Re: Q Consumers stop receiving messages

2009-02-12 Thread sweetjonnie
Gary Tully wrote: > > in transacted mode, who is managing the transaction demarcation? In > other words, where is the session.commit() call? > it turns out that this issue was not related to the other issues in this thread. i had failed to make the message-producers commit and this was respon

Re: ActiveMQ and JNDI provider

2009-02-09 Thread sweetjonnie
gregory.guibert wrote: > > Thank you for the link on OpenDS, it looks great and seems to solve half > my > problem (alignment of data) :-) > ... > When using a jndi.properties file to create an initial context, the file > looks like this: > java.naming.factory.initial = com.sun.jndi.ldap.LdapCtx

Re: Q Consumers stop receiving messages

2009-02-09 Thread sweetjonnie
Gary Tully wrote: > > in transacted mode, who is managing the transaction demarcation? In > other words, where is the session.commit() call? > This is a session based transaction as opposed to an external JTA operation. The COMMIT is, therefore, made against the jms session object. The call

Re: Q Consumers stop receiving messages

2009-02-07 Thread sweetjonnie
at least one in the thread mentioned persistence and i wonder if my problem is related. i am newbie/retarded and cannot get my embedded broker to deliver transacted messages to my async client in my ActiveMQ 5.2 environment. connection.createSession(false, Session.AUTO_ACKNOWLEDGE) works: messag

Re: ActiveMQ and JNDI provider

2009-02-07 Thread sweetjonnie
gregory.guibert wrote: > > In addition to the JMS-related objects, I need to bind/lookup other kinds > of > objects, so, the JNDI provider does not exactly fits my needs. > Using ActiveMQ with failover mechanism, I am searching for a JNDI > implementation with an equivalent *failover *mechanism