This is of interest to me too. Could use a description of it's behaviour which that page does not provide.
James On 8 November 2011 01:45, Jason Dillon <ja...@planet57.com> wrote: > ... is this any good? I keep getting folks in the backseat making > tunneling over HTTP a meta-requirement. Are there any significant issues > with using the http[s] transport in the activemq-optional module for this? > Will use of it totally kill performance? > > Documentation is a bit weak here, I've just found this: > > http://activemq.apache.org/http-and-https-transports-reference.html > > Which points to a bunch of other places which point out issues. I'm > unsure what is resolved and what is still pending. > > I'm going to play with it and run some tests, but I was curious if the > community has collected any intel on use of this transport already? > > --jason
