set in the URI and fulfill this contractual
obligation. Has anyone tried this before and had any luck setting the cipher
order?
--
Thanks,
Joe Carder | Enterprise Architect, Open Logic
Perforce
Software<http://www.perforce.com?utm_leadsource=email-signature&utm_source=outlook-direc
Hi All,
I can't find much in the documentation but is it possible to output Activemq
logs into JSON format?
Thanks
Joe.
Hello,
I'd like to get Wiki karma so I can update the doc whenever I found an
issue with it.
My signed ICA is on file and it is under "Unlisted CLAs" section:
http://people.apache.org/committer-index.html
Name: Joe Qiang Luo
Here is my username on confluence: joeluo
Thanks,
/Joe
That helps, thanks.
gtully [via ActiveMQ] wrote:
> consider using the generic (un versioned) schema reference that can be
> resolved from the distro, so that you don't depend on the web
>
> see: http://activemq.apache.org/xml-reference.html
>
>
> On 31 January 2013
to quickly communicate this to the website owners other
than this forum.
Thanks,
Joe
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/XML-Schema-location-not-accessible-tp4662550.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Hi,
I'm trying to impl a use case where a non-persistent msg producer can
send msgs until no more disk space. We want to flow the msgs to disk with a
limit - and to detect when the space is full (instead of being throttled).
The attempt is to set tempUsage limit with sendFailIfNoSpace on the
A common gotcha is putting the config out of order as to what the XML
schema requires.
It is highly intolerant of out of order entries.
On 8 December 2011 09:42, Torsten Mielke wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Your AMQ installation should contain some sample broker configuration that
> uses a network bridge,
T_URL);
nc.addStaticallyIncludedDestination(sendMessageSyncQueue());
... + other queues
Thanks
Joe
On 6 December 2011 17:47, Gary Tully wrote:
> configure a static network bridge, add your destination to the list of
> statically included destinations. In this way you will bridge messages
> inde
ok, thanks. I've renamed the subject to shift threads.
Anyone any options for my problem?
2011/12/6 SuoNayi :
> No,it seems that you use the embedded memory broker to be a pending send
> buffer for client.
>
> At 2011-12-06 20:09:34,"Joe Carter" wrote:
>>Is
the remote process
Problem
- remote consumer is down
- message remains in embedded broker and not relayed to standalone
- this message can be lost if the process is restarted and also consumes memory
Apologies if I'm hijacking an unrelated problem.
Cheers
Joe
On 6 December 2011 11:44, To
ssages etc.
>
> On 1 December 2011 10:22, Joe Carter wrote:
>> As I require persistence on the messages, I configured the embedded
>> broker to use the MemoryPersistenceAdapter.
>> This allows me to set the persistent flag which I presume will be
>> carried forward int
but for my application that risk is acceptable.
Let me know if that doesn't do what I expect.
Thanks for the help.
Joe
On 30 November 2011 16:25, Gary Tully wrote:
> the typical activemq way to do that is use an embeded vm broker and a
> network connector to forward messages to the target w
t the moment my application receives exceptions until the connection
recovers and I can't afford to block (its a soft real time app).
If not I'll write my own wrapper but I'd be surprised if there's not
one out there already.
Thanks
Joe
Dejan: i encountered this issue and created
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-3168 last January, and it's
still open.
*Joe Niski*
Senior Developer - Information Services | NWEA™
PHONE 503.548.5207 | FAX 503.639.7873
NWEA.ORG <http://www.nwea.org/> | Partnering to help all
i don't know about those exact versions, but i've upgraded Camel on AMQ
5.3 and 5.4, simply by replacing the camel jar files in activemq's lib
directory with newer versions. We use only a few components, so had only
a few jars to update.
*Joe Niski*
Senior Developer - Infor
In AMQ 5.4 (i believe) and later, the NetworkConnector has a
"suppressDuplicateTopicSubscriptions" property that you can set to
"false". Here's my configuration
*Joe Niski*
Senior Developer - Information Services | NWEA™
PHONE 503.548.5207 | FAX 503
i've used clients that are a minor version or two behind the server
((e.g., 5.3 client with 5.5 server) with no problems for sending and
receiving.
