No.
On Apr 1, 2016 11:13 AM, "Natarajan, Rajeswari"
wrote:
> KahaDB has HA with ZooKeeper ?
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: tbai...@gmail.com [mailto:tbai...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Tim Bain
> Sent: Friday, April 01, 2016 7:01 AM
> To: ActiveMQ Users
> Subject: Re: Activemq HA without s
Ah, I had assumed (for no good reason, on rereading) that the producer was
also STOMP. If not, disregard my question.
On Apr 1, 2016 9:01 AM, "James A. Robinson" wrote:
> Since he says he can send a generic JSON message, I assume that is without
> the "transformation=jms-object-json" message hea
Hi,
I am trying to setup address-setting in my broker.xml to automatically
create a DLQ for each queue created. I am creating queues using client and
would like to have one DLQ for each queue created.
Looking for similar stuff like "individualDeadLetterStrategy" given on below
link
http://active
On 04/01/2016 05:48 PM, Igor Livshin wrote:
I downloaded Active MQ 10.2.0 (for Windows) and unzipped it.
My environment: Windows 7 (64-bit)
JDK 1.7
When I execute "activemq.bat start" command from the \bin directory, the
following exception is shown in the log:
2016-04-01 16:32:04,123 | ERROR |
I downloaded Active MQ 10.2.0 (for Windows) and unzipped it.
My environment: Windows 7 (64-bit)
JDK 1.7
When I execute "activemq.bat start" command from the \bin directory, the
following exception is shown in the log:
2016-04-01 16:32:04,123 | ERROR | Failed to start Apache ActiveMQ
([localhost,
Hello friend,
Glad to know that you are in market of pins
Here is olivia from PINSVILLAGE in kunshan city,China. There are many kinds of
products including pins, coins, medals,etc.
Thus, this is a source for high-quility lapel pins at competitive price, hope
to cooperate with you.
Any que
I'm not sure if there has been anything reported that would specifically
relate to your issue. So much of the code has changed since then so I
wouldn't know what would be related or not at this point. It's also
possible that it has been fixed from a side effect of another bug fix or
the behavior
5.13.0 was updated to Karaf 4 because of pax web and the upgrade to Jetty
9.2.x.
On Fri, Apr 1, 2016 at 11:48 AM, Martin Lichtin
wrote:
> I see
>
> org.osgi.framework.BundleException: Unresolved constraint in bundle
> activemq-karaf [124]: Unable to resolve 124.0: missing requirement [124.0]
> o
KahaDB has HA with ZooKeeper ?
-Original Message-
From: tbai...@gmail.com [mailto:tbai...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Tim Bain
Sent: Friday, April 01, 2016 7:01 AM
To: ActiveMQ Users
Subject: Re: Activemq HA without shared Database or Shared file system
There used to be a share-nothing mast
I see
org.osgi.framework.BundleException: Unresolved constraint in bundle activemq-karaf [124]:
Unable to resolve 124.0: missing requirement [124.0] osgi.wiring.package;
(&(osgi.wiring.package=org.apache.felix.gogo.commands)(version>=0.16.0)(!(version>=1.0.0)))
when trying to upgrade ActiveMQ
Hi Everyone,
Its official, AcitveMQ-CPP v3.9.3 has now been released.
This release fixes the way producers creation is handled so that a
failed create attempt will result in an exception being propagated to
the caller in all cases.
The Wiki page for the release is here:
http://activemq.apach
OK, thanks for your answer. I guess I was hoping for too much. But maybe you
could just tell me if you have had a past bug that needed to be fixed where
messages have been lost? If you could point us to where I could read that
for ActiveMQ 4.1.2 or later, that would be very helpful. I've searched t
Since he says he can send a generic JSON message, I assume that is without
the "transformation=jms-object-json" message header, the system is properly
mapping JSON to a generic Java Object, right? If the custom mapping failed
I assumed that would mean the class defined in the
META-INF/services/org
Kevin Burton has already identified that GCing destinations is horribly
inefficient when the number of destinations is large; search the archives
for posts from him for more details. He has proposed some fixes (in Git,
but against an earlier version), but so far as I know no one from the
community
I would have assumed that object serialization and deserialization would
either both happen on the broker or neither happen on the broker, and that
if serialization was going to happen (and fail due to a missing JAR) on the
broker at dispatch time, deserialization would have had to happen at
enqueu
I think he's using European-style formatting, and that those numbers are
forty-five thousand, ninety thousand, etc.
Those numbers sound great to me; I was always getting numbers in the order
of magnitude of 1000 like Quinn said, even though I expected to go faster
since we only did non-persistent
Yes, file a JIRA, and attach a minimal configuration to reproduce the
problem.
BTW, from what you describe, I'd expect that this would happen for any
client (including a tiny Java test app you could write), which would take
Nagios out of the equation. Can you confirm that that's the case? Once
y
Just to highlight something that might or might not already be obvious: the
message consumed advisories are triggered when the message is acknowledged,
which might happen before or after the consumer actually processes the
message, depending on your ack mode.
On Apr 1, 2016 5:12 AM, "Christopher Sh
There used to be a share-nothing master-slave configuration but it was
buggy and never worked right and has since been removed. Replicated
LevelDB is the only option that doesn't have a singleton resource, though
you could make the argument that the Zookeeper cluster is a singleton
resource spread
Some people are using it. I wanted to, but decided I wasn't comfortable
relying on it.
On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 19:15 Natarajan, Rajeswari <
rajeswari.natara...@sap.com> wrote:
> Is replicated level DB store production ready now.
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: James A. Robinson [mailto:j
Take a look at the available advisories:
http://activemq.apache.org/advisory-message.html
It sounds like you want to get notified when subscribers actually receive
the messages so you should look at
the ActiveMQ.Advisory.MessageConsumed.Topic advisory topic.
On Fri, Apr 1, 2016 at 1:40 AM, Shobha
The version of the broker you are using is something like 8 or 9 years
old. You are most likely not going to find someone willing to help unless
you upgrade to a much newer version.
On Fri, Apr 1, 2016 at 2:49 AM, Joel Cambon wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I've lost messages following this configuration/s
Hello,
I've lost messages following this configuration/scenario, but I'm not able
to reproduce this problem again, so I am asking for information about the
recovery process from the Journal in case the database was not able to
persist pending messages.
Here is the scenario:
1 - ActiveMQ server is
23 matches
Mail list logo
