Re: Pager coverage on 12/20???

A rogue email from the 20th century - I didn’t know Pagers were still in use! > On 18 Dec 2017, at 14:52, > wrote: > > Can any of you cover pager on 12/20 from 9am - 11am EDT? I have a doc > appointment that I need to get to and am on day shift L2M coverage... L2M is > primary at 11am EDT

Re: Duplicate messages received with ActiveMQ 5.13.2

> On 1 Aug 2017, at 15:36, tpavelka wrote: > > It looks like the check for networkSubscription is there for a reason, > described in https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-2327 > The commit 6c5732b also mentions: > > /key is not to conduit proxy/proxy consumers b/c the dependencies cannot be

Re: scheduler message deliver immediately

I mean start the broker outside your code, run it standalone :) > On 27 Oct 2016, at 10:05, CallMeXYZ wrote: > > how can i get scheduler support without broker? I thought it should be > configured inside broker > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.c

Re: scheduler message deliver immediately

seems like you either have a running broker from a previous test - or you are creating multiple brokers from changing the config. Search for the activemq process and kill it. I might be easier initially to not create an embedded broker, but start it as a separate process > On 27 Oct 2016, at 09

Re: scheduler message deliver immediately

Can’t spot any gottchas. Could you set the Scheduler directory for your embedded broker - just to check its actually being created ? - see https://github.com/apache/activemq/blob/master/activemq-unit-tests/src/test/java/org/apache/activemq/broker/scheduler/JobSchedulerTestSupport.java#L100 for

Re: Activemq not listening to 61613

The address [::0] is a new one on me in uri="stomp+nio://[::0]:61613 ” - did you mean [::] (without the trailing zero?) I would try stomp+nio://0.0.0.0:61613 - which is IPv4 - but usually the platform (Windows/Linux) can handle dual ipv4 and ipv6 with no problems. > On 14 Oct 2016, at

Re: ActiveMQ data directory

> On 5 Apr 2016, at 05:23, Natarajan, Rajeswari > wrote: > > > Hi, > > I have below questions/assumptions . Please let me know if they are correct > > the data directory size (along with Kaha DB)in activemq increase linearly > with number of (same size) messages. Well - in chunks - maxFi

Re: request-reply broken on duplex network (5.12.1) ?

Be interested to see if it works if you remove the dynamicallyIncludedDestinations ? > On 10 Feb 2016, at 19:23, felixehm wrote: > > Hi, > > before opening an issue, here's what we have encountered on our production > system: > > Scenario: > Given two brokers A and B in a dynamic network > (h

Re: How fileCursor works? AMQ5.9.1

IIRC filecursor will only be used for non-persistent messages and messages sent to a topic with no durable subscriber: i.e. for any messages that can’t be stored in the message store. Is it possible you are using persistent messages ? > On 3 Feb 2016, at 05:58, fengcanyue <153133...@qq.com> wro

Re: ActimeMQ Client's thread management

> On 13 Jan 2016, at 03:30, itelleria wrote: > > Hi, > > I'm analysing how ActiveMQ client manages the threads to send and receive > JMS messages and I have some questions that I would like to ask. > > As far as I've understood when I call connectionFactory.createConnection(), > I get a Connec

Re: Message Group rebalancing

Nice feature - submit a JIRA! > On 11 Nov 2015, at 14:28, Tim Bain wrote: > > I've never heard of such a feature (but maybe someone else here has), but I > think it would be a great addition if it doesn't exist. So if you don't > get a response within a couple days, I encourage you to submit an

Re: Duplex isn't working connecting an embedded broker to a external broker

This might help - https://github.com/apache/activemq/blob/master/activemq-unit-tests/src/test/java/org/apache/activemq/network/DuplexNetworkTest.java > On 6 Oct 2

Re: Advice for Scheduler refactor.

