RE: ActiveMQ custom plugin

2017-11-25 Thread Tim Bain
On Nov 24, 2017 5:44 PM, "Gupta Bharat" wrote: hello Tim, My Custom Plugin is getting installed as I am using log4j to print random stuff and its getting printed in logs. Can you please describe in more detail exactly what methods that logging is done in and how it proves that the plugin was

Re: ActiveMQ.DLQ : explanation

2017-11-25 Thread Tim Bain
I think this is the same issue that you already have a thread open for (and that you've already closed one other duplicate thread). If there's something specific here that merits its own thread, please clarify what it is; otherwise let's close this thread as another duplicate. Tim On Nov 24, 2017

Re: Lost messages.

2017-11-25 Thread Tim Bain
On Nov 24, 2017 2:53 PM, "dfco21" wrote: Thanks for the update. I don't have a lot of information on the Sevice Cloud consumer, it's a third-party application and the access is very limited. This sounds like it will make it difficult for you to troubleshoot the behavior you're seeing. If that

Re: Artemis documentation

2017-11-25 Thread Clebert Suconic
We have a package that can be used for unit tests only. On the iPhone now. I can add more details on Monday or tomorrow maybe. On Sat, Nov 25, 2017 at 7:46 PM Robert Huffman wrote: > I use an embedded broker for unit tests, and that's the primary reason for > wanting to create it programmatica

Re: Artemis documentation

2017-11-25 Thread Robert Huffman
I use an embedded broker for unit tests, and that's the primary reason for wanting to create it programmatically. Currently I typically use a Fucked container for the broker in production. On Nov 25, 2017 12:22 PM, "Clebert Suconic" wrote: > Are you using it embedded? > > Just trying to think

Re: Artemis documentation

2017-11-25 Thread Clebert Suconic
Are you using it embedded? Just trying to think what you are coming from. And focus where to improve it. On Sat, Nov 25, 2017 at 12:52 PM rth wrote: > This is probably going to come off as whining. However, I hope the > maintainers of Artemis will take it in the spirit it is intended, as a > li

Artemis documentation

2017-11-25 Thread rth
This is probably going to come off as whining. However, I hope the maintainers of Artemis will take it in the spirit it is intended, as a little (hopefully) constructive criticism. >From what I gather, Artemis is going to replace ActiveMQ at some point in the future. If that is the case, I feel ii