Hi Edan, Yes. with the springframework's PrefetchPolicy bean, I've used both values. Unfortunately, the msgs were still queued within a listener container bounded a single broker. The msgs were not re-distributed to the other 2 listen containers (which were idle) bounded to the other 2 brokers.
Thanks --- On Wed, 6/8/11, Idzerda, Edan <edan_idze...@premierinc.com> wrote: From: Idzerda, Edan <edan_idze...@premierinc.com> Subject: RE: Not able to load-balance messages in a cluster using PrefetchPolicy To: "users@activemq.apache.org" <users@activemq.apache.org> Date: Wednesday, June 8, 2011, 5:49 PM Have you tried prefetch=0 ? I was doing some similar testing a while ago and as I recall, prefetch=0 was the setting that behaved best for my round-robin consumer setup.