Nice! I like what you've done. I originally used ConcurrenthashMap - but found it a bit of a hog, would be interested if you find different? > On 7 May 2015, at 19:58, Kevin Burton wrote: > >> On Thu, May 7, 2015 at 6:30 AM, Tim Bain wrote: >> >> I agree with your approach with the WeakRunn

Re: Why is MemoryMessageStore a map and not a queue… Re-implementing with a PriorityBlockingQueue

Its historical - probably at least 10 years old in origin. Only warning I would give is that ConcurrentHashMap can be slow and a memory hog for lots of inserts deletes - synchronisation around a HashMap may perform better - would be worth validating that though > On 1 Apr 2015, at 20:57, Kev

Re: ActiveMQ 5.11 Dynamic Camel Route updates

why happened with the authorization ? mtod 13 March 2015 04:02 I was able to get this working except for authorization. Thanks -- View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-5-11-Dynamic-Camel-Route-updates-tp4693120p4693136.html S

Re: Sending directly to a queue doesn’t raise ActiveMQ.Advisory.Producer.Queue.>

Good point - I think it's a bug - you can always turn advisories off if you don't want a flood of them. Can you raise an issue so it doesn't get forgotten? On 2 Feb 2015, at 17:53, Kevin Burton wrote: >> This is by design as the second case creates an anonymous producer that >> can send to an

Re: GC of inactive destinations requires no consumers?

Thats correct > On 29 Jan 2015, at 21:42, Kevin Burton wrote: > > It seems the inactive destination code requires both an empty queue and > *no* consumers on the queue? > > so if you have an empty queue, and at least 1 consumer listening to it, it > will not be GCd.. is this correct? > > --

Re: Notification of connection down between broker and client?

You could drop into ActiveMQ specific code - cast you Connection to an ActiveMQConnection and add a TransportListener to get notifications of the underlying transport events see http://activemq.apache.org/maven/apidocs/org/apache/activemq/ActiveMQConnection.html and http://activemq.apache.org

Re: Should I use a session per thread or individual acknowledge?

Hi Kevin - that sounds good as a nice simple solution - session per thread. Kevin Burton 11 June 2014 18:05 I need to acknowledge each message individually as they will take some time to process. I was thinking of creating on connection, and then a session per thre

Re: How long do I have to acknowledge() a message?

The broker holds state about unacknowledged messages - and will hold that state until either the broker shuts down or the client disappears. Remember that acknowleding a message will acknowledge all messages consumed by the client's Session. Depending on what your doing, you may want to use indi

Re: can a client "refuse" a message?

Beanstalkd might be a better fit for your use case - it's job based - and iirc allows the client to reject jobs > On 3 Mar 2014, at 09:41, Li Li wrote: > > thank you. I want to know now is that to achieve my goal(as I > described before), is it suitable to use activemq(or activemq+camel). > i

Re: ActiveMQ: REST API and JMS Headers

Hi Stephen - best thing to do would have been to reopen the issue when you added the test case - as we would have assumed it was fixed still - can you change the status on the issue? > On 4 Dec 2013, at 22:12, Stephen Vincent wrote: > > When https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-4072 wa

Re: one queue per request

This kills performance - there is an overhead to Queue creation and Queues - even temporary queues. Create one Queue for responses - and route the appropriate message in your application. On 20 Apr 2012, at 23:12, Mohit Anchlia wrote: > I have never done it this way but I see lot of references

Re: Embedded broker, non-persistent messages and store based cursor

Unfortunately - when you disable persistence in the broker, it also prevents any use of storage to disk. I suggest you don't set persistence to false and make sure the messages you send are non-persistent. You should then get the behaviour you want. On 10 Mar 2012, at 03:43, colomb wrote: > We

Re: ActiveMQ stopping repeatedly because of SyncFailedException

Upgrade to 5.3.2 - I'd dig out the issue for you but my Internet connectivity is really poor. On 6 Jul 2011, at 14:28, casperjeff wrote: > Started about a week ago. Been running activeMQ 5.3.1 with no issues for > months and months. > Suddenly, about a week ago, activemq would shut down on

