Are you using it embedded? Just trying to think what you are coming from. And focus where to improve it.
On Sat, Nov 25, 2017 at 12:52 PM rth <robert.huff...@gmail.com> wrote: > This is probably going to come off as whining. However, I hope the > maintainers of Artemis will take it in the spirit it is intended, as a > little (hopefully) constructive criticism. > > From what I gather, Artemis is going to replace ActiveMQ at some point in > the future. If that is the case, I feel iike the project needs some work on > the documentation. I have a feeling that in its current state the > documentation may be a barrier to adoption. > > Currently I am trying to see what it would take to update a project to use > Artemis. I think I'm going to be able to make it functional, but it seems > to > be taking a lot longer than it should. I end up digging through source code > to see how to use features that the documentation merely hints about. > > For example, I have lots of unit tests that use the vm protocol. That's > easy > in ActiveMQ: using it to create a connection will start an embedded broker > if there is not one present already. it appears that is not the case with > Artemis, and I cannot figure out how to programatically start an embedded > server that handles the vm scheme. I just ended up using the tcp protocol > (and that was not particularly easy, either.) > > Another example: I cannot figure out how to disable persistence in an > embedded broker, or even if it's possible. I am not using persistence, but > my broker is creating journal files. > > A third example: I have no idea what most options are for > TransportConfigurations. TransportConstants seems to tell me what options I > can set, but I no clue what most of them are. > > > > > -- > Sent from: > http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-User-f2341805.html > -- Clebert Suconic