*Joe Niski*
Senior Developer - Information Services | NWEA™
PHONE 503.548.5207 | FAX 503.639.7873
NWEA.ORG <http://www.nwea.org/> |
s, but
BrowseCommand does. It seems that activemq-admin is invoking
AmqBrowseCommand (and, on the source trunk, i see that options for
username and password have been added).
Is there a way to invoke BrowseCommand from the operating system shell
in AMQ 5.4.2 and 5.5?
--
*Joe Niski*
Senior D
oops, i noticed a bad typo in my second block, the second policyEntry
should look like this:
...
*Joe Niski*
Senior Developer - Information Services | NWEA™
PHONE 503.548.5207 | FAX 503.639.7873
NWEA.ORG <http://www.nwea.org/> | Partnering to help all kids learn™
On 09/16/2011
ern?
memoryLimit="${baseQueueMemory}mb">
...
--
*Joe Niski*
Senior Developer - Information Services | NWEA™
PHONE 503.548.5207 | FAX 503.639.7873
NWEA.ORG <http://www.nwea.org/> | Partnering to help all kids learn™
x27;t know enough about the code to pin it down.
Thanks, again.
From: Gary Tully
To: users@activemq.apache.org; Joe Smith
Sent: Friday, September 16, 2011 11:38 AM
Subject: Re: Could not start connection when using jms.prefetchPolicy on
failover protocol url
th
o the other brokers - even if the consumers on
the other brokers were busy/processing as well.
Really appreciate you and all the folks who are helping. Hope some of this
feedback will help.
Thanks
From: Gary Tully
To: users@activemq.apache.org; Joe Smith
Hi Johan,
Thanks for the info - placing the prefetch on the failover worked. I put the
prefetch on the tcp: based on the page at
http://activemq.apache.org/what-is-the-prefetch-limit-for.html.
The failover page dose not reference prefetch option:
http://activemq.apache.org/failover-transp
Could not start connection when using the following URL pattern:
failover:(tcp://localhost:61616?jms.prefetchPolicy.queuePrefetch=1,tcp://localhost:62616?jms.prefetchPolicy.queuePrefetch=1)
When prefetchPolicy is removed, connection started normally.
Broker version: 5.4.2
Java client library
JVM
eholders from further down the
file, standard Spring:
connectorPort="${remote_jmxConnectorPort}"/>
and another:
uri="tcp://0.0.0.0:${remote_openwirePortNumber}?keepAlive=true&soTimeout=3"/>
i hope this helps,
Joe
*Joe Niski*
Senior Developer -
pulled in manually.
For me, it's actually easier to do a filesystem copy of the entire AMQ
tree and hand-edit the ports in our properties files.
Also, note that when "activemq-admin create" copies the xml files, it
encodes the ">" wildcard character as ">&qu
Hi,
Just another note on our test run w/5.4.2 version which was done earlier. The
broker does not exhibit the "pausing" behavior. In fact, it actually achieve
speed of 40k msg/sec on some occasions.
However, on a close examination of log and system stats. We notice the
following:
We were u
Hi Dejan,
Thanks for the reply. We use the vmQueueCursor - for based on our benchmark -
it give us better throughput than store and file cursors. We've tried the
systemUsage configs, giving spaces to memory, store, and temp space. Seem to
get the save results. Do you have any recommendation
Another follow-up. We let the job ran over the weekend. We kill the
consumers. The messages eventually filled up the buffer. The systemUsage is
the default (commented out). Assuming the msg will flow to disk until
limit. After we stopped the consumer for 24 hrs, we tried to connect the
Sorry. Could not see the attachment. Pasting it below. Sorry for the long
trace.
ActiveMQ - 5.5.0
JVM - 1.6
OS - Linux
Hi,
We are testing 5.5.0 for an upgrade from 5.4 - hoping for a performance boost.
In our testing, we notice brokers stop delivering messages on a regular
interval. The cpu graph clearly showing a slowing down of the broker at
regular interval. With some investigation by changing the
kahaDb'
essageDatabase | main
2011-07-27 09:31:19,649 | INFO | Detected missing/corrupt journal
files. Dropped 5 messages from the index in 0.0030 seconds. |
org.apache.activemq.store.kahadb.MessageDatabase | main
So I can confirm the recovery code is working for me.
Thanks.
Joe
On 26 July 2011
http.
Could this behavior - ActiveMQ not dropping the connection even though
the client has gone offline - be caused by the keepalive setting?
For what it's worth, enabling keepalive was an (unsuccessful) attempt to
resolve this problem: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-3353.
Apologize if this is a re-post...
From: Joe Smith
Subject: Broker forwards msg only once or twice then msg stuck in queue.
To: users@activemq.apache.org
Date: Friday, June 24, 2011, 2:53 AM
Hi,
We have a cluster of 4 brokers (A, B, C, D). The test scenario is for one
produce connected to
Hi,
We have a cluster of 4 brokers (A, B, C, D). The test scenario is for one
produce connected to broker A.
1. producer sends msgs to broker A's queue.
2. stop producer. we see pending messages in queue on broker A.
3. consumer connect to broker D. consumer recv msgs.
4. stop consumer. we see
Thanks, Syed, for opening this defect - and Andreas for chiming in. It
gives me confidence that i didn't miss something obvious in my
configurations.
*Joe Niski*
Senior Developer - Information Services | NWEA™
PHONE 503.548.5207 | FAX 503.639.7873
NWEA.ORG <http://www.nwea.org/> |
if you're using ProducerFlowControl, i believe it can mean you've run
out of queue memory (not disk storage).
*Joe Niski*
Senior Developer - Information Services | NWEA™
PHONE 503.548.5207 | FAX 503.639.7873
NWEA.ORG <http://www.nwea.org/> | Partnering to help all kids learn™
Hi Martin,
We use springframework for the listener and the listener container - we did not
set the listener/container to be exclusive - not sure if you can do so in
spring. However, I don't know if that is a default setting in spring - will
look into it.
We don't use message group either - so
s one
consultant suggested) isn't an option for our production issues,
regardless of how attractive it is in the bigger scheme of things.
This is a real problem for us and our customers. Any guidance is
appreciated.
--
*Joe Niski*
Senior Developer - Information Services | NWEA™
PHONE 503.548.5207 | FAX 503.639.7873
NWEA.ORG <http://www.nwea.org/> | Partnering to help all kids learn™
Hi Edan,
Yes. with the springframework's PrefetchPolicy bean, I've used both values.
Unfortunately, the msgs were still queued within a listener container bounded a
single broker. The msgs were not re-distributed to the other 2 listen
containers (which were idle) bounded to the other 2 broke
Hi,
We are using 5.4.2 running on Linux w/Java 1.6. The cluster has 3 primary
brokers
and corresponding slaves (residing on separate hosts). We have 3 msg consumer
processes (using Springframework w/3 concurrent
threads each), connected to each broker.
Occasionally a consumer process
Q-cpp version 3.2.5 with a 5.4.2 broker running on a RHEL
5.5 machine. Going to try to upgrade to ActiveMQ-cpp 3.4.0 and see it that
makes any difference.
--
V/R,
Joe
would be the right approach to
report/fix this issue?
Thanks.
From: Joe Smith
To: users@activemq.apache.org
Sent: Tue, March 22, 2011 3:03:46 PM
Subject: virtual topic with queue consumer on a broker cluster
Hi,
I'm encountering a problem in using Vir
Hi,
I'm encountering a problem in using VirtualTopics in a cluster of 3 brokers.
Hope ActiveMQ experts can help. I attached the configuration at the end. I
used most of the networkconnector and transportconnector option, hoping I got
it
right - please help. Thank you.
OS redhad linux
java
Billy,
You might want to try with just the failover: protocol and leave out the static
failover:(tcp://host1:port1,tcp://host2:port2...)
--- On Tue, 3/8/11, billy wrote:
From: billy
Subject: ActiveMQ-5.4.2 failover not working correctly
To: users@activemq.apache.org
Date: Tuesday, March 8, 20
removeBrokerInClusterUpdate
[1]
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/activemq/trunk/activemq-core/src/main/java/org/apache/activemq/broker/region/RegionBroker.java?view=markup
On 25 February 2011 22:14, Joe Smith wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm using the 5.4.x transport's updateClusterClients
try attachment again
From: Joe Smith
To: users@activemq.apache.org
Sent: Fri, February 25, 2011 5:22:04 PM
Subject: Re: Connection Re-balance Question
Attachment.
From: Joe Smith
To: users@activemq.apache.org
Sent
Attachment.
From: Joe Smith
To: users@activemq.apache.org
Sent: Fri, February 25, 2011 5:14:51 PM
Subject: Connection Re-balance Question
Hi,
I'm using the 5.4.x transport's updateClusterClients="true"
rebalanceClusterClients="tr
Hi,
I'm using the 5.4.x transport's updateClusterClients="true"
rebalanceClusterClients="true" options.
It works fine as a broker is added to the cluster - the existing connections
are
rebalanced.
When a broker that's already in the cluster when down, the connections failed
over succes
I've upgraded to 5.4.2 and will let you know how it goes.
I didn't rebuild the index as I've already restarted the process.
In normal operation the queues should be empty for our application so
that was not an issue for me.
Thanks
Joe
On 23 February 2011 18:06, Gary Tully wr
My experience with rebuilding the kahadb index after a crash (AMQ 5.3.0) is
that it can take hours, even for a modest (< 100 MB) message store. Has this
improved in 5.4.x?
Joe Niski
IS Development | NWEA
PHONE 503.548.5207 | FAX 503.639.7873
NWEA.ORG<3D%22http://www.nwea.o
s and checkForCorruptJournalFiles
but that makes no difference.
Will moving to 5.4.2 fix this issue?
Thanks
Joe
Stack trace details...
Feb 23, 2011 4:41:13 PM org.apache.activemq.broker.BrokerService start
SEVERE: Failed to start ActiveMQ JMS Message Broker. Reason:
java.io.IOException: Invalid arg
esn't represent a boolean value) is passed in, so we're not
losing much. For now, we can either hard-wire the value or disable validation,
depending on what our security and operations folks prefer.
Here's the issue: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-3168
thanks agai
;t produce errors,
but they're for string or numeric values, not booleans.
Is there any way around this *without* disabling schema validation? i really
need to be able to configure this value outside the xml, and it worked fine in
5.3.0.
thanks in advance,
Joe
--
Joe Niski
IS Developmen
oops, ignore that, i just found the archive site. sorry for the wasted
bandwidth.
Joe Niski
IS Development | NWEA
PHONE 503.548.5207 | FAX 503.639.7873
NWEA.ORG<3D%22http://www.nwea.org/%22> | Partnering to Help All Kids Learn
On 01/25/2011 04:39 PM, Joe Shisei Niski wrot
pache doesn't have 2.4.0 available for download. i
checked almost 10 of the listed mirrors, and they don't have it either. Only
2.5.0 and 1.6.4 seem to be available.
Suggestions? Pointers?
As always, thanks in advance...
Joe
--
Joe Niski
IS Development | NWEA
PHONE 503.548.5207 | F
ActiveMqConnection? A practical limit? The sessions are used by
MessageListeners, not by producers.
thanks in advance,
Joe
--
Joe Niski
IS Development | NWEA
PHONE 503.212.3382 | FAX 503.639.7873
NWEA.ORG<3D%22http://www.nwea.org/%22> | Partnering to Help All Kids Learn
.0.jar. It hasn't seemed to cause
problems. However, i'm wondering about our impending upgrade to 5.4.1 - is
there anything i should be concerned about? Or can i simply upgrade our .car
project to consume the latest activemq-ra.jar?
--
Joe Niski
IS Development | NWEA
PHONE
thanks, Dejan! putting my broker's name in your example query (in place of
"localhost") worked. i'll followup a bit more once we actually start monitoring.