Re: statisticsBrokerPlugin with Camel in Servicemix

have you tried sending a message to ActiveMQ.Statistics.Broker - to see if you get a response (you need to set the replyTo destination on the message) ? On 2 Jun 2011, at 21:13, john wrote: > I'm running the fuse 4.2.0-fuse-02-00 release. > > It includes activemq 5.3.1 along with Camel 2.2 all

Re: New Twisted Python STOMP client: stompest

Awesome! On 1 Feb 2011, at 19:19, Roger Hoover wrote: > Hi, > > If anyone's interested in a Twisted STOMP client for Python, we just > open-sourced one: https://github.com/mozes/stompest > > It builds on top of the stomper library and is well tested and used in > production with ActiveMQ and a l

Re: ActiveMQ - failing over to another server

interesting - please log this as an issue On 31 Jan 2011, at 10:48, rholt wrote: > > in case anyone ever has issues like this i will post the issue found again as > a new problem. > > essentially when a connecting system connects with failover:(tcp:IP:PORT) > then things are fine. however when i

Re: HermesJMS demo link is not resolving.

I think we'll need to remove the link - I'm not sure what happened to all the ActiveMQ stuff on codehaus? On 17 Dec 2010, at 15:27, rliguori wrote: > > This page (http://activemq.apache.org/hermes-jms.html) states, "Mark Bucayan > kindly submitted a Flash demo showing how to use ActiveMQ inside

Re: Producer flow control question

Would need to see how you've configured the infamous JMSTemplate - to see what the problem is On 17 Dec 2010, at 16:44, maarten.dirkse wrote: > > Hi, > It's often said that producer flow control (PFC) is one of the most > misunderstood features of ActiveMQ, and I couldn't agree more. After what

Re: Message stuck on queue

For statistics - can you should be able to use wildcards - if you use '>' as the destination name - what do you get ? On 10 Dec 2010, at 22:23, watcher wrote: > > An update so far. > > We stilll cant seem to find a resolution to this issue. We have noticed > similar user having problems. > See

Re: Concurrent consumers

Yes - you can have concurrent consumers - looks like you've fallen victim to prefetch subscription - http://activemq.apache.org/what-is-the-prefetch-limit-for.html I suggest you use a prefetch of 1 cheers, Rob Rob Davies follow me: http://twitter.com/rajdavies I work here:

Re: Quest for Job queue

You mean JMS Queue ;) On 7 Nov 2010, at 10:30, Norman Maurer wrote: > Just use a JMX queue for this. It will do what you need out of box. > > Bye > Norman > > 2010/11/7, Allan Kamau : >> I am new to ActiveMQ and messaging as a whole. I am developing a >> parallized application the missing compon

Re: Scheduler failover in Master-Slave

Yes - that would be possible - you can set the directory used for the scheduler database in the activemq XML configuration file On 2 Nov 2010, at 09:25, werdex wrote: > > Thx for reply! > Maybe is it possible to continue to keep the messages in database > (oracle,ms-sql) , but use shared file sy

Re: Scheduler failover in Master-Slave

The only way to do this currently is to use a SAN or GFS - see http://activemq.apache.org/shared-file-system-master-slave.html On 2 Nov 2010, at 08:42, werdex wrote: > > Hi! > I am using AMQ_SCHEDULED_DELAY when sending a message to ActiveMQ and found > that scheduler stores it data at activemq-

Re: JDBC Master Slave approach with Journal for HA

You shouldn't use the high performance journal with JDBC Master/Slave - http://activemq.apache.org/jdbc-master-slave.html with the journal and JDBC database - messages are stored in the journal - and only the references to those messages are stored in the journal - which would be local to the ma

Re: timeToLive with out of sync clocks

Have you looked at the timestampPlugin - http://activemq.apache.org/timestampplugin.html ? On 25 Oct 2010, at 06:04, simevans wrote: > > We are using activemq 5.3.2. We noticed our subscriber does not receive > messages when the clock on the subscriber is out by more that the timeToLive > that

