It's being lead by StreamNative, which provides a hosted Pulsar service. They
haven't said it, but my gut's telling me that the end goal is to consolidate
their serverless/hosted solution into a single cluster instead of needing to
shard into multiple clusters.
- Nathan
On Sun, Mar 16, 2025,
> We cannot have any message loss in an active-active symmetric cluster,
and that is why the HA requirement.
In that case you would have 2 pairs of HA brokers all in the same cluster
so that when a primary fails the backup will activate and join the same
cluster as the other primary.
> Does the J
Justin,
We are trying to do both (cluster with HA). We cannot have any message loss in
an active-active symmetric cluster, and that is why the HA requirement. So, I
believe we would need at least 2 groups with a live and backup broker each for
a total of 4 brokers.
Does the JMeter Performanc
> ...we have found that using one broker will not satisfy our throughput
requirements even with various tuning.
Performance tuning can be something of a dark art. I'm curious about your
use-case, specific testing methodology, performance goals, observed
performance, and tuning strategy.
> We have
Justin,
With our current infrastructure, we have found that using one broker will not
satisfy our throughput requirements even with various tuning. We have been
using the ActiveMQ Classic Performance Module plugin to test against Artemis:
https://activemq.apache.org/components/classic/document
If an active/active deployment is a the only requirement perhaps the dual
mirror feature of Artemis is a possible deployment scenario?!
You can find it in the docs at chapter 7, look for "Mirroring".
HTH
Mihael
Mihael Schmidt
Software Engineering
Bauformat Küchen GmbH & Co. KG
Kattwinkel 1 |
I lost the plot somewhere along the way I think. What specifically is your
use-case? Why are you wanting multiple clusters?
Justin
On Wed, Mar 19, 2025 at 8:29 AM William Crowell
wrote:
> Justin,
>
> So, you would definitely need one cluster with 2 brokers and another
> cluster with at least o
Justin,
So, you would definitely need one cluster with 2 brokers and another cluster
with at least one preferably two brokers as well?
Regards,
William Crowell
From: Justin Bertram
Date: Wednesday, March 19, 2025 at 9:25 AM
To: users@activemq.apache.org
Subject: Re: What HA Replication Polic
> The HA piece only cares whether a cluster is defined and not necessarily
if it is a health cluster.
To be clear, HA pairs use clustering mainly for discovery. In the case of
shared storage this discovery allows the primary broker to inform Core
clients (including Core JMS clients) about the clus
Vilius,
Have one cluster defined as a single broker and another cluster defined with a
single broker as well just to meet the HA requirement.
Regards,
William Crowell
From: Vilius Šumskas
Date: Wednesday, March 19, 2025 at 9:11 AM
To: users@activemq.apache.org
Subject: RE: What HA Replicatio
Sorry, I don't understand what you mean by 1 node cluster.
--
Vilius
-Original Message-
From: William Crowell
Sent: Wednesday, March 19, 2025 3:02 PM
To: users@activemq.apache.org
Subject: Re: What HA Replication Policy Is For Active-Active Topology
Vilius,
Thank you for your rep
Vilius,
Thank you for your reply. Can we do 2 broker clusters of 1 node each with HA
on top? The HA piece only cares whether a cluster is defined and not
necessarily if it is a health cluster.
Regards,
William Crowell
From: Vilius Šumskas
Date: Tuesday, March 18, 2025 at 8:23 AM
To: users@
12 matches
Mail list logo