Joe Niski
IS Development | NWEA
PHONE 503.212.3382 | FAX 503.639.7873
NWEA.ORG<3D%22http://www.nwea.org/%22>
thanks, Dejan! putting my broker's name in your example query (in place of
"localhost") worked. i'll followup a bit more once we actually start monitoring.
Joe Niski
IS Development | NWEA
PHONE 503.212.3382 | FAX 503.639.7873
NWEA.ORG<3D%22http://www.nwea.org/%22>
er]"
i simply want to read the attributes on the Broker that shows up in jconsole as
a managed bean.
Has anyone else used the nagios-jmx-plugin with ActiveMQ, or can anyone offer
tips for constructing JMX queries?
thanks in advance,
Joe
--
Joe Niski
IS Development | NWEA
PHO
ts up, the
durable subscriptions don't show up in the console.
Joe Niski
IS Development | NWEA
PHONE 503.212.3382 | FAX 503.639.7873
NWEA.ORG<3D%22http://www.nwea.org/%22> | Partnering to Help All Kids Learn
On 10/22/2010 12:51 AM, James Green wrote:
We are reliant on persisten
ight persistent messages when you
take ActiveMQ down.
Joe Niski
IS Development | NWEA
PHONE 503.212.3382 | FAX 503.639.7873
NWEA.ORG<3D%22http://www.nwea.org/%22> | Partnering to Help All Kids Learn
On 10/21/2010 08:55 AM, James Green wrote:
Hi,
Due to a bug my side I've managed to
believe.
But you can call Connection.setClientID(String) to set it yourself, before
calling Connection.CreateDurableConnectionConsumer().
Joe Niski
IS Development | NWEA
PHONE 503.212.3382 | FAX 503.639.7873
NWEA.ORG<3D%22http://www.nwea.org/%22> | Partnering to Help All Kids Learn
On
That's very helpful, Stan, i really appreciate the clarity and detail. i'll
follow up on the systemUsage elements.
(re: the reply logic: sorry about that, it appears that one of our mail
gateways is stripping the reply-to header...)
Joe Niski
IS Development | NWEA
PHONE 503.212.33
inue to
be accepted by the queue, until a consumer starts or AMQ actually runs out of
heap and the producer's connection is broken.
Joe Niski
IS Development | NWEA
PHONE 503.212.3382 | FAX 503.639.7873
NWEA.ORG<3D%22http://www.nwea.org/%22> | Partnering to Help All Kids Learn
On
Thanks for the clarification, Dejan.
*Joe Niski
*IS Development | NWEA
PHONE 503.212.3382 | FAX 503.639.7873
NWEA.ORG <3D%22http://www.nwea.org/%22> ** | Partnering to Help All Kids
Learn
On 09/29/2010 01:29 AM, Dejan Bosanac wrote:
> No, producer flow control is on by default w
One additional question:
When using the default store-based message cursor, what happens when the store
is full? Does ActiveMQ throw an exception to the producer, or does it block
until messages are consumed?
Joe Niski
IS Development | NWEA
PHONE 503.212.3382 | FAX 503.639.7873
NWEA.ORG
But using the default store-based cursor requires disabling Producer Flow
Control, correct?
Joe Niski
IS Development | NWEA
PHONE 503.212.3382 | FAX 503.639.7873
NWEA.ORG<3D%22http://www.nwea.org/%22> | Partnering to Help All Kids Learn
On 09/28/2010 08:13 AM, Dejan Bosanac wrot
cking producers, at the risk of
filling up the disk)?
thanks in advance,
Joe
--
Joe Niski
IS Development | NWEA
PHONE 503.212.3382 | FAX 503.639.7873
NWEA.ORG<3D%22http://www.nwea.org/%22> | Partnering to Help All Kids Learn
Hi, sorry if this is a re-post.
I'm using amq 5.4. adium 1.3.10 on macbook runing java 1.5 jvm.
Trying to connect to default xmpp port 61222 but getting error back. Not sure
where the problem is. Error msg on broker said "borken pipe." So I dump the tcp
trace - see below.
Thanks for the help
like we have a fix, so i'm (cautiously, until
we're in production) happy.
