Hi! Just as a chrioisty, do you have tried G1 too?
Il mar 7 feb 2017, 22:07 abhijith <topcoderabhij...@gmail.com> ha scritto: > Hi, > > Has there any test done for Artemis using CMS GC? > > Context: We were using default parallel GC with 6G RAM and were facing an > issue where old gen was filling up without full GC being run. We use Netty > Transport configuration and have one master/slave setup with static > configuration. Our monitoring alerts for total memory usage were firing. > So we ran some tests and found that old gen was growing very slowly in case > of CMS, but very rapidly in case of parallel GC. > > We switched to using CMS, but after changing to CMS we started seeing > connection errors when session factory is trying to create a new > connection. > This was happening consistently which forced us to roll back. After > rollback with parallel gc we do not see this issue at all. We are kind of > confused on how selection of GC can affect creating new connections. Any > insight would be really helpful. > > GG parameters: "-XX:+UseFastAccessorMethods -Xms8G -Xmx8G > -XX:+UseConcMarkSweepGC -XX:+CMSIncrementalMode > -XX:CMSIncrementalDutyCycleMin=10 -XX:CMSIncrementalDutyCycle=20 > -XX:+CMSIncrementalPacing -XX:+CMSClassUnloadingEnabled " > > Caused by: > org.apache.activemq.artemis.api.core.ActiveMQIllegalStateException: > AMQ119024: Could not select a TransportConfiguration to create > SessionFactory > at > > org.apache.activemq.artemis.core.client.impl.ServerLocatorImpl.createSessionFactory(ServerLocatorImpl.java:773) > ~[artemis-core-client-1.4.0.jar:1.4.0] > at > > org.apache.activemq.artemis.jms.client.ActiveMQConnectionFactory.createConnectionInternal(ActiveMQConnectionFactory.java:756) > ~[artemis-jms-client-1.4.0.jar:1.4.0] > ... 122 common frames omitted > > Thanks > Abhi > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Artems-ParallelGC-vs-CMS-tp4721722.html > Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >
