Thank you. I've created AMQ-5913 for this issue.
Regards,
Greg
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/ACTIVEMQ-CLASSPATH-tp4700210p4700343.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Hello,
ActiveMQ 5.8.0 has been running in our environment (RHEL 5.0) for many
years. We have a wrapper script that sets up some environment variables
before launching ActiveMQ, including setting ACTIVEMQ_CLASSPATH to allow our
SSL classes to find and load our keystores. Although we are running on
The problems I'm seeing are in a production environment, so upgrading to a
new major version is not a really an option, unless I can be assured that it
resolves the issues I'm seeing. I am in the process of upgrading the
environment to 4.1.2, which keeps my configuration files the same. Do you
t
ion are you using and can you
> create a reproducable test case?
>
>
> Cheers
> --
> Dejan Bosanac
>
> Open Source Integration - http://fusesource.com/
> ActiveMQ in Action - http://www.manning.com/snyder/
> Blog - http://www.nighttale.net
>
>
> On Wed,
Hello,
I'm having trouble understanding the proper use for the 'dynamicOnly'
NetworkConnector property. In the table of properties described here
http://activemq.apache.org/networks-of-brokers.html, I find this
description:
dynamicOnly (default=false): if true, only forward messages if a consume
all of the
implications of this patch, so I would like some feedback from someone who
would know better than me ;-)
Thanks,
Greg Rabil
agrabil wrote:
>
> Hello,
> I'm using ActiveMQ 4.1.1 and testing a scenario using network-connector
> failover. I have three brokers, A,
Hello,
I'm using ActiveMQ 4.1.1 and testing a scenario using network-connector
failover. I have three brokers, A, B, and C. On brokers A and B, I have
the ConsumerTool running, waiting for messages for MyQueue. On broker C, I
have the following network-connector defined:
When I start
work connector defined pointing to the TCP
> TransportConnector defined in BrokerB
>
> Gaurav Hariani wrote:
>> BrokerA also needs a transport connector defined pointing to the TCP
>> TransportConnector defined in BrokerB
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> agrabi
Sorry, forgot to mention that I'm using ActiveMQ 4.1
Greg
agrabil wrote:
>
> I am testing what I believe to be a very simple network of brokers
> scenario that I can't seem to figure out. I have two brokers:
>
> Broker A has a tcp transport connector for itself, bu
I am testing what I believe to be a very simple network of brokers scenario
that I can't seem to figure out. I have two brokers:
Broker A has a tcp transport connector for itself, but no network connectors
defined.
Broker B has a tcp transport connector for itself, and a network connector
to the
10 matches
Mail list logo
