Thank you tabish121. I tried "vm://localhost?create=false" in my second
application and that worked.
I saw this information in VM transport
documentation(http://activemq.apache.org/vm-transport-reference.html)
earlier but the reason why did not try it earlier was because it said "Only
supported i
I tried the vm://localhost?create=false option but got the following
exception
Exception in thread "pool-3-thread-10"
org.springframework.jms.UncategorizedJmsException: Uncategorized exception
occured during JMS processing; nested exception is javax.jms.JMSException:
Could not create Transport. R
I started the First application (with broker @15:39) and waited a few minutes
and then later started second application( @15:44)
First application broker logs
---
2013-02-14 15:39:37,935 [main] IN
Activemq.conf file used by the first app which was able to start the broker
successfully
http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans";
xmlns:amq="http://activemq.apache.org/schema/core";
xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance";
xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.sprin
Thanks for the information. I have ordered the way the applications start
First application - starts the broker , creates connection to the same
broker and starts listening to some queues
Second application - creates connection to the same broker and starts
listening to different queues
Broke
Hi
I have commented the broker configurations from application-context.xml but
broker is created automatically. My app-context file has bean to create
connection to the broker. I want the broker to be created by another
application but that one fails because my first application already creates
t
Hi,
I am new to activeMQ and i am trying to setup 2 instances of activeMQ in the
same VM using network of brokers using discovery. I am using spring to
configure the brokers and they are 2 webapps on the same tomcat
The following logs mentions that connection has been established. But the
message
