You will likely have read
https://lists.apache.org/thread/pr2ty60xx54tm3tfnfb1k2hbrmvm59no or
the related Jira https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-9418

On Tue, 4 Jun 2024 at 10:54, Boeltl, Stefan
<stefan.boe...@fisglobal.com.invalid> wrote:
>
> Dear committers,
>
> I can't recall where I read about compatibility issues when using 5.18.x 
> clients/resource adapter with a 6.x broker (it was something to do with javax 
> vs. jakarta namespaces I think), that's why I post the following questions:
>
> 1. Are 5.18.x client (activemq-client, so javax namespace) and the resource 
> adapter compatible to a 6.x broker (all using Openwire)?
> 2. If not (because of javax/Jakarta clash): would it help to change all 
> clients to use activemq-client-jakarta (and what about the resource adapter - 
> any way to change to jakarta namespace here?)?
> 3. Any other thoughts for compatibility (besides moving to qpid and AMQP for 
> clients - unfortunately there's no XA enabled RA available here) if we need 
> to stay on Java 11 (= ActiveMQ 5.18.x) on client side?
>
> Thanks as always!
>
> Stefan
> The information contained in this message is proprietary and/or confidential. 
> If you are not the intended recipient, please: (i) delete the message and all 
> copies; (ii) do not disclose, distribute or use the message in any manner; 
> and (iii) notify the sender immediately. In addition, please be aware that 
> any message addressed to our domain is subject to archiving and review by 
> persons other than the intended recipient. Thank you.
> Message Encrypted via TLS connection

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@activemq.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@activemq.apache.org
For further information, visit: https://activemq.apache.org/contact


Reply via email to