is there any particular reason you prefer the http transport over the
default tcp one? Http transport has many drawbacks and if you have Java
clients, tcp should be the way to go.
Cheers
--
Dejan Bosanac
Open Source Integration - http://fusesource.com/
ActiveMQ in Action - http
p transfer take care of the polling of events?
Any pointers would be greatly appreciated.
Thank you!
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/HTTP-Transport-Configuration-with-Tomcat-tp21449577p21449577.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
s://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-1099
this should not be necessary.
Any ideas?
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/How-do-i-configure-the-http-transport-connector-to-use-a-proxy--tp16964261s2354p17109982.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Hi folks,
after i have figured out this problem (will be updated in the AMQ
documentation soon):
http://www.nabble.com/Standard-http-connector-example-not-working--td16937377s2354.html
i am having a new problem:
How do i configure the http transport connector to use a proxy?
I looked into
n you
> suggest which one will be the most suitable in terms of guaranteed message
> delivery? Raw performance is not really an issue as we are not looking at
> message rates beyond a few hundred messages per second. And can you point me
> to some working Perl code using Http tran
not really an issue as we are not looking at
message rates beyond a few hundred messages per second. And can you point me
to some working Perl code using Http transport & REST?
Thanks,
Ramit Arora
James.Strachan wrote:
>
> To talk to ActiveMQ via Perl, use the Perl Stomp client...
>
Connection.handle(HttpConnection.java:379)
> at
>
> org.mortbay.jetty.bio.SocketConnector$Connection.run(SocketConnector.java:226)
> at
>
> org.mortbay.thread.BoundedThreadPool$PoolThread.run(BoundedThreadPool.java:442)
>
> How can I send http messages from Perl?
>
> Thanks,
> Ramit Arora
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://www.nabble.com/Using-http-transport-from-a-Perl-client-tp15738834s2354p15738834.html
> Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>
--
James
---
http://macstrac.blogspot.com/
Open Source Integration
http://open.iona.com
)
at
org.mortbay.thread.BoundedThreadPool$PoolThread.run(BoundedThreadPool.java:442)
How can I send http messages from Perl?
Thanks,
Ramit Arora
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Using-http-transport-from-a-Perl-client-tp15738834s2354p15738834.html
Sent from the Act
TransportConnector.start(TransportConnector.java:220)
> at
> org.apache.activemq.broker.BrokerService.startTransportConnector(BrokerService.java:1519)
> at
> org.apache.activemq.broker.BrokerService.startAllConnectors(BrokerService.java:1471)
> at
> org.apache.activemq.broker.BrokerService.start(BrokerService.java:402)
> at
> org.apache.activemq.xbean.XBeanBrokerService.afterPropertiesSet(XBeanBrokerService.java:47)
> at
> org.springframework.beans.factory.support.AbstractAutowireCapableBeanFactory.invokeInitMethods(AbstractAutowireCapableBeanFactory.java:1062)
> at
> org.springframework.beans.factory.support.AbstractAutowireCapableBeanFactory.initializeBean(AbstractAutowireCapableBeanFactory.java:1029)
> ... 23 more
>
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Problem-configuring-HTTP-Transport-connector-tf4576103s2354.html#a13062422
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
ory.invokeInitMethods(AbstractAutowireCapableBeanFactory.java:1062)
at
org.springframework.beans.factory.support.AbstractAutowireCapableBeanFactory.initializeBean(AbstractAutowireCapableBeanFactory.java:1029)
... 23 more
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Problem-configuring-HTTP-Transport-connector-tf4576103s2354.html#a13062107
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
87 matches
Mail list logo