*Joe Niski
*IS Development | NWEA
PHONE 503.212.3382 | FAX 503.639.7873
NWEA.ORG <3D%22http://www.nwea.org/%22> ** | Partnering to Help All Kids
Learn
On 08/16/2010 05:00 PM, Joe Niski wrote:
>
>
propertyValue = "foo"))?
3) what do you mean by "coalesced" subscriptions? something like this? (this
relates to question #4 form my first message in ths sub-thread)
o (3) is "no", is it possible to point to the topics on
broker A using the ">" wildcard in the "" or
"" in broker B's networkConnector?
thanks in advance,
Joe
Joe Niski
IS Development | NWEA
PHONE 503.212.3382 | FAX 503.639.7873
NWEA.ORG<3
For what it's worth, the default jetty.xml is quite different in 5.4.0 than in
5.3.x. My old (5.3.0) jetty config didn't work at all with 5.4.0, but it was
easy to modify the default to do what i wanted.
Joe Niski
IS Development | NWEA
PHONE 503.212.3382 | FAX 503.639.7873
N
ava:908)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:619)
Joe Niski
IS Development | NWEA
PHONE 503.212.3382 | FAX 503.639.7873
NWEA.ORG<3D%22http://www.nwea.org/%22> | Partnering to Help All Kids Learn
On 08/17/2010 03:26 AM, Dejan Bosanac wrote:
Hi Joe,
this sounds like a bug. Did yo
t; attributes for
on Remote (vaguely recommended in the docs) doesn't seem to
have any effect.
This seems very similar to this issue from February 2009:
http://old.nabble.com/Confusion-about-dynamicOnly-NetworkConnector-property-td22211600.html,
which didn't seem to get resolved.
Looks like Ian was working on this back in '06 using STOMP.
http://markmail.org/message/eahnrljkyemqvuag
Joe
http://www.ttmsolutions.com
ActiveMQ reference guide at
http://bit.ly/AMQRefGuide
newphoenix wrote:
>
> Hi
> Is there any J2ME library to connect and start usi
The Camel wire tap route may do the trick for ya.
http://camel.apache.org/wire-tap.html
Joe
http://www.ttmsolutions.com
ActiveMQ reference guide at
http://bit.ly/AMQRefGuide
BenXS wrote:
>
> When I read on page
>
> http://activemq.apache.org/mirrored-queues.html
>
> I
What about skipping the browser and simply issuing a selective
receiveNoWait() with the messageID that you're interested in removing from
the queue?
Joe
http://www.ttmsolutions.com
ActiveMQ reference guide at
http://bit.ly/AMQRefGuide
odysseyfx wrote:
>
> What's the be
There are a couple of dispatch policies in
org.apache.activemq.broker.region.policy that can perhaps serve as reference
implementations for ya.
Joe
http://www.ttmsolutions.com
ActiveMQ reference guide at
http://bit.ly/AMQRefGuide
mindstream wrote:
>
> I'd like to explore usi
IMHO, things should remain as is. If the broker is not being granted access
to the lock, it will never be able to go to the next step of trying to
acquire the lock.
Joe
http://www.ttmsolutions.com
ActiveMQ reference guide at
http://bit.ly/AMQRefGuide
emilyj wrote:
>
> There is an issu
This seems to work fine for me with 5.3.2. What version of AMQ are you using?
Care to share your AMQ cfg file?
Joe
http://www.ttmsolutions.com
ActiveMQ reference guide at
http://bit.ly/AMQRefGuide
Christian Hoffmann-5 wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I have a network of two brokers th
See this post from Rob and corresponding thread.
http://old.nabble.com/StoreUsage%2C-TempUsage-and-MemoryUsage-to15206526.html#a15211788
Joe
http://www.ttmsolutions.com
ActiveMQ Ref Guide - http://bit.ly/AMQRefGuide
radha_mit wrote:
>
>
> Hi,
> we are planning to shift our
LaRockstar wrote:
>
>
> Hi Joe,
>
> Thanks for you answer ...
