gregory.guibert wrote: > > In addition to the JMS-related objects, I need to bind/lookup other kinds > of > objects, so, the JNDI provider does not exactly fits my needs. > Using ActiveMQ with failover mechanism, I am searching for a JNDI > implementation with an equivalent *failover *mechanism and an *alignment > of > the stored objects* >
Alignment of stored objects ... do you mean that you need for the destinations and connection-factories residing in the persistent store behind the jndi provider always refer to the current broker? Wow. That's a stiff requirement, but fair enough. I would ask you whether you would require the same persistent store to hold your JMS Administered Objects as that which holds your "other kinds of objects". If you were to allow two separate repositories, then you could modify the other objects in the OpenDS directory and query your (hopefully aligned) JMS Administered Objects from ActiveMQ's JNDI persistent store. Sincerely, jonnie savell -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-and-JNDI-provider-tp21860956p21886292.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