Re: Reg Managing Listeners

I'd look at advisory messages to do this - see http://activemq.apache.org/advisory-message.html On 25 Oct 2010, at 11:23, sudheer wrote: > > Hi, > > Please suggest how we manage various listeners listening on activemq topic? > > I have an administration job which keeps checking the status of a

Re: Exceptions with shared nothing master/slave

eek! - do you have a test case you can reproduce this with ? On 19 Oct 2010, at 02:41, Marcel Jager wrote: > HI, > > I've setup a master/slave configuration using the 'A Shared Nothing' > deployment. > I had two fresh ActiveMQ 5.4.1 deployment and two servers named activemqc > and activemqd. >

Re: KahaDB - log f

I did this a while ago too see if it would improve performance - it didn't so I ditched the code. Why do you want to do this? On 15 Sep 2010, at 18:02, nervousbadger wrote: > > We've decided that we will need to implement per-queue log files. > > Do you know if anyone has attempted this before?

Re: Correct way to build a mesh of brokers

That ordering issue is a pita - appologies - 5.4 should be out next week cheers, Rob On 26 Jul 2010, at 19:31, ripienaar wrote: > > > > ripienaar wrote: >> >> The configs for 5.3.2 is not compatible with 5.4, I'd say that renders 5.4 >> useless and I cannot test. Given the state of the docu

Re: Duplex and network fault.

o add some code lines to avoid this case Not easy at >> first view. >> >> Eric-AWL >> >> >> rajdavies wrote: >>> >>> Hi Eric, >>> >>> yes I think this is the case - I think we need to ensure that the old >>

Re: Duplex and network fault.

Hi Eric, yes I think this is the case - I think we need to ensure that the old connection is destroyed when the new one joins cheers, Rob Rob Davies follow me: http://twitter.com/rajdavies I work here: http://fusesource.com My Blog: http://rajdavies.blogspot.com/ I wrote this: http

Re: How is the Message ID compiled

ed to complete the id. cheers, Rob Rob Davies follow me: http://twitter.com/rajdavies I work here: http://fusesource.com My Blog: http://rajdavies.blogspot.com/ I wrote this: http://www.manning.com/snyder/ On 21 Jul 2010, at 11:15, Neil Pritchard wrote: > Hi, > > I'm using ActiveMQ

Re: What happens with Topic msgs if there is no subscriber? Postpone deletion?

You can do that - see SubscriptionRecoveryPolicy - http://activemq.apache.org/subscription-recovery-policy.html cheers, Rob Rob Davies follow me: http://twitter.com/rajdavies I work here: http://fusesource.com My Blog: http://rajdavies.blogspot.com/ I wrote this: http://www.manning.com/snyder

Re: KahaDB and TOPIC problems

Firstly - upgrade to 5.3.2 - there are some minor bug fixes - but also performance enhancements. I would check that you don't have a durable subscriber in your system that was active at some point - but is no loner - you can use JMX to do this On 2 Jul 2010, at 09:51, RJtokenlanring wrote: >

Re: KahaDB storage - corruption risk

Indexes in KahaDB have a replay log - so its very unlikely you will get a corrupted index On 1 Jul 2010, at 10:43, cmoulliard wrote: > > What are the risks that a client could be faced regarding to the kahadb > storage (synchronisation of index, lost of index or data, ...) ? > > Is there a way

Re: Confusion about How KahaDB works !!!

