Correct.
> On Jun 4, 2024, at 7:37 AM, Boeltl, Stefan
> wrote:
>
> Hi Robbie,
>
> thanks, that was the one I remembered.
>
> So if I understand this correctly, we could "mix and match" as we want to and
> don't have to be afraid of compatibility issues between 5.18.x (a least
> 5.18.4) clie
Hi Robbie,
thanks, that was the one I remembered.
So if I understand this correctly, we could "mix and match" as we want to and
don't have to be afraid of compatibility issues between 5.18.x (a least 5.18.4)
clients and resource adapter on the on side and 6.x (at least 6.1.0) broker on
the oth
Hello Justin,
I saw the announcement for Artemis 2.34.0 and the fix for the migration
from LiveOnly to PrimaryOnly. Thank you very much for your support.
Regards,
Bernd
Am 03.05.24 um 08:34 schrieb Bernd Köcke:
Hello Justin,
thanks a lot for the ticket and your work!
Regards
Bernd
Am 03.0
You will likely have read
https://lists.apache.org/thread/pr2ty60xx54tm3tfnfb1k2hbrmvm59no or
the related Jira https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-9418
On Tue, 4 Jun 2024 at 10:54, Boeltl, Stefan
wrote:
>
> Dear committers,
>
> I can't recall where I read about compatibility issues when usi
Dear committers,
I can't recall where I read about compatibility issues when using 5.18.x
clients/resource adapter with a 6.x broker (it was something to do with javax
vs. jakarta namespaces I think), that's why I post the following questions:
1. Are 5.18.x client (activemq-client, so javax nam
