parallel GC, so we never moved
ahead with it.
--
View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.
nabble.com/Artems-ParallelGC-vs-CMS-tp4721722p4721737.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Yes, we tested with G1 settings in load test environment. Old gen was still
increasing with it albeit a bit slower than parallel GC, so we never moved
ahead with it.
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Artems-ParallelGC-vs-CMS-tp4721722p4721737.html
Sent from
eing deprecated, great!
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.
> nabble.com/Artems-ParallelGC-vs-CMS-tp4721722p4721748.html
> Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
I didn't know the "incremental mode" is being deprecated, great!
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Artems-ParallelGC-vs-CMS-tp4721722p4721748.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-Original Message-
From: abhijith [mailto:topcoderabhij...@gmail.com]
Sent: 07 February 2017 18:53
To: users@activemq.apache.org
Subject: Artems: ParallelGC vs CMS
Hi,
Has there any test done for Artemis using CMS GC?
Context: We were using default parallel GC with 6G RAM and were facing an
stats could be really useful to help
to understand what is happened, there really too many cases to be covered!
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Artems-ParallelGC-vs-CMS-tp4721722p4721743.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
nternal(ActiveMQConnectionFactory.java:756)
> ~[artemis-jms-client-1.4.0.jar:1.4.0]
> ... 122 common frames omitted
>
> Thanks
> Abhi
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Artems-ParallelGC-vs-CMS-tp4721722.html
> Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
at
org.apache.activemq.artemis.jms.client.ActiveMQConnectionFactory.createConnectionInternal(ActiveMQConnectionFactory.java:756)
~[artemis-jms-client-1.4.0.jar:1.4.0]
... 122 common frames omitted
Thanks
Abhi
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Artems-ParallelGC-vs-CMS-tp4721722.html
Sent from the Activ