Hi charles - are you using transactions? On 1 Jul 2010, at 15:12, cmoulliard wrote: > > Hi, > > I'm confused and try to understand How ActiveMq works with KahaDB. My > activemq broker 5.3.0 is configured to be non persistent > > and messages send are also delivered as NON persistent but KhaDB f

Re: activeMQ thread pool

ssages - unless you've configured asyncDispatch to be off on the client (property on the ActiveMQConnectionFactory). Phew. So answer your question - there are zero threads used per Topic. cheers, Rob Rob Davies follow me: http://twitter.com/rajdavies I work here: http://fusesource.com My

Re: JMX Pending queue size issue

Good catch Colin! - thanks for investigating it cheers, Rob Rob Davies follow me: http://twitter.com/rajdavies I work here: http://fusesource.com My Blog: http://rajdavies.blogspot.com/ I wrote this: http://www.manning.com/snyder/ On 25 Jun 2010, at 17:33, Colin Goodheart-Smithe wrote

Re: default file store location

In the current working directory of your application - under a directory called activemq-data cheers, Rob Rob Davies follow me: http://twitter.com/rajdavies I work here: http://fusesource.com My Blog: http://rajdavies.blogspot.com/ I wrote this: http://www.manning.com/snyder/ On 24 Jun

Re: Differences between AMQ 4.1.1 and 5.3.2

I would use at least 5.3.2 - 5.x has a faster default persistent storage - but the main difference is there no overhead on the depth of Queues to broker memory. cheers, Rob Rob Davies follow me: http://twitter.com/rajdavies I work here: http://fusesource.com My Blog: http

Re: Failover and updateClusterClients

rmance. > > 4) If broker A is restored, will the client be advised of this on the next > successful communication with any broker? If not, when or how? Yes the client will be informed about it > > Thanks for any clarification anyone can give. > > > Mark... > -- > View

Re: broker same or seperate jvm

Generally use the same JVM if you want to co-locate with your application/service - and you want the broker to only be available at the same time as your application/service :) cheers, Rob Rob Davies follow me: http://twitter.com/rajdavies I work here: http://fusesource.com My Blog: http

Re: about BrokerURL

Actually what you are staying is correct - daemon=true would set the Transport thread to be a daemon thread. This works on 5.4/5.3 cheers, Rob Rob Davies follow me: http://twitter.com/rajdavies I work here: http://fusesource.com My Blog: http://rajdavies.blogspot.com/ I'm writing this:

Re: ActiveMQ ignoring persistent=false

that looks like a bug that has crept back in - its created - but no data should be put in that directory cheers, Rob On 22 Jun 2010, at 08:25, paul.mckenzie wrote: > > I am using Active MQ (5.3.2) for integration testing my application. I have > defined an active-mq broker in a spring config

Re: activeMQ broker for our useCases

the same broker can do both On 15 Jun 2010, at 05:08, radha_mit wrote: > > Should we have separate message brokers for persistent and non persistent > messages or a same broker will do for both ? > -- > View this message in context: > http://old.nabble.com/activeMQ-broker-for-our-useCases-tp28

Re: AMQ Persistence Store explanation

indexKeySize is the maximum size of a key used in a persistent hashmap used for indexes. Don't change this :) indexPageSize is the size of the page in the persistent hashmap - multiple pages are stored in a has bin. 4096 is the optimum size (or multiples of that) indexBinSize is the initial numbe

Re: Message-Level Authorization between brokers?

Hi Jim, could you supply a patch ? - not sure I understand your use case - or why you would apply it only to networks ? thanks, Rob On 26 May 2010, at 01:45, Jim Lloyd wrote: > I've done more research and I think I know better where ActiveMQ would > support my desired feature, and it seems the

Re: ActiveMQ and Jetty 7.0.2

Jetty 7 will be supported in release 5.4 - due out this summer On 19 May 2010, at 04:13, go canal wrote: > Hi, > Can I confirm that 5.3.2 does not support Jetty 7.0.2 ? I am using Ajax, and > saw an error message: > > 2010-05-19 10:52:58.597:WARN::Error > java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: org/mor

Re: Activemq comunication causes out of memory

is the activemq version the same on the client and the broker ? On 12 May 2010, at 11:48, dimitarn wrote: > > New one > > javax.jms.JMSException: Wire format negotiation timeout: peer did not send > his wire format. > 10:27:28,745 ERROR [STDERR] at > org.apache.activemq.util.JMSExceptionSu