>
>
> Joe Fernandez wrote:
>>
>> If you use the discovery agent across all your brokers, the result will
>> be a full mesh, and not tree, topology. In other words, all the brokers
>
If you use the discovery agent across all your brokers, the result will be a
full mesh, and not tree, topology. In other words, all the brokers will be
interconnected.
You do not have to explicitly create the queues at the brokers. They will be
dynamically created on-demand.
Joe
http
There is the recipient pattern and mirrored queues.
http://camel.apache.org/recipient-list.html
http://activemq.apache.org/mirrored-queues.html
Joe
http://www.ttmsolutions.com
ActiveMQ Ref Guide - http://bit.ly/AMQRefGuide
BenXS wrote:
>
> I defined the following for camel
apache.org/discovery-transport-reference.html
Joe
http://www.ttmsolutions.com
ActiveMQ Ref Guide - http://bit.ly/AMQRefGuide
bacevt wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I am trying to find the best scalability setup regarding my JMS scenario,
> and I would like to ask you to help me to do t
I've attached a PDF that illustrates how to bind and lookup AMQ objects to
and from an LDAP server using JNDI.
http://old.nabble.com/file/p28891251/AmqLdapJndi.pdf AmqLdapJndi.pdf
Joe
ActiveMQ Ref Guide - http://bit.ly/AMQRefGuide
boevink wrote:
>
> We are using an LDAP
Well, I just gave it a try myself and it didn't quite do the trick. With the
failover, the slave does wait for the master, and when the master does
start, the two appear to connect okay. However, if you bring down the
master, the slave fails to open up it transports.
Joe
Joe Fernandez
Try using a failover connector like this.
Joe
http://www.ttmsolutions.com
Andreas.Weber wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> in a cluster szenario we run a distributed application containing
> ActiveMQ. We configure a pure master/slave, with one cluster host as
> ActiveMQ master (waitFo
Hhhmmm, works for me. What version of AMQ are you using?
Do you have any clients (re)connecting to the broker?
Joe
shaun.t.erickson wrote:
>
> I've been deleting it by going to the ActiveMQ web console, going to the
> Queues page and selecting delete under Operati
What does the transport connector for your 'distant' broker look like? Reason
I ask is that the wildcard (0.0.0.0) vs localhost IP address issue has been
biting lots of folks.
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-2094
Can you telnet to your 'distant
See the following.
http://activemq.apache.org/how-do-i-delete-a-destination.html
How are you deleting it?
Joe
http://www.ttmsolutions.com
shaun.t.erickson wrote:
>
> This queue gets created on ActiveMQ start up. I delete it and it comes
> back on the next start up. Lately, it ha
l not hang and can instead
react accordingly to the thrown exception.
Joe
http://www.ttmsolutions.com
Dragisa Krsmanovic wrote:
>
> We've set up AMQ to persist all messages:
>
> http://activemq.apache.org/schema/core";
> brokerName="localhost"
>
The file being referenced in that page is the broker's xml cfg file. The AMQ
5.3.x distribution includes a number of sample broker cfg files in
ACTIVEMQ_HOME/conf.
Here's a page that has links to some user submitted cfgs.
http://activemq.apache.org/user-submitted-configurations
I think you'll need a JMS-to-JMS bridge that connects the AMQ and WLS message
brokers.
http://activemq.apache.org/jms-to-jms-bridge.html
You can also use Camel to implement such a messaging bridge.
http://www.enterpriseintegrationpatterns.com/MessagingBridge.html
Joe
ActiveMQ Ref
http://activemq.apache.org/virtual-destinations.html
Joe
ActiveMQ Ref Guide - http://bit.ly/AMQRefGuide
ingorfano wrote:
>
> hi guys need documentation on how creating virtual topic in ActiveMQ. and
> also consumer of that virtual topic.Any clue?
>
> vo
>
--
View this
The InactivityMonitor should have detected the failed connection. What value
did you assign to maxInactivityDuration? By default it is set to 3ms.
Joe
ActiveMQ Ref Guide - http://bit.ly/AMQRefGuide
daniel.stucky-2 wrote:
>
> Hi ActiveMQ Team,
>
>
>
> in the e
1 - 100 of 318 matches
Mail list logo