Re: max-size-bytes and paging-max-size bytes

2025-06-04 Thread Justin Bertram
As I mentioned, using something like "name#" or "name*" might work for your use-case technically speaking, but that's relying on undocumented (and unintended) behavior. I recommend you change to using a delimiter (e.g. "name.#" or "name.*"). Justin On Wed, Jun 4, 2025 at 11:54 AM Franck Malka w

Re: max-size-bytes and paging-max-size bytes

2025-06-04 Thread Franck Malka
I upgraded from 2.14 to 2.41 in 2.14 name# was working fine. On Wed, Jun 4, 2025 at 7:24 PM Justin Bertram wrote: > Are you referring to the "match" of an "address-setting"? If so, "name*" > looks a little strange. As the documentation [1] states: > > > An Apache ActiveMQ Artemis wildcard expr

Re: max-size-bytes and paging-max-size bytes

2025-06-04 Thread Justin Bertram
Are you referring to the "match" of an "address-setting"? If so, "name*" looks a little strange. As the documentation [1] states: > An Apache ActiveMQ Artemis wildcard expression contains words separated by a delimiter. The default delimiter is '.' (full stop). > > The special characters '#' and '

Re: Clustering Spring Boot embedded ActiveMQ Artemis with MQTT clients

2025-06-04 Thread Justin Bertram
The Artemis test-suite is full of examples of clustered, embedded brokers. I'd recommend looking at org.apache.activemq.artemis.tests.integration.cluster.distribution.SimpleSymmetricClusterTest. You'll have to dig through some scaffolding for the test-suite, but everything you need should be there.

Re: max-size-bytes and paging-max-size bytes

2025-06-04 Thread Franck Malka
I sorted it out by replacing the match prefix from "name#" to "name*" On Wed, Jun 4, 2025 at 6:59 PM Justin Bertram wrote: > Can you be more specific about where exactly you're looking? If possible, > steps to reproduce the behavior you're observing would be ideal. > > > Justin > > On Wed, Jun 4

Re: max-size-bytes and paging-max-size bytes

2025-06-04 Thread Justin Bertram
Can you be more specific about where exactly you're looking? If possible, steps to reproduce the behavior you're observing would be ideal. Justin On Wed, Jun 4, 2025 at 4:18 AM Franck Malka wrote: > Hi, All > > In my broker.xml I configured different address-settings for different > address na

[Application crashes due to an ActiveMQ exception]

2025-06-04 Thread mohamed dridi
Hello , I hope you are doing well   Could you please assist me with the issue below ?  I am investigating an issue that a client of ours reported but I didn't manage to figure out the root cause by myself. The application crashes and the event log shows NullReferenceException in the method Clear

Clustering Spring Boot embedded ActiveMQ Artemis with MQTT clients

2025-06-04 Thread Vaclav Haisman
Hi. We have developed a Spring Boot application with embedded ActiveMQ Artemis which has MQTT clients. We have our customized `ActiveMQSecurityManager5` instance which uses the Spring Framework beans to do its thing. Now, we would like to make it more performant and we are looking at clustering.

max-size-bytes and paging-max-size bytes

2025-06-04 Thread Franck Malka
Hi, All In my broker.xml I configured different address-settings for different address name matches. mainly altering max-size-bytes and paging-max-size bytes parameters. I do observe significant improvement in performance with the new settings. What I don't understand is that on the JMX console i