Re: Activemq comunication causes out of memory

ok - can you try creating the MessageProducer only in the initialize() code and not close() it after every message send ? On 5 May 2010, at 09:37, dimitarn wrote: > > [CODE] > @Override > public void initialize() throws JMSException { > connection = createConnection(); >

Re: Activemq comunication causes out of memory

I'd recommend not creating a producer for every message you send - this has a significant performance impact. Also - what does initialize() and startProcessing() do ? Obviously you are running out of heap - but its not clear that this is because of ActiveMQ. On 5 May 2010, at 08:40, dimitarn wro

Re: Master/Slave mode - slave never taking over

Hi Rich, have you replicated the network connections in the master configuration into the slave configuration ? This is important. How did you stop the master ? - did you just kill it ? (this shouldn't be problem - but might help to identify where it is) You could try failover://tcp://67.23.5.

Open source pubcrawl Tuesday 20th April

Starting at 5.30pm here: http://www.mickeesonthewater.com/ Making way to Boston (or until I fall over) - all welcome :) cheers, Rob

Re: My Benchmark stats

Awesome results! On 18 Apr 2010, at 15:37, Vibe from Boston wrote: > > I will be soon posting the benchmark stats on my blog, but I wanted to post > it here. > all on one meaty machine, Intel I7 64bit Windows server, 8GB ram. > > Client sends a message to nio based server [thru xsocket lib]. th

Re: Topic Inheritance

Yes - ActiveMQ supports destination hierarchies - a '.' dot notation denotes an element in the name. To extend your example - say you had models too - to subscribe to all Ford cars - you would use '>'. e.g. car.ford.> You can use the '*' to subscribe to everything for So to subscribe to cars -

Re: ActiveMQ 5.3.0 cpu usage goes to zero

Tim - try 5.3.1 On 26 Mar 2010, at 20:16, TMcCabe wrote: > > > Config file: >http://activemq.apache.org/schema/core"; > brokerName="localhost" dataDirectory="${activemq.base}/data" > advisorySupport="false"> > > > > > > > > >

Re: Messages stuck in the queue

catching Throwable would be best. You wouldn't need to redeploy the JMS queue - just restart the client should do On 26 Mar 2010, at 16:40, Cristian Botiza wrote: > When you say 'you miss an ack somewhere'...does this mean onMessage() throws > an exception? > > I've had this problem before, I a

Re: ActiveMQ 5.3.0 Memory Usage - Connections

Is there a good explanation > somewhere? > I'm still troubled that the Topic has no dequeues. Should I be? > > Peter P > > -Original Message- > From: Rob Davies [mailto:rajdav...@gmail.com] > Sent: Thursday, March 25, 2010 9:39 AM > To: users@activemq.ap

Re: ActiveMQ 5.3.0 Memory Usage - Connections

This could be due to https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-2512 - could you try 5.3.1 ? On 25 Mar 2010, at 13:28, Pothier, Peter wrote: > Hi, > > I finally figured out how to use jconsole remotely (I had a > misunderstanding > of what value to use in -Djava.rmi.server.hostname=, using t

Re: OutOfMemoryException in consumer

What happens if you run that code without the database piece ? Also - have you reduced your prefetch to 100 ? Are you receiving messages that aren't ObjectMessage types ? On 25 Mar 2010, at 00:24, Milan Tomic wrote: > > Memory consumed is growing slowly with a time... over 100 MB in one day a

Re: Strange problem

Hi Alex, could you try with the KahaDB persistence adaptor ? cheers, Rob On 23 Mar 2010, at 17:26, abosetti wrote: > > Hi all > > I am experiencing a strange problem. Every other time that I startup my > tomcat server, I get the message > SEVERE: IOException while loading persisted sessions:

Re: AMQ DataStore exception leading to Java.IO.EOFException

Yes - though make sure its KahaDB - there's an older store called Kaha - we aren't very good at thinking up new names! On 17 Mar 2010, at 01:15, Sebastian Rodriguez wrote: > Do you guys think switching to Kaha Data Store could solve this issue ( <=> > this issue is AmqDatastore specific?) > > On

Re: Messages lost when ServerSessionPool.getServerSession() throws a JMSException

thanks for opening these! On 15 Mar 2010, at 21:52, rodos77 wrote: > > JIRA AMQ-2653 created: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-2653 > https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-2653 > -- > View this message in context: > http://old.nabble.com/Messages-lost-when-ServerSessionPo

Re: prefetchExtension off-by-1 for transacted consumers with prefetchSize > 0

sorry its taking us a while to respond - generally raising a jira with a junit test case is the best way to go. I know its more effort - but each issue does take us a while to verify and then fix. Patches are always very welcome too! On 15 Mar 2010, at 20:02, rodos77 wrote: > > Any responses to

Re: WARN : AMQPersistenceAdapter - The ReferenceStore is not valid - recovering

Yes 5.3.1 should be much better - can you try a snapshot of 5.3.1 ? On 11 Mar 2010, at 15:22, Roland Thomas Lichti wrote: > Hi Rob, > > Rob Davies schrieb: >> this happens when AMQ Store is not shutdown cleanly - the references have to >> be rebuilt from the transaction l

Re: WARN : AMQPersistenceAdapter - The ReferenceStore is not valid - recovering

this happens when AMQ Store is not shutdown cleanly - the references have to be rebuilt from the transaction logs. Nothing to worry about - but would recommend KahadB is 5.3/5.3.1 On 11 Mar 2010, at 12:14, cmoulliard wrote: > > Hi, > > How can we interpret this WARN message : > > 2010-03-04

Re: Move from ActiveMq Message Store to KahaDB

already done :) On 6 Mar 2010, at 10:08, cmoulliard wrote: > > Hi Dejan, > > Thanks for the tip. In fact I will create a network of brokers with by > example two static url. The old one pointing to the old. As messages need to > be consumed on the new broker, the old one will send the messages s

Re: Multiple isolated brokers

Which version? There's an issue 5.3 with memory usage and Queues with KahaDB - if that's the case - try 5.3.1 snapshot Sent from my iPhone On 26 Feb 2010, at 21:46, E White wrote: We are still having memory usage issues, but I no longer think it has anything to do with the camel activemq c

Re: Multiple isolated brokers

activemq.xml file or otherwise that I may need to specify and change? Thanks! -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/Multiple-isolated-brokers-tp27720815p27720815.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. Rob Davies http://twitter.com/rajdavies I work

Re: Too much "subscription MBeans" => OOM.

tion-MBeans%22-%3D%3E-OOM.-tp27685385p27691468.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. Rob Davies http://twitter.com/rajdavies I work here: http://fusesource.com My Blog: http://rajdavies.blogspot.com/ I'm writing this: http://www.manning.com/snyder/

Re: Too much "subscription MBeans" => OOM.

t associated to a session, to a consumer, to a client part of an exchange ??? Thank you in advance. Eric-AWL -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/Too-much-%22subscription-MBeans%22-%3D%3E-OOM.-tp27685385p27685385.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabb

Re: Problem: Failed to page in more queue messages

led-to-page-in-more-queue-messages-tp27677296p27677296.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. Rob Davies http://twitter.com/rajdavies I work here: http://fusesource.com My Blog: http://rajdavies.blogspot.com/ I'm writing this: http://www.manning.com/snyder/

Re: Did Jencks amqpool turn into org.apache.activemq.pool?

camel documentation should be updated to avoid confusion? -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/Did-Jencks-amqpool-turn-into-org.apache.activemq.pool--tp27676866p27676866.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. Rob Davies http://twitter.com/rajdavies I work

Re: Bridging not working reliable

mailing list archive at Nabble.com. Rob Davies http://twitter.com/rajdavies I work here: http://fusesource.com My Blog: http://rajdavies.blogspot.com/ I'm writing this: http://www.manning.com/snyder/

Re: Stuck messages - Dispatch issues

Stuck-messages---Dispatch-issues-tp20467949p27664135.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. Rob Davies http://twitter.com/rajdavies I work here: http://fusesource.com My Blog: http://rajdavies.blogspot.com/ I'm writing this: http://www.manning.com/snyder/

Re: Stuck messages - Dispatch issues

patch-issues-tp20467949p27664135.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. Rob Davies http://twitter.com/rajdavies I work here: http://fusesource.com My Blog: http://rajdavies.blogspot.com/ I'm writing this: http://www.manning.com/snyder/

Re: Slow sending of messages

hats why I was interested to find out if you'd discovered some kind of fresh angle. Regards, Maarten -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/Slow-sending-of-messages-tp26849964p27623064.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. Rob Davies ht

Re: Slow sending of messages

s the topic, and their dequeue/enqueue stats flatline as well, even though flow control shouldn't apply to them. Thats why I was interested to find out if you'd discovered some kind of fresh angle. Regards, Maarten -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/Slow-sen

Re: Slow sending of messages

x27;t apply to them. Thats why I was interested to find out if you'd discovered some kind of fresh angle. Regards, Maarten -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/Slow-sending-of-messages-tp26849964p27623064.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Slow sending of messages

pply to them. Thats why I was interested to find out if you'd discovered some kind of fresh angle. Regards, Maarten -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/Slow-sending-of-messages-tp26849964p27623064.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at

Re: OOM with high KahaDB index time

-with-high-KahaDB-index-time-tp27217704p27555173.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. Rob Davies http://twitter.com/rajdavies I work here: http://fusesource.com My Blog: http://rajdavies.blogspot.com/ I'm writing this: http://www.manning.com/snyder/

Re: Bytesmessage and http transport

Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. Rob Davies http://twitter.com/rajdavies I work here: http://fusesource.com My Blog: http://rajdavies.blogspot.com/ I'm writing this: http://www.manning.com/snyder/

Re: LoggingBrokerPlugin and DLQ

the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. Rob Davies http://twitter.com/rajdavies I work here: http://fusesource.com My Blog: http://rajdavies.blogspot.com/ I'm writing this: http://www.manning.com/snyder/

Re: LoggingBrokerPlugin and DLQ

mailing list archive at Nabble.com. Rob Davies http://twitter.com/rajdavies I work here: http://fusesource.com My Blog: http://rajdavies.blogspot.com/ I'm writing this: http://www.manning.com/snyder/

Re: How to configure 5.3 broker over KahaDB to support lots of unconsumed persistent msgs?

F. -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/How-to-configure-5.3-broker-over-KahaDB-to-support-lots-of-unconsumed--persistent-msgs--tp27277849p27569119.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. Rob Davies http://twitter.com/rajdavies I work here: http

Re: OOM with high KahaDB index time

is message in context: http://old.nabble.com/OOM-with-high-KahaDB-index-time-tp27217704p27555173.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. Rob Davies http://twitter.com/rajdavies I work here: http://fusesource.com My Blog: http://rajdavies.blogspot.com/ I'm wri

Re: OOM with high KahaDB index time

message in context: http://old.nabble.com/OOM-with-high-KahaDB-index-time-tp27217704p27555173.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. Rob Davies http://twitter.com/rajdavies I work here: http://fusesource.com My Blog: http://rajdavies.blogspot.com/ I'm wri

Re: ActiveMQ with HTTPS: message string too long

- << "[0x9]at org.mortbay.jetty.servlet.ServletHandler.handle(ServletHandler.java: 362)[\n]" DEBUG - content- << "[0x9]at org.mortbay.jetty.servlet.SessionHandler.handle(SessionHandler.java: 181)[\n]" DEBUG - content- << "[0x9]at org.

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   >